I love hyprland and even anime but having waifus prebuilt into the compositor installation is too much.
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
46 points (91.1% liked)
Linux
59667 readers
604 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
GIMP is a very powerful and important piece of software that I wish they weren't so obstinate about giving the worst name ever. I know it's just an acronym, but it is in effect the name of the project. I've taken to calling it GNU IMP instead.
For a while there, there was a fork of GIMP that simply changed the name to Glimpse. That was the only one I felt comfortable mentioning in professional contexts.
Some years ago I got in touch with one of the primary maintainers of that fork in the interest of continuing the project after realizing it was so stagnant, and I was essentially warned that doing so would open myself to immense harassment, and that harassment was why everyone involved stopped with the project in the end. So...what is all of this about "if you don't like X, fork it" if that is what will happen when one does? Seems pretty rotten advice to give if it's just going to be sabotaged anyway. Someone I know still uses the outdated Glimpse regardless.
GNU IMP
Do you have to clarify what you're talking about often?
No more than can be accomplished with the first sentence of my original post.
Why not Gee-IMP?
Isn't imp also kind of demeaning to short people?
No.
Thanks
Absolutely. Reposting from a year ago:
There is a certain strain of open source development that is nearly anti-marketing, as far as I can tell. They choose names like “gimp”, “git”, “frotz”, “borg”, “pooch”, “butt”, “slurm”, “mutt”, “snort”, and “floorp”.
More fool you. There's some damn good software in that list.
I know gimp, git, borg, and mutt, but not the others :)
You forgot scrot.
reminds me of one of the main mbin instances, moist.catsweat.com
Any service or tool with obvious genAI in its branding or the developer's profile is an instant "no" from me. Linkwarden is a big one. Any advertisement post clearly written by an LLM I'll avoid like the plague. If you're willing to use hallucinations based on theft that use unbelievable amounts of water and energy, then I'm flat out not going to trust that your software has any value.
Also seen a handful of random tools with "Proudly made in the USA" or some garbage on the readme, and sure enough the developer always follows all of today's big fascists on social media. Shocker.
Calibre looks like a toddler designed it with a box of broken, half-missing dollar store crayons. I don’t care how great it works, I cannot bring myself to use it.
Would you use the cli?
One of the cool things I liked about calibre is that extensions worked via the cli interface as well, which made it easy to do batch workflows of operations on ebooks.
The dev also made Kitty which I use daily, but its much easier to theme a terminal than a GUI.
Oh my, YES. Before I entered the world of free software, I was turned off by it. Reason is, I thought to myself, hold on: "If it's gratis, then it's going to be at the level of quality of all of these malware-ridden, barely functional, shareware programs." Luckily I'm smarter now, but free software has a branding problem. It results from these programs often being developed by incredibly competent turbo nerds, the result of this is the advertisement reads like a technical manual or a spec sheet.
Proper advertising is helpful. It informs users about what they can do with the programme. They don't care about it being programmed in hyper-efficient C, optimised with hardware acceleration or the underlying mathematical principles of how something is being processed. They care about getting the results they want. Instead of darktable, for example, talking about "4x32-bit floating point pixel buffers", instead, they should talk about what users can use Darktable for. Sell the fantasy of belonging to the best, only thanks to Darktable and getting superior results from the programme. Show people the stunning results that real pros got by using Darktable. Show that there is a real community around the programme, and not just a GitHub repo. These things matter.
Darktable, in my opinion, is the best raw editor out there, and yes, the "4x32-bit floating point pixel buffers" and other incredibly well thought out features are the reason why that is. But 99% of users wouldn't know why these things listed as their features are so massively useful and make Darktable so ridiculously superior compared to the competition.
I genuinely think that if more free software projects would invest in proper advertising and branding, that GNU/Linux and free software on it wouldn't have 3% market share, but would be the monopoly in the computing market.
Edit: GIMP is another perfect example. It has another problem, and not just the name. The website is completely barren. "High Quality Photo Manipulation: GIMP provides the tools needed for high quality image manipulation."
Gimp has not only more features than Adobe Photoshop, but most of them are significantly better. IMO, they need to communicate this and just bundle the extensions. Gimmic is basically tripling the amount of things you can do with it and resynthesiser is a massively useful function to have. "Normies" don't want to fiddle around with plugins. IMHO: The extensions are very good, highly stable and should just be integrated.
See, with nice marketing comes wide recognition, with recognition come normies, and with normies comes the mental burden of dealing with "this doesn't work, the program is shit, fix it immediately!!!!!!!" kinds of issues. Not everyone wants to do it in their spare time.
Also, I have a rudimentary idea how to fix this. So if anyone who's more competent than me would like to have a go at it, please do so.
Basically found a non-profit ad agency for free software. Basically the agency would create turnkey ad and branding concepts for certain free software projects that would like to have it and in return they get 5% of their donations, for example. All of the money gets reinvested back into the advertising for the member software projects. Also, it could be very easy, the ad agency would, in broad strokes, just have a competition parity strategy where they essentially do whatever the competition does, in broad strokes, for their advertising and "just" adapt it to what the free software project needs.
Yes, it's some random "idea guy" on the internet coming up with something that's coherent and smart sounding. So take it for what you will.
Why would a FOSS program, barely able to pay for developers and/or infrastructure give away money for marketing?
It's highly unlikely that the extra users will result in enough donations to even recoup the funds or significant volunteered development.
Some projects that kind of do that come to mind:
Beeper, which is a hosted Matrix server (probably Synapse) with bridges to other messengers, and a client (probably derived from Element?). But it's all called Beeper to be more "normal".
Snikket is a "rebranded" prosody XMPP server, Conversations client for Android and Siskin IM client for iOS. Also, all are Snikket, no scary abbreviations and different app names.
Beeper's old clients (now called beeper cloud) were based on element, but their new ones are fully inhouse.
In a way. I kinda moved away from developing using ReactJS because of its ties to Meta/Facebook.
I am kinda turned off by how awful and hacky it is, but sadly it is used everywhere. And the Facebook ties is another big minus.
RawTherapee and Floorp
No, otherwise I wouldn't have used GNOME in the past. I stopped using it because it changed too much for me not because its logo is a smelly foot. I also think KDE Khas Kterrible Kbranding but I still use it now that I prefer it to GNOME and got bored with MATE.
The weasel humping a ball logo (IceWeasel).
I don't want to have anything to do with GNU TALER.
Gnutella on the other hand... Too bad it wasn't actually open source.
"Italian"?
I meaant italian brainrot, which isn't necessarily supposed to be italian, that's just the name. Some of the worst ai images yet imo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_brainrot
As more of an art and design person than a technical one, yeah almost undoubtedly, though I can't think of specific examples
But I really appreciate the work that goes into a beautiful logo, typography, or UI, and that will often sway me, probably more than it should
Void's beautiful logo/logotype is what originally got me interested in it as a distro, and the only reason I'm not using it now is cause I'm a dummy and minimal distros require I use my brain a lot more than I've thus far been willing to get my computer up and going
who fucking cares
I'm with you - if a program does a good job of what it's set out to do, why avoid it because of a dumb name or less than stellar UI?