The Community Group for #ActivityPub is drafting an open letter calling for respect and collaboration between the people working on the different protocols in the open social web.

I'm signing the letter, and with it, I have some thoughts regarding discourse, decentralisation and why I think this space matters.

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In a post where she signs the open letter, ActivityPub co-author Christine Lemmer-Webber summarises the changing world well:

“This is actually a really important time for that message to come across, because our communities do both face major threats which I believe we are ideologically aligned in wanting to face:

We are facing a large number of laws which appear well-intentioned and aimed to try to take on tech gatekeepers, but unintentionally build regulatory moats that allow only gatekeepers to participate, and which threaten user freedom at large.

The rise of techno-fascism and omnisurveillance affects all users. Neither ATProto nor ActivityPub, at present, are built in such a way that they can provide the levels of protections necessary to respond to the needs of activists and community members against nation-state level threats.

These are our existential threats, not each other. And we need to figure out how to work together.”

I'm reading this as "be nice to the Bluesky guys, because we have a bigger problem to deal with."

That's fine, I'm not inclined to be mentally ill at strangers on the internet.

But I'm also not going to call it decentralized when it's meaningfully not, and I'm going to keep an eye on where their money comes from.

We have a common enemy in government control.

But if you're going to be my friend, I need you to not lie to my face.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

~~Yeah, I'm seeing a lot of misdirection and reframing of the situation here. Should we be "cool" and "respectful", yes, absolutely. Should we all agree ATP is a good idea and worth adopting? Absolutely not. It should be rejected until they figure out how to properly decentralize. As of now the protocol itself seems to fundamentally require so many resources that it disqualifies it from any sort of meaningful discussion. I hope to be wrong. Maybe as they inevitably grow to become excessively shittier, some other hosts will step in.~~

I was wrong.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

As of now the protocol itself seems to fundamentally require so many resources that it disqualifies it from any sort of meaningful discussion.

Cannot that be done for 40$ per month? https://whtwnd.nat.vg/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l

@irelephant@anarchist.nexus @airportline@lemmy.zip

@irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Edit: for an example on how to create an account: https://feddit.org/post/18642154/8860187

[–] airportline@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

By the way, Whitewind requires you to accept their privacy policy just to read a blog post.

This is what it looks like.

You can use this website to bypass it.

Here is a link for the blog post you just cited.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You could paste the link into pdsls.dev as well to see the record :P
https://pdsls.dev/at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/com.whtwnd.blog.entry/3lo7a2a4qxg2l

direct PDS link https://pds.robocracy.org/xrpc/com.atproto.repo.getRecord?repo=did%3Aplc%3A44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz&collection=com.whtwnd.blog.entry&rkey=3lo7a2a4qxg2l

[–] airportline@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I didn't know you could do this.

Amazing lol

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I cant even see this text without agreeing to a ToS and I'm simply not doing that.

I'm not at all an expert on the subject, but I would ask: if it's so easy and cheap, why aren't more people hosting them? As far as I can tell there are only a handful in existence.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

https://whtwnd.nat.vg/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l from airportline@lemmy.zip

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Edited the link to https://whtwnd.nat.vg/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l thanks to @airportline@lemmy.zip comment above

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Piefed is cheap to host too, but only a few people host instances.

I just learned about Blacksky which is independent from Bluesky but uses ATProto

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

PieFed is much newer, has many many MANY fewer users, and seems to already have many more instances.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

https://github.com/mary-ext/atproto-scraping/
Piefed has fewer instances, really.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

It's a bit surprising as it seems you already provided that link recently: https://feddit.org/post/18498447/8800070

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All of these links just lead to blank pages.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Checking this one: blacksky.app

It returns this:

spoiler (click to show)

    )      )        *         )    (           
 ( /(   ( /(      (  `     ( /(    )\ )        
 )\())  )\())     )\))(    )\())  (()/(   (    
((_)\  ((_)\     ((_)()\  ((_)\    /(_))  )\   
 _((_)   ((_)    (_()((_)   ((_)  (_))   ((_)  
| \| |  / _ \    |  \/  |  / _ \  | _ \  | __| 
| .` | | (_) |   | |\/| | | (_) | |   /  | _|  
|_|\_|  \___/    |_|  |_|  \___/  |_|_\  |___| 
                                               
