ZJBlank

joined 1 year ago
[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

You’re right, it’s intended to compensate for extra sag of the rear suspension, but if I don’t need them aimed up then I might as well keep them down so as not to dazzle any oncoming drivers

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I fucking wish, we rarely get that here in North America. I had that on my old Mazda 3, and fucking loved it. I’d always keep them angled all the way down in the city with well-lit streets and only angle them up on the highway

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Heck yeah man, wagons are the shit. I freaking love my Golf wagon.

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dude, I drive tractor-trailer and still get blinded frequently, with my eyeballs like eight or nine fucking feet off the ground. It’s ridiculous. New Subarus are the worst offenders right now, their low beams are literally aimed up on like a 15 degree angle

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I’m opposed to blanket gun bans, but I’m not sure I’d trust “The Gun Blog”as an unbiased provider of reliable information.

That said, the proposal that pissed me off the most was to ban all firearms that are capable of accepting a larger than five round magazine. You want to ban 10 round magazines, fine, I don’t need 10 rounds for my tikka. But banning my target rifle because ten rounders exist for it? Fuck right off.

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I thought this was NCD at first

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

That’s the joke

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You're probably right, I’m being too quick to jump to conclusions.

As an aside, I find it a little ironic that most of the world follows ICAO phraseology, yet Canada, home to ICAO’s headquarters, does not.

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That makes a lot of sense, because like I said in another comment, I’d be more likely to interpret that as “taxi into [takeoff] position and hold”, not “taxi to threshold.” Hopefully the change that comes of this is US/Canadian aviation starts using the ICAO standard phraseology.

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Interesting, we the same sort of language as the US up here in Canada too, but I always assumed it was the same thing the world over. Is there a website or handbook containing ICAO standard language available somewhere? I’m curious what other differences there are

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I couldn’t make sense of anything in that recording, but if you’re right about the tower call, then that sounds a lot more like “taxi into position and hold” than “taxi and hold short of runway.”

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Best I have is an old Midland Gun Company double barrel shotgun that belonged to my great-grandfather. Passed through the Birmingham Proof House and bears 1904-1925 proof marks, but doesn’t actually have a date stamp, my understanding is that they didn’t start date stamping until 1921. The company was bought by Parker-Hale and the records were subsequently destroyed in a fire, so I’ve never been able to find out exactly how old the thing is.

view more: next ›