this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
543 points (94.1% liked)

You Should Know

33205 readers
91 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the past, laminated glass was usually installed in the windshield, with side and rear windows being tempered only.

The difference is that tempered glass is per-stressed so that when it cracks, it shatters into many tiny and dull pieces. Laminated is the same thing, but with layers of plastic sandwiched with layers of tempered glass. Laminated glass will still shatter, but will be held together by the plastic layers.

In an emergency, small improvised, or purpose built tools meant to shatter tempered glass will be useless if the glass is laminated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 183 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

The problem wasn't the glass.

The problem was using wtf touchscreen controls to shift between drive and reverse. Mrs. Chao confused the two then died.

Shitty UI kills another person. Tesla fucking up basic UI design is the real villain here.

[–] HogsTooth@lemmy.world 91 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I still blame Jeep for thinking a rotating selector was a good idea for a gear shifter. RIP Anton Yelchin.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I thought his jeep issue was that P on the dial didn't actually guarantee the parking pawl was engaged to stop it from rolling. Separate from the lack of positive engagement with the P position, more about the physical disconnect between the two. Unless that was just the non-offensive language version of "user didn't turn the dial all the way and our polite warning chime was too polite"

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

At least you can still feel the rotating Jeep shitty gear selector.

Touchscreen controls on a Tesla have no feel or feedback. It's a touchscreen.

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like both things are a problem?

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm more inclined to blame Tesla's electronic locks and confusing manual override before blaming the windows though

Quick, do you know which panel to remove to find the non-electronic manual override in a Tesla? Car is sinking fast and the electronics just shorted out from the lake.

But sure, tons of bad design decisions here. It's hard to blame any one of them as the singular cause. If Tesla had easier to use manual override doors instead of electronic locks, if the windows could be broken, if the screen wasn't a confusing touchscreen mess, etc. Etc. Lots of factors and all are the cause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Probably doesn't help that Teslas guess which direction you want to go in and you have to change it if it's wrong. https://www.autoblog.com/2021/01/28/tesla-new-gear-shifter-guesses-direction-you-want/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

she could have not floored it into a lake, but maybe I'm the only person that doesn't go balls out when they're backing out of a spot.

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (20 children)

Accidents happen, and people panic. Maybe she thought she was pressing the breaks and made the problem worse. I highly doubt anyone would do it intentionally.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 20 points 8 months ago

I don't know about you, but in these parts we spin the gear selector to random, floor it and yell "JESUS TAKE THE WHEEL!"

[–] yildolw@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Hertz stopped offering Tesla rentals because Teslas are designed to go balls out when the pedal is lightly touched and too often that involves straight into a wall or a lake

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 114 points 8 months ago (3 children)

it shatters into many tiny and dull pieces

Those pieces are not dull. They're just not jagged and shaped like knives like normal glass. I accidentally broke the rear window on my truck and, thinking it was dull like you described, started to pick it up with my hands. Big mistake.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You just unlocked a very unpleasant memory of picking up small glass pieces with my hand. Like you said, big mistake and the worst was that I didn't notice it was cutting at first...

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One time I was climbing a rock in a park in Illinois, and reached up into a pile of finely-ground glass.

I managed to pick all but one little piece out of my fingers. That one piece was so far in I couldn’t get it.

Later on, I couldn’t find it. So I figured it had come out.

But a few weeks later my palm itched and that fucking piece of glass poked its way out of my palm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago

Yeah, they're absolutely sharp. But since they're not point, you'll end with a hundred tiny cuts, instead of a giant shard stabbing through your torso..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 105 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (20 children)

This is astroturfing.

The issue with Tesla has never been that the windows are hard to break. The issue is that the rear doors are electronic with manual override hidden in a camouflaged panel at the bottom of the door pocket. A door pocket that was added to hold things. Those things will block access to the emergency door open.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If you're underwater you're not gonna be able to open the doors without breaking the window unless there's an explosive. But partially submerged when 20% of the door is still above water then yes it should be possible to still open the door

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But partially submerged when 20% of the door is still above water then yes it should be possible to still open the door

Partially submerged, the door would be very hard to open, due to water pressure. The water pressure needs to fully equalized between the inside and outside of the car.

