this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1669 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

60074 readers
3541 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can't even seek through songs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 546 points 1 year ago (55 children)

https://medium.com/brain-labs/why-spotify-struggles-to-make-money-from-music-streaming-ba940fc56ebd

For anyone wanting to rage at Spotify, I'd remind you that Spotify has never actually turned a profit. They lose money on every single paid user, and even more on free users. Tl;dr of the article (sorry for the account-wall) is that Spotify is contractually obligated to give around 70% of every dollar it makes to the labels, who then eat most of it and give a few crumbs to the artists. If you want to support artists, buy their merch, their physical albums, and go to their shows. If they're independent, they may actually see some non-trivial revenue from streaming as well.

Spotify may also be contractually restricted in what level of access they can offer for free - licensing can be very messy - and they also do need to create enough incentive to actually make the paid tier worth it. Given that a month of access to essentially all music ever costs about as much as a single CD did back in the day, it feels like pretty incredible value to me, personally. Yes, you can of course always pirate if you want to deal with the hassle of that, but you should at least keep it in the back of your mind that, if everyone did that, we wouldn't have any music to enjoy at all. If the cost of streaming or buying music is genuinely a burden, I wouldn't blame you that much for pirating, but if you can afford it, I do think the value really is there, if only to avoid the sheer hassle of pirating and managing a local library. And if you really think that streaming is just uniquely corrupt and terrible, CDs haven't gone anywhere.

But if you can easily afford to pay for music and you still refuse to, at least have the honesty to just admit that you want to get things for free and you don't care about anyone involved in creating it getting paid for it, without dressing it up as some kind of morally righteous anti-capitalist crusade. It's normal to be annoyed about having to pay for things; we all are, and we all want to get things for free. Just admit that instead of pretending your true motivation is anything deeper.

[–] ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world 214 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Holy shit, an actually reasonable take on Lemmy regarding subscription services. I genuinely couldn't believe what I was reading and was waiting for the "LOL, JK! Pirate everything, they don't deserve my money and fuck every ad and paid service ine the universe."

Thank you!

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

ngl, I was expecting to enjoy roasting in downvote hell, so this has been a pleasant surprise haha.

I think a lot this stuff winds up people taking the bad feeling of paying for a thing, which is course completely normal, and twisting it into them somehow being personally wronged rather than simply accepting that yeah, spending money feels bad.

That said, if there is an obvious bad guy in this story, it's pretty clearly the labels, and given how unimportant radio and traditional music marketing is becoming, I would love to see more and more artists operate independently or with small labels and see the oligopoly of the Big 3 fall apart. They may have been somewhat necessary 80 years ago, but nowadays, they simply don't provide anywhere near as much value as they suck up.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Some subscriptions make sense for the consumer, or at least justifiable.

IMO a music service like Spotify is absolutely one of them.

Turning heated seats in a subscription? Burn in hell.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Yes, you can of course always pirate if you want to deal with the hassle of that, but you should at least keep it in the back of your mind that, if everyone did that, we wouldn't have any music to enjoy at all.

This is bunk. If people pirated the record labels out of business we would have less music sure, but there will always be people who make music for the love of the craft, rather than just to line an executive's pocket.

I'm all for directly supporting artists (and I buy albums and merch directly from the band wherever possible), but let's not pretend like the people pulling the strings aren't also responsible for the shitty situation they're in.

Fuck the recording industry and how they treat artists. And I say that as a premium streaming service customer.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The amount of it would still be dramatically reduced. Those people who are making music solely for the love of it already exist today and people are perfectly welcome to listen to them; nothing is stopping them at all.

I think it's probably safe to say that the vast majority of music that is listened to today would not exist if the artists couldn't financially support themselves from it. Do you really disagree with that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

we have a family subscription (12€/mo.?) in our household, and i would probably not go back to pirating music anytime soon. they offer genuinely great features and from your post, they don't seem to be the bad guy here. anyway, if it's not shutting down in the next couple of months, i'll keep using it. but they do neet to get some FLACs onto there soon.

if there existed something like spotify for video streaming, i probably wouldn't even pirate movies right now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

These aren't the only options. I've gotten into Bandcamp and it's great because I can listen to an album multiple times before deciding if I want to buy it. Then when I do, I get a DRM-free FLAC copy to keep forever, and a much larger portion of money goes to the artist.

