blurb

joined 5 days ago
[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think one would be recognizable over the microphone while masturbating tbh.

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 49 points 20 hours ago (9 children)
[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some live ISOs like TailsOS do allow persistent storage without installation, which was (probably?) what they were trying to ask.

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Use bridges? I don't think it would be possible to block WebTunnel for example.

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I don't have that issue 😅

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think that reply is satire as they also say "then mercilessly deconstruct it".

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I am also very curious about this. Why do we have 3 196s?

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

What makes you say that? Any e-mail provider can intercept and read any e-mail they want to. This explanation by cock.li is pretty good on this issue:

How can I trust you? You can't. Cock.li doesn't read or scan your e-mail content in any way, but it's possible for any e-mail provider to read your e-mail, so you'll just have to take our word for it. No "encrypted e-mail" provider is preventing this: even if they encrypt incoming mail before storing it, the provider still receives the e-mail in plaintext first, meaning you're only protected if you assume no one was reading or copying the e-mail as it came in. When possible, you should use X.509 or GPG with your mail correspondents to encrypt your message content and prevent it from ever being handled in plaintext on our servers. You should also download and delete your mail from our servers regularly, which alone is almost as good as encrypting your mail.

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I don't think there are any services that can compare to YouTube in any way.

view more: next ›