Piatro

joined 1 year ago
[–] Piatro@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

I believe it's 1% for access to the "entire post-open ecosystem", rather than 1% per project which would be unreasonable. So you could use one or thousands of projects under the Post-open banner, but still pay 1%.

It will take years to develop the post-open ecosystem to be something worth spending that much on.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I think there's a bit of "whoosh" happening...

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

I said in another comment but basically the left have a tougher message to sell than the right. The right says that the system works but it's the foreigners/benefit thieves/refugees stealing your money/house/jobs. That is inherently quite easy to understand without much thought or critical thinking. The left on the other hand have to tell you all about Thatcher, Reagan and neoliberalism before we even get to the point of solutions which are usually incredibly radical like changing the fundamental economic model we've all been operating under since the 80s. Inherent in that is a fear that the left's solutions will take assets and wealth away from people. While the right promises that your assets, wealth and property rights are sacred and that it's the "other" that will have their assets, wealth and rights taken away. Again, very easy-to-understand messaging for the right versus the left.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Genuine question, where are the extreme left rising? I haven't seen any but that might be the algorithms/my news sources talking.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I totally agree that neoliberal economics are essentially what we understand to be economics now. To be clear, I'm not blaming the left, I think it's a case of they have a more difficult message to convey. To explain the problems that neoliberal economics has and to propose a solution to them is a really hard task compared with "it's the foreigners at fault". It's a much clearer, more concise and seemingly solvable problem compared with "we need to overhaul the global economy".

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So I didn't make a statement about that. I'm making a statement about what these results might tell us, admittedly in a very simplistic way.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 149 points 4 months ago (33 children)

Far right parties gaining significant popularity especially in France and Germany. It's not great for the neo-liberal centre who created and perpetuated the economic downturn we're all in and indicates a failure of the left to present a coherent alternative. There's a lot to unpack about it. France has already dissolved their parliament and triggered an election because of these results.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

Literally just bought what I believe to be last generation's X13 on ebay for half the price of the new one. It's been great so far, especially with the power efficiency of Ryzen CPUs. My one complaint is the soldered RAM, which judging by the new lineup is getting phased out, thankfully.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

My specific point here was about how this friend doesn't trust the results AND still goes to Google/others to verify, so he's effectively doubled his workload for every search.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago (9 children)

I've had this argument with friends a lot recently.

Them: it's so cool that I can just ask chatgpt to summarise something and I can get a concise answer rather than googling a lot for the same thing.

Me: But it gets things wrong all the time.

Them: Oh I know so I Google it anyway.

Doesn't make sense to me.

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 19 points 5 months ago

I've been programming for too long, my brain just autocorrected the typo so initially didn't get the joke...

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Lancer, I need to finish my Curse of Strahd campaign first...

view more: next ›