DonPiano

Ja Herr Datenschutzbeauftragter, dieser Kommentar hier!

Those of us are wrong, then. Fascism isn't some inherently abstract force of nature, it's people and organizations of people. Those social structures can be disrupted, and the major question whose answer determines the means of disruption is whether the earlier responses were appropriately timed and powered.

I prefer the situation where fascist-attitude people are individuals who need treatment rather than one where fascism is not just an attitude of individuals but a structural problem requiring e.g. law enforcement involvement or even a full-societal issue requiring outside military involvement.

Didn't they largely leave to join the BSW querfront? I actually don't know the numbers, but at least some of the more prominent RF aligned people left the Left.

The ease with which they can build such structures would go down. Building while hiding is harder than building while not having to hide.

Having central coordination, for example in the form of a party or some other form of organization, means that strategic goals can be planned for and resources acquired and allocated in a more efficient manner. The previous bigger neonazi party, the NPD, fulfilled that role for quite a while.

Organizations and people are not that interchangeable for these purposes. Workflows, institutional memory, leadership all matter. That's why targeted assassinations of leadership even in cell-like structures can meaningfully disrupt e.g. terrorist organizations' effectiveness. Similar things can be accomplished by simply disrupting business-as-usual.

ed is the standard text editor.

Ich wuerd keine plagiarized information synthesis systems verwenden. Lieber in paint schlecht zeichnen als das.

Idee okay, aber in der Umsetzung dann KI-Schrott.

Why not both:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02850-w

This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.

Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.

AI != LLM

I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.

If it's worth doing, do it properly.

Yes.