Sure it doesn't have the extreme catalog of Spotify or things like social playlists. It's very album-based (which I like personally) and takes a little more effort to choose what you listen to. But I've had no difficulty discovering new artists and great tunes.

Of course the company has problems too. The new buyer just laid off half the staff and says they won't recognize the union, so we'll see how it fares. But even if it goes under, I keep the music I bought.

[–] Flipper@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You'll hate to hear what is currently happening with Bandcamp.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)
[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 181 points 1 year ago (30 children)

Well, if you don't pay with money, you're paying with your attention. Do you think they create this huge service just for funsies?

Tbf, out of all media streaming services across movies, series, and music, Spotify has the highes bang-for-your-buck. It's still like Netflix at that time when there was only Netflix and you could watch almost everything on one platform. I still buy records that I like on physical media like vinyl, but Spotify is such a great deal for convenient listening to all music out there.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Man these people forget the days when a month of Spotify would afford you 1 CD. I remember cause I would spend half my paycheck on music. I'm just sitting here happy for services like Spotify and YouTube in my life. I remember a time when music and information was much harder to obtain (even illegally).

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But if you bought the CD you actually owned something. Stop paying for the services and you have nothing if all you used was spotify/YouTube/pandora. I gave up on paying for streaming years ago and spend the same amount monthly on purchasing music. I get CDs, either new or used. I’ve amassed a collection and I don’t need Internet or monthly charges to play them.

But I don't want to own it. I don't want to amass a collection of CDs taking up space somewhere. Been there, done that. I have a large collection of ripped mp3s from CDs I bought in the 90s and early 2000s (I've long since disposed of the physical media). I haven't clicked on a single one of them in years, I just keep them for nostalgia sake and because they take relatively little space.

I just occasionally want to listen to music sans commercials or annoying DJs wasting my time. For the cost of 1 CD a month my entire family can listen to almost anything they desire, at any time, without hassles (on Pandora in our case but I assume the economics are similar).

Same thing with movies, honestly. I watch them once and move on. There's a small handful I like enough to rewatch and I do own those.

I get the whole, we don't own anything anymore, argument and I mostly agree with it (see my massive Steam library). I just want both options to be viable. Streaming for ephemeral entertainment and actual ownership for the things I choose to keep.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I know not everyone will agree, but I think YouTube premium is the better bang-for-buck service. $3 more per month than Spotify and includes YouTube Music premium and YouTube Premium. So all the music and ad-free YouTube.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago (9 children)

What a shame it would be if this drove more people into using those awful cracked versions of the Spotify apk that give you most of the premium features without a premium account. Truly the godless heathens over at xManager (https://github.com/Team-xManager/xManager) must be rejoicing over this.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 117 points 1 year ago (40 children)

Who tf uses Spotify without a premium account?

I'd rather pirate that shit that use it for free (I like to hit next all the way).

IMHO Spotify is one of the few services that it is worth to pay.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago (46 children)

I have the family premium plan and honestly love it. I haven’t downloaded an mp3 in years because Spotify is so convenient. As far as subscription services go, this one is top tier for me.

Now when we look at movie streaming.. well that’s what the music streaming could have been like. What an absolute mess.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Now if only they'd pay the musicians worth a shit. Maybe they should strike next.

Full disclosure I am on Spotify family plan and I love it because

It would be nice if companies didn't slash features and would offer music for free with features beyond that of broadcast radio.

It would be nice if we didn't have the mechanisms demanding infinite growth from companies because sometimes that's just not possible or even necessary.

Imagine if Spotify could just be like ok, yeah we're good no need to make major changes, everyone is happy, life is good thanks. Versus: oh shit we need to boost the quarterly numbers who can we fuck over to get there? I know, customers and musicians both! Yay!

