Tommasi

If that's their plan, they're definitely not going about it the right way. For most European countries, the chances that they'd be willing to let vital industries be sold to the US has changed from at least some possibility to actually impossible under Trump. He's practically forced everyone to become more protectionist.

This is the chud equivalent of "Can't wait to see Drumpf try wriggling his way out of this mess."

Just wait a little bit more and he'll prove he's actually a genius

Cool how their metric for chatbot usage can mean literally anything, very helpful chart

It's not that the initial owners are supposed to hold their coins because they're honorable or anything like that, it's that their accounts get restricted so they can't sell usually for at least a year or two, which was what was supposed to happen with the hawk tuah coins too. These types of rug pulls are seen as scams because you secretly give away or sell coins pre-launch which does not have those restrictions while regular buyers are kept ignorant. It's probably illegal, but because crypto is a scammers parardise it happens constantly.

Nah, it was definitely a rug pull. it didn't just randomly tank, insiders got a bunch of tokens either cheap or for free then were allowed to immediately dump when normal people could start buying, it was obviously intended to make insiders tons of money.

I also don't think crypto bros are the primary targets of celebrity and influencer crypto scams. Instead they're banking on that person's fanbase not knowing enough about crypto to see it's a scam. What personal role hawk tuah girl played i have no clue, but she has at least some responsibility for promoting it and putting her name on it.

Even trying to see things from a lib perspective the data harvesting argument makes no sense to me. If you're worried about your data ending up in the hands of someone who could use it against you, a social media app from a somewhat hostile foreign country is way safer than local social media that sells all it's data to the state that actually has power over you.

Exotic Falconry & Finance

I agree that it's useless, moralizing advice for people who struggle to lose weight. That doesn't mean the theory itself is unsound, and for people who don't have larger issues regarding their weight but want to regulate a little bit it's basically the only thing they need to be aware of.

It's not a falsehood. First of, one example wouldn't disprove literal decades of research proving the contrary, but also this example isn't incongruent with CICO at all. You can increase caloric consumption and lose weight if other factors causes your body to burn more calories.

When I say CICO is the only way to regulate body weight I don't mean calorie tracking. Calorie tracking is absolutely not required, or arguably even helpful, for most people. But you have to do SOMETHING that either changes the amount of calories you consume or how much your body burns. If you don't nothing changes.