Did we learn nothing from Mythbusters?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As Mythbusters proved, you wait until the car is almost full of water, and then open the door.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Not quite. There is a period where water pressure hasn't built up enough to stop you. They were specifically testing pressure equalization, not that you should wait as a first course of action.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 12 points 8 months ago

This is coming up because of the recent drowning, right? Is someone saying the driver was unable to escape because she was unable to open a back door? It would make sense of there was an issue with rescuers unable to break rear windows, but how is the inaccessibility of the internal rear door emergency open cord relevant to this case?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 88 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Good news for 2023 Honda HRV owners, because the rear glass shatters spontaneously on its own.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Kia/Hyundai from 2011 to 2022 have that beat with their entirely key less ignition and universal free ride share program.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 56 points 8 months ago

We need HARD rules and regulations for car door handles and common controls. This push for screens and lack physical elements needs to stop.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

And Tesla, being the helpful sort, also makes it hard to open the doors in an emergency. The front might have manual door release mechanism somewhere - good luck finding it when the car is on fire or sinking. The rear... not so much.

EuroNCAP is changing its testing regime to negatively score manufacturers who remove critical physical controls and it should probably include door handles in that regime.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I feel they should outright ban them from sale, not just reduce the score.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not that I disagree with you generally, but in the recent case, manual door release wouldn't have helped, as it's basically impossible to push open a car door against the water pressure outside a submerged car.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, you wait for pressure to equalize. But in a Tesla after pressure has equalized and you could open the rear door, the manual rear seat door open is a pull string under a camouflaged panel at the bottom of the door pocket. A door pocket that is probably filled with stuff because Tesla added the door pocket so you can put stuff in it.

It's intentionally designed to be unsafe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's still possible to open it before the car submerges. It's also possible to open it if you have the wherewithal to wait until the inside is nearly full. That's providing you know where the damned release lever is. But if you're panicking and pushing the electronic release and nothing happens then you're going to die no matter what. Same too if the car is on fire or whatever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Wasn't it also the door opening mechanism was electronic and it stopped functioning once underwater?

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even a purely mechanical door can be extremely difficult to open when partially submerged. The pressure of the water will hold the door shut until the water equalizes on both sides of the door.

But yeah, once totally submerged and flooded an electric door likely won’t open while a mechanical one will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

There is apparently a manual lever hidden underneath the button, but that sure does seem like a bad design idea in an emergency.

[–] iAmNotorious@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I hate Tesla and traded mine in after only two months of ownership, but in no way is the lever hidden or not extremely obvious. In fact it is more obvious than the button. Several times I had passengers try to use the manual lever, which doesn't lower the window when used. After the second person did it, moving forward I told every person who hadn't been in my car before to use the button before getting out. Was one of the many reasons I traded it in.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (14 children)

There is apparently a manual lever hidden underneath the button,

"hidden"

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago (24 children)

You're not breaking a tempered glass without the designated tool either and almost nobody has that. There's this famous clip of a news anchor demonstrating how "easy" it is to break a car window with a hammer and he needed like 8 attempts.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 17 points 8 months ago

The reason Tesla was in the news over this was because a rich lady reversed into a pond. So the rear windows wouldn't be facing up in that situation...

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Why did they switch to laminated in the side and rear windows?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tempered glass windows offer better theft protection which is why they are increasingly used.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Laminated*

They're used for noise insulation not theft. In theft it's just a minor inconvenience. Shatter the window with a rock, then punch the floppy laminated shards in.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

No, more often, it's smash the laminated window, get confused and then smash another window. If the 2nd window isn't laminated, they're in, if it is laminated too, then they smash your quarter glass since they're basically never laminated.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Anyone know of a reasonable tool that can get through laminated glass and be kept near the drivers seat?

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›