this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
181 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

10625 readers
650 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal and provincial governments have been underfunding universities for decades. Recently, universities were able to start recruiting foreign students to make up for the shortfall, but it looks like that money tap will be turned down. It doesn't look like there's a plan to make up for it.

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That'll be tough if universities see their income crater.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

As clearly this thread has no clue what goes on at universities, or even knows the difference between universities and colleges, I'll explain the OPs point.

$1.7B for 1000 scientist is $1.7M each, for 5 years in total. For senior scientists, this covers salary. But now we have 1000 extra grant applications in a system that is funded at 20% the level of the US per capita. This means we will try and recruit Americans, but tell them they will have an under 10% chance of getting any grant money, and that grant size is half a typical NIH or NSF grant. Large projects? Zero. This research has to be done somewhere, which costs universities money. The same universities getting squeezed by frozen tuitions the last 6 years.

So it is a designed bullshit line item. No one will access this because by the time it rolls out to real funds, the US will have reverted funding and going back to trouncing this banana republic. Excellence, why would an established scientists move to a poorly funded system? They will get more done of they just ride the storm in US.

This money goes to cancer and disease research, like lipid nanoparticles that saved millions of lives with COVID vaccines (yes, that came from Canada), or neural network algorithms driving trillions in investment, also from Canada, but we just pissed away that IP to the US for a handful of shiny rocks.

If Carney is serious about CDN productivity, he needs to fund R&D at per capita levels closer to US or China and make sure the result of this research is developed in Canada, not just sold off cheap to the US as per the last 60 years. A decent economist would realize there is tremendous potential return on investment, far higher than subsidies for pickup truck production to US corporations, and certainly more than the 100-150x more we waste on military spending which does nothing for the CDN economy.

This does not affect colleges. They don't do research and are for vocational training.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Are we now acting like universities are poor and aren’t gouging the fuck out of everyone?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

They're not, really. Their expenses have gone up to match. The days of just teaching with just blackboards are over.

If all expenses are necessary is another question, though. Someone mentioned administration bloat.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Right? Its more like correcting an income that was taken advantage of in the first place.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

WTF are you even talking about?

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

How much do they charge in your province? Tuition is very affordable here in Quebec

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The absolute cost of tuition doesn't speak to whether the school is "gouging," which would imply excessive profit-taking with funds moving to private investors -- WHO DON'T EVEN EXIST IN THIS SCENARIO.

No school's tuition covers the actual cost for Canadian citizens. Every tuition is highly subsidized. If anything, we're gouging the schools, because they are not allowed to raise tuitions but their costs are going up while their revenue is dropping.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Ontario is just over $6K for most programs, $9K for engineering and B.Comm coops.

US, many times that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf are you talking about. Tuitions have been frozen in Ontario for 8 years. Laurentian went broke.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Unaffordable 8 years ago doesn’t mean it’s affordable now. It’s always been a gouge and continues to be so. Higher education is for the upper middle class and wealthy, they use it to look down on others and maintain the status quo, they don’t want poor people there unless a rich person pays

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Honestly, I don't think you even know what the word "gouge" means. HINT: IT DOESN'T MEAN "EXPENSIVE"

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I watched my local college lose all its credibility as a result of running borderline scams for foreign students. My old university otoh has been rather smart about not becoming too dependent on foriegn student tuition. I love immigration, and especially think exporting our education is a good thing, but the way these programs have been run in recent years is a cancer on these institutions and pure short term thinking. I'd rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I'd rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

Actual reform would be the way to go.

UofT appears to have done a good job of keeping their books balanced, despite the glut of foreign students, but many others have not.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 hours ago

Once they come for the universities, you know whats up. Happened in nazi germany, where they burned intellectual property including but not limited to the studies of the university of berlin about gender theory.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

There is too much bloat. I've seen first hand essentially glorified admins being paid $130k + full pension. They need to trim the fat at these places and restructure operations to get rid of all the waste.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
  1. No public institutions in Canada pay the pensions of people employed there. The pension funds are user contributed and the mandatory contributions allow no RESP savings.

  2. Many departments between education and research have budgets exceeding $100M/yr...you want to put that in the hands of anyone making under $250K? Good luck.

Back to the National Post comment section with you.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago
  1. I don't want secretaries, alumni officers, event planners, making $130k, and being able to comfortably retire at 55 on a defined benefit plan, no.

  2. Plenty of MBAs in this country that manage budgets larger than that, make less than half that with no pension.

Sounds like you're the only one that reads that paper between the two of us

[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Got that right. The head of our local college was making $400,000 a year before he retired. This is a small town college not a university, and that kind of income is ridiculously high for a college president in a town of 60,000. Thats double what our premier makes.

On the other hand, I did a little digging and compared to other English speaking nation universities, Canada is actually bottom of the list for paying our university presidents: https://higheredstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Figure-6.png

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

I'm sure private universities in places like the US are included in those figures

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Both for this and for healthcare.

The nurses are struggling to get a fair deal while somehow the billions a year put into healthcare goes where exactly?

Not to the front line staff, I'll tell you that much.

And I get it, materials and equipment isn't cheap but between nurses salaries and material costs, and the occasional multi-million dollar piece of equipment.... I just don't see where it's all being spent. Between the middle and upper management, there needs to be an overhaul.

Education on every level isn't dissimilar.

Hell, most government services need a review, at the very least.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Health care money is very notoriously being withheld from hospitals, and gets redirected to private clinics at several times the cost to taxpayers. This is not the situation in education. We don't have a massive pay-to-play tier of Universities. They're all non-profit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›