Absolute chad.
(Mandatory disclaimer that I actually think the anti-GUI jerk goes too far)
CanadaPlus
joined 2 years ago
I'm absolutely fascinated if somebody can point me to that.
How well did it render most sites, compared to the other CLI browsers?
Nice! I knew it had to be a thing.
I mean, I've never seen a toucan, or even been close to one to my knowledge, but I feel like I understand them pretty well, at least at a basic level. I've also never known any bird except through smell, sound, touch, sight and so on.
They do still suck at physical tasks, and probably will until we find a totally different approach to the problem than brute gradient decent, but I'm not so sure that makes everything else they (appear to) know useless. I'm not convinced kinetic knowledge is the only kind.
The human exceptionalism runs strong. At best, you can argue that this specific machine isn't thinking. Once you say no machine could do it, you're forgetting that you too are stardust.
I get accused of falling to the ELIZA effect, but I suspect some of the critics are driven by something like hubris.
Did you do much browsing? Lynx is a thing, but it can't do JavaScript.
Come to think of it, is there a CLI Lemmy client?
Blasphemy! And also I'm poor, although I guess if I really wanted to run spyware as my kernel I could pirate it.
But yeah, I'm getting the sense those are the two games in town, Linux-wise.
Lol, it's not so good at multiple faces, is it? Still, bravo.
Third options?
Thanks, subbed.
Yeah. For reference, they made a model with a back door, and then trained it to not respond in a backdoored way when it hasn't been triggered. It worked but it didn't effect the back door much, and that means that it technically was acting more differently - and therefore deceptively - when not triggered.
Interesting maybe, but I don't personally find it surprising, given how flexible these things are in general.