this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
235 points (94.3% liked)

Canada

10647 readers
438 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal and provincial governments have been underfunding universities for decades. Recently, universities were able to start recruiting foreign students to make up for the shortfall, but it looks like that money tap will be turned down. It doesn't look like there's a plan to make up for it.

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That'll be tough if universities see their income crater.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 60 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It's funny that our college-like businesses are crutching on foreign students to stay afloat; and if they dry up a bit, people are pissed that they have to find a new way to keep education running as a for-profit business without the understanding that running as such is wrong.

Tax the rich. Run the schools. Go find a Viking nation and ask them how they managed since forever.

[–] honc@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t understand why you would blame universities (calling them college-like businesses), when foreign students were the only option for increased revenue (to even just match inflation) that has been allowed in the last decade. Before that, only tuition increases were allowed, since government funding has been consistently decreasing.

I completely agree that funding for education should be through taxes, but (especially in Ontario), this is the funding that dried up a very long time ago.

Universities are non-profit organizations in Canada (we are not the U.S.) and have been advocating for increasing government funding first and foremost for a long time. Sure, universities have pivoted to fund by whatever the best alternative has been, but otherwise they wouldn’t survive.

The reliance on foreign students was never the preferred option for anyone but the government, and that was only so they could stop funding education. Now that alternative (really a last resort) is being limited by the government as well, so yeah, being pissed about it is reasonable.

Of course a much better option would be, for example, for the provincial government to provide higher government grants for every domestic student and to also provide that grant for more domestic students (most don’t realize this, but there is something called “corridor”, and universities don’t get government funding for domestic students above that government-induced number). These are provincial decisions, btw.

So yes, universities would love to take on more domestic students, and would love for the government to pay for them (and pay more for each), but that’s instead been decreasing for decades. So what’s this magic “new way” that universities are supposed to be trying instead?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In this thread, I'm amazed coin operated lectures have not been suggested.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Exporting education IS taxing the rich. The rich just happen to be from a different country. The majority of those students are paying vast sums of money to these schools to get their education, then going back home after. That money was subsidizing education for Canadian citizens.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

As clearly this thread has no clue what goes on at universities, or even knows the difference between universities and colleges, I'll explain the OPs point.

$1.7B for 1000 scientist is $1.7M each, for 5 years in total. For senior scientists, this covers salary. But now we have 1000 extra grant applications in a system that is funded at 20% the level of the US per capita. This means we will try and recruit Americans, but tell them they will have an under 10% chance of getting any grant money, and that grant size is half a typical NIH or NSF grant. Large projects? Zero. This research has to be done somewhere, which costs universities money. The same universities getting squeezed by frozen tuitions the last 6 years.

So it is a designed bullshit line item. No one will access this because by the time it rolls out to real funds, the US will have reverted funding and going back to trouncing this banana republic. Excellence, why would an established scientists move to a poorly funded system? They will get more done of they just ride the storm in US.

This money goes to cancer and disease research, like lipid nanoparticles that saved millions of lives with COVID vaccines (yes, that came from Canada), or neural network algorithms driving trillions in investment, also from Canada, but we just pissed away that IP to the US for a handful of shiny rocks.

If Carney is serious about CDN productivity, he needs to fund R&D at per capita levels closer to US or China and make sure the result of this research is developed in Canada, not just sold off cheap to the US as per the last 60 years. A decent economist would realize there is tremendous potential return on investment, far higher than subsidies for pickup truck production to US corporations, and certainly more than the 100-150x more we waste on military spending which does nothing for the CDN economy.

This does not affect colleges. They don't do research and are for vocational training.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Centrists and conservatives don’t have the capacity to understand “return on investment” or “in-direct benefits”. Carney is saving money by not paying the bills, so to speak, and that only works until the first of the month rolls around.

I’m so sick of seeing the research and case studies pile up which show all the easy, low-risk solutions to most of our problems just for those morons to bust in and keep doing the same worthless bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yea, this is stupid. One of my clients is a public college, and they're already hurting. They already cut a bunch of programs to save the rest. A new round of international student cuts is going to gut so many more that they just worked so hard to save.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Our politicians are incredibly short sighted. It's amazing that the same budget both defunds universities and says we want to attract the "best and the brightest" to those same universities.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (20 children)

Are we now acting like universities are poor and aren’t gouging the fuck out of everyone?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wtf are you talking about. Tuitions have been frozen in Ontario for 8 years. Laurentian went broke.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're not, really. Their expenses have gone up to match. The days of just teaching with just blackboards are over.

If all expenses are necessary is another question, though. Someone mentioned administration bloat.

