No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).
So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.
in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.
Wanted to see this since a long time ! Do you have a source ? Please ?
Unless maybe you are talking about this :
Zero-point energy
Thanks for explaining in simple words things that are out of my reach.
I couldn't understand the first equation in that article (which has 148 equations) : Hamiltonian formulation of gravity as a spontaneously-broken gauge theory of the Lorentz group by Tom Zlosnik.
I read through the blog post you linked from Dr. Pavel Kroupa, The Dark Matter Crisis which is more easy to understand.
From that blog I get that an explanation of the cosmos without the Big Bang is far from the main focus now.
Before writing to you, I was already convinced MOND is superior to LCDM and this for the same reasons you give in your comments and some more.
I hope in the next decades we will see consistent cosmology theories not only without dark matter but also without a big bang.
P.S. : You might like this :
A non-Standard model, David Merritt, Aeon Magazine, July 2021
Could MOND (or RMOND) allow the description of the cosmos without any big bang ?
I do not work in this field but I read quite a bit and I'm interested.
From the sidebar of the main page of lemmy.world, so :
That 76% was 2 hours ago, now at 74%
Up time 76% on lemmy.world // last 24h.
No message from any of their admis.
Outside attack : usual shitheads.
And if ~~LM~~ LW fails, they will attack the next big one.
Edit #1 : LM is Lemmy.world
Edit #2 : oups LW ... not LM
Edit #3 : Lemmy.World status
Edit #4 : from 4am utc //24h :
Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.