It wasn't that he didn't secure the gun. It's that he gifted it to the teen directly.
Entertainmeonly
joined 1 year ago
I read this as;
FUUKA HYUUU!
Didn't they use large doses of nicotine?
What the fuck did I just watch?
It's been that way for years too. Twenty five years ago my friends and I referred to the area as Sadia Aurora cause it always felt like a war zone.
Ya, he identifies as a non-bald man. He had gender affirming care to make sure his hair is there and full.
Is your name Inigo Montoya by any chance?
Some people enjoy being groped by mutant hands.
FTFY
I miss the 90s. Like, it was only a few years ago, right?
Life can definitely be absurd at times.
Animal Farm Vibes
It does matter. The teenager was the owner. Even if the gun was secure it would have been accessible to the teenager. The gun was gifted to the teenager and that is the problem. The teenager should not have position of a fire arm, that we both agree on. Stating that the gun should have been secure completely ignores the actual scenario here.