this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10910 readers
155 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The group, "ICE Sighting-Chicagoland," has been increasingly used in the last five weeks of President Donald Trump’s intense deportation campaign to warn neighbors that federal agents are nearby.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] celeste@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

See the fucking problem using corporate social networks yet?

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

Corporate social media is just a mouthpiece of the far-right now.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People should use briar or signal groups for this stuff. Or host something outside of the US.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Neither of those are safe. Needs to be self hosted outside the country, as you said. Roll your own or don’t do it at all.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you not consider Signal safe?

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

While Signal is definitely one of the more secure Methods of communication, it requires a phone number to sign up. I realize that phone number may be stored somewhat securely… But it is definitely an anonymity issue. They just simply should not require this. Also, no matter what any company says, I just don’t trust them with any amount of information. So, if I was going to use an online messaging service to commit crimes, I definitely wouldn’t use something that I did not have 100% control over. But of course, do I have those skills? I think I might, but… I’m not building my own encryption for good reason.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is Briar not safe? Its self hosted and peer to peer. There is probably nothing safer and more censorship resistant that Briar.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What even is that? Is it open source? Has it been audited? Is it decentralized?

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s older than all of those. Anyone can do it, I would guess. Although, it’s range isn’t as good.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just don't.... roll your own encryption. Use a trusted standard and roll out your own self-hosted encrypted comms service.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. Agreed. It’s one thing to build a rest API for a chat client, it’s another to think you’re smart enough to outsmart a trained professional with a “quantum computer”

And if speed is not a concern you can always use a really slow encryption. Even 10 seconds for a short message can be perceived as an acceptable amount of time but in the world of encryption 10 seconds will generate a very very secure message