this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
902 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org archive.today web.archive.org

About the only way we're going to actually have a democracy is if they consistently lose elections. That's going to mean volunteering, donating, and actually turning out to vote

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 148 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I guess I got to be the first year to say it: this is fucking horrible, and we have to do everything we can in our power to stop this.

[–] Blooper@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

The comment directly below this one reads like propaganda straight from Moscow. I'm very glad to see it down-voted. Blaming blatant authoritarianism and extremely dangerous rhetoric on "old people" seems like a pretty obvious diversion from the actual culprits: the entire Republican party who is sleepwalking into a legit second coup attempt. They're losing political power and have abandoned the idea of democracy. The fact that they're unable or unwilling to drown this Nazi rhetoric in the bathtub speaks volumes. They are openly supporting authoritarianism. Not "old people". Republicans.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 126 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Posobiec, who helped popularize the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory, appeared at CPAC’s opening day on Wednesday. He spoke during a panel moderated by former White House adviser and white supremacist Steve Bannon.

They’re not sending their brightest, folks. Many such examples.

Seriously though, I didn’t have a pizzagate guy openly advocating fascism at CPAC on my doomsday bingo card, yet here we are.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 9 months ago (7 children)

There's a non-zero chance that they actually are sending their brightest.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 104 points 9 months ago (7 children)

"We didn’t get all the way there on January 6, but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this, right here,” he said, gesturing to the crowd and holding up his fist.

Isn't it the way to get some alphabet agency on your ass? Dude doesn't only speak Jan 6 was a coup, he encourage people to do it again.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's unbelievable that someone says this AND it is found to far exceed the speech and debate clause AND is held to account.

But then, most authoritarian leaders are initially I stalled under cheers of their own population. And mostly people know what they are voting for. The MAGA crowd seems to just be more open about it.

Just recently Indonesia voted for a guy who literally murdered his fellow countrymen as head of a special forces unit. But the youth think his TikTok dance is Soo cute, so they vote for the sweet grandpa with the cute dance. I hope they will be alright.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

But the youth think his TikTok dance is Soo cute, so they vote for the sweet grandpa with the cute dance.

Excuse me, wtf, how it's even real: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dRF4nUIRAAA

[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Prabowo is a fucking monster, and much like other worldwide monsters, he was trained at Fort Bragg by US special forces.

Then even The US said "This guy is too war crimey even for us. We're going to deport you, but do keep in touch. Especially about those East Timor rebels. They look suspiciously anti-capitalist".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Neon_Shadow@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Some of those who work forces...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Sir this is a conservative oligarchy not a Wendy's. Rules are only for anyone we declare to be too far left.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Teon@kbin.social 85 points 9 months ago (42 children)

Republicans are criminals, cheaters, liars and traitors.
And I have proof, just watch and listen to everything they do.
They HATE America and want to rule it with a sick 2000 year old genocidal religion.
Always vote for the candidate to does things to help Americans, and chooses human rights over fascist control laws.

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 77 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Isn't this what the second amendment is actually for?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 64 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

it’s what the whole fucking constitution is for

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

The second amendment tells you what it's for - militias. But what are militias for? The constitution tells us that too.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 15: [The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.

So, no, the second amendment is about a system to suppress insurrections, not commit them. You've been lied to.

We have revolutions every 2-4 years. Insurrections are not about the will of the people, they are about subverting the will of the people.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

And the way the winds blowing is why the #1 demographic for first time firearm purchasers throughout covid has been liberals.

[–] himmyguap@lemmy.world 75 points 9 months ago
[–] anon987@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Time to start killing fascists.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Italian here, sometimes I wonder why we ever stopped, it should be an ongoing thing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I used to get scared to talk about weed on the phone. You don't disparage a public figure with a hint of violence for fear...

How TF is this not enough to lock these motherfuckers up? This is the God damn United States of America and these treasonists are threatening our government. Fuck "soft Democrats" - this isn't about policy. These criminals are promising a coup against our democracy. Why aren't they in jail? I'm seriously asking. Where the fuck is law enforcement????

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 40 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There are a bunch of Supreme Court rulings which basically said the KKK can advocate for violence in general so long as they don't lay out specifics. That's what these folks hide behind

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, as long as they're abiding by the rigorous standards of the KKK then. Clearly an upstanding group of people to emulate.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit. When was that??

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The biggie is Brandenburg vs Ohio, from 1969

Where that really falls down is when you have social media algorithms selectively showing inflammatory speech to the audience most likely to act on it. This means that inflammatory speech which wouldn't have caused violence in the 1960s is incredibly likely to do so now.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

Republicans, the party of treason.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 41 points 9 months ago

"That probably sounded better in the original German." -- Molly Ivins.

[–] don@lemm.ee 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wonder what they’d do if we started proclaiming and raucously celebrating “The End of the Republic”.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago

Lmao I can imagine some of them are thinking democracy = democrats.

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

These idiots probably only associate democracy with democrats so they cheer

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No, they know exactly what they're cheering for.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll take him at his word. I don't doubt he'd follow through with what he's saying.

But also the headline sucks. He has a heavy sarcasm to his voice like he's mocking liberal's and the media's portrayal of him and "rabid cheers" isn't how I would describe the sound of the reaction in the video.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Yeah this is the same kind of thing they did at another one of these events in the past with the whole "Ladies and gentlemen, we are all domestic terrorists." thing. It was meant as a joke to make fun of what the liberals were saying but at the same time it wasn't entirely inaccurate.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck is this a thing

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They want a crowd and they cheer the thrill of battle. Because they believe they are on the right side.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I still can't understand how the political left could accept that their opponents dub themselves "right". Do they not understand that "right" also means "correct"? It's a marketing failure from the get go, regardless of etymology. We should start calling the political right something different, like "wrong". Or "party of assholes". Change my view.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Does anyone have a link to this actual speech, whenever I hear something this damning, I assume something is wildly out of context.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (46 children)

Here you go.

LIVE REPLAY: CPAC Day Two 4:48:38

edit: never mind, that is his CPAC speech where he promises to destroy to democracy

edit: People only seem to be reporting on the clip linked in the article that was of the panel in that conference room. There doesn't seem to be a recording of the entire panel online currently.

load more comments (46 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.

  • Will Durant
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 23 points 9 months ago

200 years ago, there would be a rope shortage right about now.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Basically MAGA Republicans showing their true faces. They know that they don't have much of a future without cheating or dropping democracy altogether.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

They are taking themselves down.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

This should disqualify any of these people running. These are treasonous bastards who should not be allowed to participate in democratic elections.

load more comments
view more: next ›