Exusgu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Exusgu@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Should work, at least as far as the latency is concerned. Faster ram can be accessed at slower speeds.

[–] Exusgu@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Here "arbeit" translates to "job" better than "labour". One provides the job, the other takes the job (and consequently does the labour).

[–] Exusgu@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I much prefer the UI and it (used to?) allow uploading my own music where the offering was lacking. Notably, Spotify also didn't have these songs, so having them in one library is great. The recommendations are also spot on for me, but like you said that could be attributed to having used it for a long while (used Play Music pretty much from its inception).

Considering I'd want to pay to get rid of ads on YouTube too having the music service bundled is a bonus. I used to pay for the music service standalone before that.

I bet that Spotify will do just fine now, although last time I tried (some time last year) I didn't immediately like the UI, and the shuffle seemed to work oddly in large playlists. What it does have over YT Music for sure is integrations with other parties, I wish YT was better in that regard.

[–] Exusgu@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm personally a fan of YT Music, glad we've got some options though!

[–] Exusgu@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Oddly enough, the "lite" subscription was introduced in some other countries during the time they shut it off in the launch countries.

I wonder if they're testing willingness to spend using the cheaper sub, then pulling it if it turns out people are likely to buy the pricier plan once the lower tier isn't available anymore?