 (         )            (                     (                    )                  )        
 )\ )   ( /(            )\ )    *   )         )\ )      *   )   ( /(       *   )   ( /(        
(()/(   )\())  (   (   (()/(  ` )  /(   (    (()/(    ` )  /(   )\())    ` )  /(   )\())  (    
 /(_)) ((_)\   )\  )\   /(_))  ( )(_))  )\    /(_))    ( )(_)) ((_)\      ( )(_)) ((_)\   )\   
(_))    _((_) ((_)((_) (_))   (_(_())  ((_)  (_))     (_(_())    ((_)    (_(_())   _((_) ((_)  
|_ _|  | \| | \ \ / /  |_ _|  |_   _|  | __| / __|    |_   _|   / _ \    |_   _|  | || | | __| 
 | |   | .` |  \ V /    | |     | |    | _|  \__ \      | |    | (_) |     | |    | __ | | _|  
|___|  |_|\_|   \_/    |___|    |_|    |___| |___/      |_|     \___/      |_|    |_||_| |___| 
                                                                                               
            )       )        )      )                    
   (     ( /(    ( /(     ( /(   ( /(             *   )  
   )\    )\())   )\())    )\())  )\())      (   ` )  /(  
 (((_)  ((_)\   ((_)\   |((_)\  ((_)\       )\   ( )(_)) 
 )\___    ((_)    ((_)  |_ ((_)   ((_)   _ ((_) (_(_())  
((/ __|  / _ \   / _ \  | |/ /   / _ \  | | | | |_   _|  
 | (__  | (_) | | (_) |   ' <   | (_) | | |_| |   | |    
  \___|  \___/   \___/   _|\_\   \___/   \___/    |_|   

This is an AT Protocol Personal Data Server (aka, an atproto PDS) operated by Blacksky Algorithms

Most API routes are under /xrpc/

      Code: https://github.com/blacksky-algorithms
   Support: https://opencollective.com/blacksky
  Protocol: https://atproto.com/

which isn't blank, and describes what it is.

That specific repo indexes PDSes only.
If you're looking for something closer to a full instance (like on activitypub) wafrn may interest you, it's a bit more niche though.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

which isn't blank, and describes what it is.

But nothing about what to do with it. What is a prospective user supposed to do with this?

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Go to their preferred appview (like bsky.app, blacksky.community or zeppelin.social) and make an account there.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

https://feddit.org/post/18642154/8860187

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Piefed also has different features than Lemmy, which incites people to start instances.

About the number of ATProto PDS and relays, didn't you already got a much larger list in this comment? https://feddit.org/post/18498447/8800070

https://github.com/mary-ext/atproto-scraping

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you actually click those links there's nothing there.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here how I used it:

Go to https://deer.social/
Click "Create account"
When offered the choice to use a server, select one from the list (I used " bsky.aenead.net " for instance)

Fill the form, get you account validated

Then use it to login on deer.social

Here is my account for instance: https://deer.social/profile/did:plc:yhwzvt4bab4o743dhg5rfctw

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's helpful, thank you. This is something I have deliberately looked for and been unable to find, which is disappointing. I'm happy to admit I was wrong.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

No worries, happy to help!

[–] rimu@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

All this rests on the implied assertion that ATProto is part of the open social web.

I don't know the answer to that and I don't really care to find out.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

I'd say it is, since atproto is, at the very least, open.

[–] wisdomchicken@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

open social web is used here as a descriptive term, to mean the collection of networks that includes activitypub, atproto, nostr (and potentially more like matrix and farcaster, depending on your inclination).

whether open social web is the correct term or not does not really matter, because if it was not than i would simply have to replace it with another term that describes the exact same thing

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Comment explaining how to create an account without any of the Bluesky infra:

https://feddit.org/post/18642154/8860187

Example of independent ATProto platform: https://blackskyweb.xyz/

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Is it "open" sure, but not in any meaningful way as long as 99.99% of users are hosted by the same server.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

The discourse around decentralisation has elevated a form of network architecture that facilitates and contributes to a healthier social internet into a goal into itself.

Big agree with this.