ava

joined 1 year ago
[–] ava@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

by Chrome they usually mean chromium and all of its derivatives since those will also get mv3 unless they specifically opt out

[–] ava@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

both privacy and security are important and neither one is going to save you from a social engineering attack.

and besides, trusting on your users to only go to well known websites isn't something you should rely on.

but yeah, I totally get your point

[–] ava@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

as long as you set it to 'Optimal' or 'Complete' it's going to be able to block YouTube ads for example. that's the main thing I missed while trying out dns adblockers and as such it's definitely not too limited for me

[–] ava@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

for anyone wondering, there's already a manifest v3 version of ublock origin available from the same developer.

[–] ava@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  1. liberalism > conservatism
  2. firefox > chromium based and yes, i found it the hard way.
[–] ava@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm personally going to vote pekka haavisto and be done with it.

[–] ava@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

tbh Google isn't blocking ad blockers with manifest v3.