[–] thisNotMyName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

if only they’d pay the musicians worth a shit<

afaik that's mainly the fault of the music labels, they charge quite good money, but they don't give it to the artists: https://blog.groover.co/en/tips/loud-clear-spotify-2/

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Enshittification everywhere. Selfhosting forever

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iamgoingberserkk@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I've been using Spotify for almost 2-3 years. The only thing I can say is the app gets DEGRADED EVERY YEAR!!!! They do their best to bring more and more bugs with each update. I'm done with Spotify shit, also they removed a lot of regional songs from my country. The only reason I pay for Spotify is because I can download/rip their music and store it on my Plex Server.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 year ago (30 children)

Spotify in on itself is worth paying for BUT...

Their app for android sucks blue donkey balls and I'd happily pay more if I'd get to use a slightly less retarded cousin of this app.

The other but:

Spotify in on itself is not very bad right now and basically could and SHOULD continue as-is forever.

However, the economic system as it currently is requires it to continually come up with new crap that nobody needs nor wants (see also all Microsoft software that went from absolute shit thirty years ago to absolute slimey shit with lots of useless but pretty ding dong bells attached to it with a nice camera hidden inside to spy on the insides of your butthole) and it only a matter of time before...

Some exec gets hired there that promises to double their revenue, then implements some shit that will double their revenue once, gets this exec his bonus upon which he immediately quits to go to the next company to fuck over with a pineapple, leaving Spotify with a huge exodus of users, a dwindling service, and two years later it's dead.

I've seen this cycle with too many large companies, and it's the same story over and over. Be it Boeing, Disney, just about all large game companies, etc etc..

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 67 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So they went to the same model Pandora used to use 15 years ago

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Putting all the best features behind a paywall, opening up ad space as well as sponsored song spots... Where have I seen this before?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This is literally just commercial radio.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (15 children)

This is enshittification 101

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ClemaX@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was already like this in Europe when I began to use Spotify in 2015. I do not hate it because the app's free tier is already unusable to me due to the adverts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] small44@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

The free version is completely useless on smartphone. I hope the limitations won't come to the desktop version

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tech Bros, reinventing classic technology with a veneer of techno babble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (21 children)

I don't mind paying for music

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When I was a kid, I would go buy a CD basically every paycheck/allowance, for probably around $15-$20 of '03 money. 12ish tracks. I would add basically about 30 tracks to my collection per month for $30-$40. And even though I owned those (as long as my little brother didn't fuck up the disc), I could only access the handful that I could carry with me. If you told 15-17 year old me, that for $11 a month I could access basically any music I could think of instantly, anywhere, I would've been like "sure, and then we'll listen in our flying cars, right?"

There are lots of things that absolutely suck about modern life and the enshittification presented here, but music fans have it pretty good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] loftkey@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Spotify is garbage, last time I used it it was missing basic features like sleep timer, play count, song rating, and history. I buy my music and use poweramp instead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jikal@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

They just need to add commercials for Premium that have horns or police sirens and they'll be all set

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought this was always how the free version was? Which bit of that is new? I remember only being able to shuffle play until I got premium

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Someology@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Spotify is now a Pandora knockoff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Netflix and other streaming services, despite supposedly saving us from cable, re-invented cable.

But the good news is, maybe it's time to get the good old iPods/DAPs back into the mainstream again. You can have a big SD card with all the music and podcasts you could ever want without tying yourself to a specific service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I tried it free once, and found it generally unusable.

Like it was filled with annoying adverts, but it wasn't adverts for other people. It was adverts for itself. All overly chipper voice actors going "Wow, is it true that Spotify Premium is just £9.99 a month?" as if that's how anybody has ever talked in the history of humankind.

The free version is funded by paying customers. The only purpose it has is to annoy you into paying.

I was happy to use Amazon Prime's version for a bit, and then they decided that merely paying for Prime wasn't enough, and I had to pay special extra fees to listen to albums. So I got Spotify instead, because fuck giving more money to Amazon.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Siririus@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago

All these companies want to control what content you consume. Just walk away.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I know Plex gets a lot of crap here, but they have done me no wrong allowing me to simply play the music I like. Spotify is ruining artist discovery, which is exactly how radio became the shithole it is now. At least Pandora leads at artist discovery.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Use Spotube. It isnt have these limitations. You get premium spotify for free 😆 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=oss.krtirtho.spotube

Plz spread the word, it is the only way we can move them to right way, if they feel it...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"changed"? More like "removed"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›