Ymer

A subset of the data seems to be readily available, if someone (with high or low T?) wants to swoop in and make us all a bit wiser:

https://dataverse.unc.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi%3A10.15139%2FS3%2FZYRZ5J

Not sure why anyone would bother making it look natural/accidental?

From your source: "Even though cervix penetration is not actually anatomically possible, cervical stimulation is, and this can be enjoyable for some women."

I'm actually willing to concede that cervical penetration is a theoretical possibility. Through daily sounding and dilation over a long period of time, you might be able to fit a penis. Even then, actually getting the penis through the cervix would be exceedingly difficult: The uterus isn't fixed in a vertical position, on the contrary, it'll usually be bent forward, backward or to the side. During sounding, it'll usually be stabilized by a speculum at minimum. That wouldn't be possible during intercourse, again making penile penetration of the cervix highly unlikely even if one was actively trying.

As for the changes after childbirth, they're not as pronounced as you seem to think. The external orifice might change from a pinpoint to a short slit, but otherwise the cervix isn't all that different. After all, one of its functions is to be able to keep a fetus in place more than once. Actual source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1597273/

To sum up, no woman should be worried about their cervix being penetrated during normal intercourse, regardless of how many children they've had or how big their partner was. I can't speak to what happened between you and your partner, but I guess all that matters is that you both found it enjoyable 😁

I mean this in the least horny way possible, but I'm going to need an actual source for that.

... for being black. If the room wasn't busy being all black in an otherwise well-lit house then none of it would have happened.

I'm thinking of doing the same with my current Android FP5. Does it wipe everything or are you able to keep some apps during the process?

I'm calling dibs on the band name "The Dangerously Educated Proletariat"!

I very much appreciate the effort to write your repsonse, and if you're out of time or energy I completely understand.

So if I'm understanding you right, we're 3-dimensional creatures living in a 4-dimensional universe, with the 4th dimension being... time? And time behaves completely different from the other 3 dimensions, which is why we can't just disregard or freeze it when trying to determine a center?

That could sort of explain why it's inherently impossible to determine the center - but that doesn't rule out the existence of a geometric center of the universe, right?

I'm not sure if I follow the balloon analogy. Sure, you can't find the center on it's surface. But somewhere within the balloon, there is a center. It might be virtually impossible to determine the center while actively inflating the balloon, but that doesn't mean there isn't any center? What makes the rest of the universe fundamentally different from an inflating balloon? I'm genuinely curious.

Shouldn't it be (at least theoretically) possible to find some sort of geometric center where - on average - the rest of the universe is expanding away from?

Yeah, but it'll be a random family member - not necessarily a woman or LGBTQ+.