Thorry

joined 1 week ago
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago

Trans rights are human rights!

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago

Where I live it's the same, the machine does all the work. But there's always one or two dudes that walk ahead of the truck and make sure it's all positioned and spaced correctly. Especially in the city where streets can be narrow and there isn't enough room, they end up just wheeling the bins into the machine a couple at a time.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We need to hear from both sides tho. What are the brain worm-having people saying?

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

3060 TI was a midrange card when it released, I wouldn't expect it to still be viable. You might have bought it 3 years ago, but it released at the end of 2020. So almost 5 years old at this point. With GPU development rates being what they are, that's a long time.

If you still want to get the most out of it: Lower the resolution, this helps a lot. Running at 1080p should probably work just fine. Also check out your memory bandwidth, that is usually the bottleneck for getting the most out of an 5600x. Overclock it if you can, the higher the memory clock, the better it will be.

For the future, my experience is the 70 TI holds up a little bit better than the 60 TI. But this can differ per gen of course. And because of "AI" GPU prices have gone through the roof, so fuck AI.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I keep a very sharp scalpel next to my printer. It's super thin and a bit flexible, but still has a sturdy handle to hold on to. With it I can get in between the glass and the PETG no matter how stuck it is. Once I cut a little bit, usually the whole print lifts right away.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago

The current US economy is completely dependent on two things. One: low unemployment and steady growth in available jobs. Two: AI getting a return on investment by replacing millions of jobs with computers.

And somehow we are still going about our business like this is totally normal and won't blow up any second now.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They aren't thinking about that, they are thinking of themselves. They are duped into thinking the stock will continue to go up indefinitely. Sure it has dipped a bit, but over the course of 1 year, it's still up 50%. We've been hearing about the stock tanking all year, but in reality it's only down 8% and will probably go up again. Over the course of 5 years it's up over 175%. This makes it a very tempting stock to invest in, it's big gains in a short amount of time. All you need to know is exactly when to buy and when to sell.

At least until the ceiling is hit and the floor falls out, then the stock implodes and all the money is gone. Everyone with a brain looking at the actual company Tesla and all the idiotic stuff Musk has been doing has expected this to happen. But for various reasons this hasn't happened yet.

And remember a lot of things Musk has done aren't legal at all. Blatant market manipulation, total disregard to any rules and laws. Plus all the shit he's pulling with Twitter and xAI folding into Tesla and SpaceX. SpaceX only being held afloat by massive government investments and investments into Starlink. SpaceX is making a lot of money launching Starlink all the time. With the way they've designed it, those units de-orbit within a few years, being so low to be well inside the atmosphere. So they need to keep on launching to keep the network going all the time. Investors are paying for this, in the hopes Starlink ends up making enough money to pay for it. Nobody has ever gotten any similar satellite networks to be profitable, but who knows, they might make it work.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I recently read a cool book and wanted to know what other people thought about it. I had no idea how to find out, probably obscure forums or something. But with search engines being shit these days, I could only find one line reviews. I was looking for something a little more in depth.

So I thought hey let's try some kind of LLM based solution, this is something it should be able to do right? So I told Chatgpt hey I read this book and I liked it, what are some common praises and criticisms of that book? And the "AI" faithfully did as told. A pretty good summery of pros and cons, with everything being explained properly without becoming too verbose. Some of the points I agreed with, others less so. Wow, that's pretty neat.

But then alarm bells started ringing in my head. Time for a sanity check. So in a new chat I posed the exact same question, word for word. However I replaced the name of the book and the name of the author with something completely made up. Real sounding for the context, not obviously fake, but weird enough a human would give pause. And of course, not similar to anything that actually exists. The damn thing proceeded to give a very similar result as before. Different points, but the same format and gist. In depth points about pacing and predictability of a book I made the fuck up just seconds earlier.

I almost fell into the trap thinking LLMs could be useful in some cases. But in fact they are bullshit generators that just happen to be right some of the time.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your mom's so fat, she pushes the barycenter of the solar system outside of the diameter of the Sun

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

My keyboard these days is much much stronger than the keyboard I had in the 90s. In the 80s the back was full metal and some had the case be metal as well. Then in the 90s it went all plastic and super fragile. For the past 15 years or so I've had a keyboard with a thick metal frame. I've smashed it lots of times and it doesn't care at all. If you'd pick it up and smash the monitor with it, it would totally destroy the monitor. My desk is a metal frame with solid wood, but the average IKEA desk probably wouldn't stand a chance.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 18 points 3 days ago

Tell me Legolas, what do your elven eyes see?

Fucking pixels Aragorn, it makes me want to puke. And what the fuck is up with these compression artifacts? What tier of Netflix do you have?

Sorry Legolas, could we just enjoy the movie?

Maybe if the dwarf stops stinking up the place. And don't think I didn't see him take that last chicken wing, fucking dwarves.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure you can physically move the gate. The intergalactic gate bridge proves that in spades. But there's more to it than just the gate. It's also all the supporting hardware. Without a DHD you need so much hardware to make it work. Then there's all the security issues. Being inside a mountain is a huge plus when it comes to safety. Not just from a foothold situation, but also when being connected to a black hole for example. And having a failsafe device is also something easier done inside a mountain. You can destroy the entire base without basically setting off a nuke without warning in the mainland US. Possibly even destroy the base without anybody on the outside knowing about it, or with the option to say it's an accidental collapse. Then there's moving all the personnel, who are all stationed at that base. With other programs like NORAD being stationed there, it's easy to hide what you are doing. This is much harder on other sites, especially to cover up the huge energy hookup needed to establish the wormhole before it can draw power from the other side.

Bottom line it would cost probably a billion dollars or even more. That's if a good enough site already exists, otherwise it would cost way more. And in the end be worse off in every possible way. Yeah no, you are right, that sounds exactly like a Trump move.

view more: next ›