Hey buddy anyone can go review your profile to see the truth about you. Or look at you on mastodon, or really any platform as you are a one trick pony apparently
Firemyth
joined 1 year ago
Technically correct- it didn't as the azove group. It was a few different groups beforehand that was brought together. I don't remember the names off hand but my point still stands. Russia invaded ukraine twice and that is what keeps azov as a relevant force.
Get bent yog- you are a proven propagandist across multiple platforms.
Yeah again. Thanks for making my point. You guys just keep drinking russia one
Yeah?
1st) buzzfeed 2nd) the whole article is talking about the concern that the azov battalion could gain polotical/social favor by fighting for ukraine .. like it did in 2014.
Yes the above battalion was fully of extremists. . Yes right up until the annexation of crimea they had been on a downward trajectory with regard to recruitment, socio and political power. After the intial conflicts in 2014 there was a a resurgence. The us military refused to work with anyone known to have been associated with the battalion and/or far right extremism- so there was kind of a whitewashing that went on internally.
Your war is literally the thing that is giving azov battalion more clout in Ukraine. Whereas if you'd just left it alone ukraine was on track to cleaning up corruption and extremism.
Which is more than likely exactly why russia invaded- the country was headed towards future stability and closer relations to Europe and the west.
I really don't know where he was going with it. I admit it was probably poorly worded but it definitely wasn't what you guys are trying to paint it as. I can speculate-as I've already done.
That's just not true. The azov battalion HAD a problem with it but it was mostly dealt with prior to the current conflict. The rest of what you said is more Russian propaganda
I'm claiming to be able to understand enough plus have a Russian speaking partner to back me.up
The fact that yog is here and you guys are up voting a very well known propagandist is really my point.
What he said was that Russians aren't like Ukrainians. More Asian than Ukrainians are and that they think differently.
Context is important and your poorly translated version is NOT what he's saying. He's not saying all Asians are subhuman- he's saying they have a different past and are influenced by it. He's saying Russians are more violent based on where they come from and the past they've had. This is something he hadn't counted on etc.. etc.. etc.. since this is just a clip I don't know where he was going with it. But it sounds more like he saying ukrainian military is more humane with regards to how they treat people than the russians.
MY point is that you and your type will just say a thing based purely on propaganda.
I've seen one article parroted by Russian propaganda engines saying thus. Never seen a video or any other sources saying it.
Like I said feel free to look at his history. I mean the literal hundreds of propaganda posts he puts out there speaks for itself. Anyway thus has been fun. You guys prove the point that your only here for the ruzzian propaganda. Enjoy your echo chamber