lol you're just plain wrong on that. Apple fans these days are like you: They make fun of everyone outside of their group instead of the products themselves, because you all understand you won't ever be winning an objective argument.
MotoAsh
joined 1 month ago
Exactly.
It's like the Golden Rule version of the Paradox of Tolerance. If someone would demonstrably never extend you the courtesy, then you should have no obligation to extend said courtesy first.
Only a fool attempts to welcome an invading army in.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33's lead writer had apparently never played a video game before writing it
Well, it's not bad in and of itself. It sucked in Titanfall because straight up campaign dialogue was playing on top of fast paced FPS gameplay. Get your goal done but still under fire and running for your life with bullets flying everywhere? Don't care!! Here's 30 seconds of dialog you cannot even hear...
Of course it's easy to err the other direction and have all the dialog utterly destroy the pacing of action, too.
It's why I specifically mentioned FPS games. It's no big deal to sit around conversing or just watching stuff unfold for 10 minutes in an RPG. Do that in an FPS game that happens to have a deep story, then you better hope you've properly telegraphed to the audience that the action is over for a while!
It would depend entirely on how it was phased out. If it's straight up now totally illegal, they'd have to shut down or change product. If it's just becoming a restricted chemical, they'd have to attain licenses or some other form of permission and likely find new customers since I doubt you'd be able to sell to the general public.
I'm sure there are good and bad examples of how governments handled it all throughout history... Even recent history. Which country had the dumbass that basically made extrajudicial and vigilante killings of drug dealers legal? If such a turn happened for my product in such a country, I'd be closing up shop pretty fast if my product was made illegal...
Cocaine itself would likely be more under the "just shut down" side, since refining plants and stuff is a bit less transferrable of a skill/process than, say, chemistry skills and tools for cooking meth. Though that's an assumption, because I don't know the process! Maybe it'd be easy to switch to a different product.
No. No it doesn't, ALL human-like behavior stems from its training data ... that comes from humans.
Well, it's also stupid to use RAM size as an indicator of a machines CPU load capability...
Definitely sending off some tech illiterate vibes.
Edison was DEFINITELY not unique or new in how he was a shithead looking for money more than inventing useful things... Like, at all.
Yes, if you factor in the source of disposable culture: capitalism.
"Move fast and break things" is the software equivalent of focusing solely on quarterly profits.
Definitely part of it. The other part is soooo many companies hire shit idiots out of college. Sure, they have a degree, but they've barely understood the concept of deep logic for four years in many cases, and virtually zero experience with ANY major framework or library.
Then, dumb management puts them on tasks they're not qualified for, add on that Agile development means "don't solve any problem you don't have to" for some fools, and... the result is the entire industry becomes full of functionally idiots.
It's the same problem with late-stage capitalism... Executives focus on money over longevity and the economy becomes way more tumultuous. The industry focuses way too hard on "move fast and break things" than making quality, and ... here we are, discussing how the industry has become shit.
Wouldn't the allegory for class be job? Or maybe career?
No, they're pointing out the chilling effect of shitting on the topic.
You're the kind of fuckwit that would say Chris Hansen does no good against predators because he's one guy doing a small set of stings... You're the kind of guy who'd shit on a compromise policy that's otherwise still a step in the right direction. You're the kind of guy to make good the enemy of great.
and you have the gall to use insults when YOU are the one committing the social faux pas...
Pathetic. If you're going to point out flaws, be constructive with it. Otherwise it is still on YOU if someone assumes negative intent from unconstructive criticism.
Microsoft might prove that one wrong if they keep enshittifying Windows.