Now CBC is painting it like it … but they didn’t do it last week when the flight attendant were bullied by the work minister Patty Hadju. They didn’t point it as an act of defiance when Postal Worker and Rail Worker bring the gouv to court for the same thing.
TribblesBestFriend
Defund the SPVM
Pis ça presse
seven hours
So AC already had an option, they choose to force the strike
Yeah … they worked unpaid too. Not at the same rate but statistics show that women’s work relies heavily on some form of unpaid labor
This should be enough to call for his resignation and Patty Hadju’s.
Just talked with one of my friend journalist in Quebec City. Turns out that on the 50 recommendations that Google made, only 13 were usable for a grand total of 8 streets corner lights (for nearly 900 lights in Qc city). This is a fucking puff piece by CBC/RC for Google
Quebec City is the first municipality in the country to partner with the web giant's Green Light project, which the company offers free of charge to cities.
When something is free it’s because you’re the product
Finally a « media » that say what we already know :
Every single one of these [27] workers, expressed a common belief that Air Canada had been in contact with the CIRB before the strike was declared, and that the government was prepared to intervene prior to the strike commencing. The union itself has not endorsed this view, noting it remains unverified. […]
Michael Rousseau, the CEO of Air Canada seemed to be completely blindsided. “We thought, obviously, Section 107 would be enforced, and that they wouldn’t illegally avoid (it),” he said in an interview with Bloomberg. In the interview, he admitted that he had made no provisions for the passengers who are currently stranded. […]
Canadian law provides that any individuals who are stranded in the event of a strike are owed a fully paid flight back on another airline, regardless of whether they have an inter-airline agreement or not. It is encouraged by experts to refuse any offer of a refund, since other airlines have exponentially increased their prices to take advantage of consumers who don’t know their legal rights. […]
I’m pretty sure that’s the proper procedure. They will charge him, the procurer will choose to follow up or not IF the crown choose to prosecute he will plead self defence (likely win) and will have to prove that he had properly store his firearm.
I’m not a lawyer so maybe I’m in the wrong but I’m pretty sure that’s how it works
Exactly. Didn’t want to look like they publish a tonne of puff piece about the poor travellers that didn’t get their flight