Kirk
joined 4 months ago
I like where your head's at, but Mastodon's system of verification seems much easier to me and doesn't rely on a third party.
Also this is not a news article, it's an opinion essay. It's perfectly reasonable to read this at any time.
For YouTube tutorial videos I have no issue with relying on GPT, but I think it's important to recognize that the translation of art is art. I don't feel good about the idea of something without a soul or perspective interpolating a work of art from one culture and language into another that might be wildly different from where it started.
That all said, I think Crunchyroll and anyone else using AI art without disclosing it absolutely should be honest about it.
Lemmy does feel more and more like 4chan every day...
The term "reasoning model" is as gaslighting a marketing term as "hallucination". When an LLM is "Reasoning" it is just running the model multiple times. As this report implies, using more tokens appears to increase the probability of producing a factually accurate response, but the AI is not "reasoning", and the "steps" of it "thinking" are just bullshit approximations.
This is literally literally a drama article
It's annoying to be treated that way isn't it?
Please don't sealion me.
That's a good point, I have no doubt Linux would not be in the position it is if he were more sensitive to it.
Anyone else here actively put off by Linux drama and headlines like "Torvalds Drops support After Clash!"
EDIT: New rule?
This bit at the end, wow:
Agentic AI is wrong 70% of the time, but even assuming a human employee is barely correct most of the time and wrong 49% of the time, is it really still more efficient to replace them?