I have worked in hospitals and I would imagine it’s a similar situation. The top people make all the money and the nursing and housekeeping staff keep getting shafted and told “there’s no money for you”

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago (5 children)

O boo hoo, Universities don't need unlimited growth. So what if they make less this year than they did last year. They are not hurting, only their unrestricted growth is threatened.

[–] honc@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Universities are non-profit organizations in Canada. I agree that they don’t need unlimited growth, but the consequence of not funding them is a decrease in the quality of education and the country’s ability to be at the forefront of research.

They are absolutely hurting right now, btw. One consequence of this is some (small) amount of improved efficiency, but the reality if this continues is a degradation of post-secondary education.

For example, more and more high school students will struggle to get into good programs, and then eventually, we just won’t have good programs.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I watched my local college lose all its credibility as a result of running borderline scams for foreign students. My old university otoh has been rather smart about not becoming too dependent on foriegn student tuition. I love immigration, and especially think exporting our education is a good thing, but the way these programs have been run in recent years is a cancer on these institutions and pure short term thinking. I'd rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

It's a good thing that university funding is provincial. Maybe they should stop cutting the funding and giving it to rich people, I'm looking at you Doug Ford.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Most collegiate institutions in Canada have been going gangbusters for 20 years building new facilities and just generally being stupid with money, cutting down on tenured professors, loading up on administrators.

Like. Maybe some very poor decisions have been made for which there are consequences.

If they were underfunded and hurting for money then why would we do this? If they're underfunded and hurting for money now then why would we provide it when they were so irresponsible with it?

There could be nuance to this situation i don't understand but from my POV our higher educational institutions need to get their fucking shit together.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

The ignorance here is incredible, and reeks of failed students, or people who drank through a 3 year BA in art history. The Canadian Foundation Institute was established 20 years ago to partner with provinces to build badly needed infrastructure for research.

Those "facilities" you are whining about are for research on disease or new technology that is the driving force of the economy. These insitutions are a great net stimulus of billions for new technology and business. New fried chicken franchises are not the future economy.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The one I have as a client has only built a new trades building and a new nursing building in the last 10 years, both for super in-demand programs. As far as I can tell they're not overly top heavy in any way.

Maybe certain institutions were being stupid, but it's definitely not all of them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

People who complain about universities have never stepped foot in one, like Doug Ford.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are lots and lots of Universities all over the world pushing out hard working, intelligent people for which there are not even close to enough jobs. Make it make sense.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, there are enough jobs, it’s just that most companies would rather pay one overworked person to pull 60hr weeks to pump out mediocre work before burning out and being replaced than pay two happy and productive people to work 40hr weeks or, heaven forbid, three people to work 30-32hr weeks with a huge bump in moral and producitivity.

We got the money, we got the people, and we got the evidence that backs it all up.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There is too much bloat. I've seen first hand essentially glorified admins being paid $130k + full pension. They need to trim the fat at these places and restructure operations to get rid of all the waste.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah that won’t happen. Senior admin bloat is like crack cocaine for universities and colleges.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  1. No public institutions in Canada pay the pensions of people employed there. The pension funds are user contributed and the mandatory contributions allow no RESP savings.

  2. Many departments between education and research have budgets exceeding $100M/yr...you want to put that in the hands of anyone making under $250K? Good luck.

Back to the National Post comment section with you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Both for this and for healthcare.

The nurses are struggling to get a fair deal while somehow the billions a year put into healthcare goes where exactly?

Not to the front line staff, I'll tell you that much.

And I get it, materials and equipment isn't cheap but between nurses salaries and material costs, and the occasional multi-million dollar piece of equipment.... I just don't see where it's all being spent. Between the middle and upper management, there needs to be an overhaul.

Education on every level isn't dissimilar.

Hell, most government services need a review, at the very least.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That'll be tough if universities see their income crater.

What do you think the $1.7B is supposed to cover?

They're trying to end low tier colleges just pumping through international students to inflate their financials, and instead trying to poach all the H1-B researchers in the US that are being scared away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Somehow I doubt their budgets shortfall and spending choices are only because government wont give these private for profit institutions enough free money.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Almost all Canadian Universities (and the ones we are really talking about here) are all non-profit. They reinvest any profits back into the institution to improve their capacity for research. This is why Canada has some of the world's leading research universities. They are not profiting to make individual people richer, they are profiting to make society and our future richer.

This is starting to change though. There are unfortunately a growing number of for-profit "universities" in the country but most of them are transparently low quality diploma-mills (which is a whole different problem that needs dealing with) and aside from misleading naive domestic and mostly international students and separating them from their money, they remain of very marginal educational or research significance. That may not continue though unless we do something to support our large majority of non-profit universities.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›