Numberone

joined 2 years ago
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, if its in human poo it's already in the carbon cycle and so really less of an issue. The problem is bringing up carbon that's been removed from the cycle (subterranean oil or gas pockets) and putting that back into circulation. Granted it would be better to pull carbon out of the atmosphere (somehow), but at least using poo wouldn't be adding NEW carbon. That's my understanding anyway.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

As a Iong time ST fan I just way to say, this game was a great time. It was like I was playing through a ST episode, dilemma and all. Sending a ship to warp cinematically was something I never knew I wanted to do, but it was perfect.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't get it either. I always had standard electric in places where I lived until now. My first gas stove: 1. Often smells of gas which implies a slow leak which is scary 2. Isn't vented at all, so it's spewing who the fuck knows what, even when it's working properly. Give me an induction surface and a big air fryer and I'm happy.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a non programmer, isn't visual basic for Excell scripts?

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

Just looked it up, looks like it's still Amazon. Could be missing something though.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're comparing linear distance to surface area of the south China sea. I'd be curious to know how close to Chinese airspace this bomber or group was flying. Fair enough though, if you think it's not analagous we could open it up to the entire gulf of Mexico/Caribbean. It seems pretty clear to me that Chinese aircraft in that area would result in a tantrum that would probably escallate beyond tailgating.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

I genuinely don't understand why so many people go with the network brand. AFAIK all of the US networks have MVNO's that operate on their networks at much lower cost. Some of those virtual operators are even owned by the big guys, e.g. Cricket on ATT. My coworkers pay literally hundreds of dollars more per month than is necessary, and what, they get a few Mbps faster data rates? Is that really worth it?

Edit: TIL a lot of people have had a hard time with MVNO's. My experience has been excellent and consistent, but that apparently doesn't generalize.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

Came here to mention Trolls 2 as well. This film has great standing in my family.

view more: ‹ prev next ›