MAGA is just #newchristian hate
There’s a version of the bible they’ve been pushing that adds some “truth” to these nasty attitudes. And people love to shove it in your face “see!?! It’s printed here, it has to be true!!!”
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
971 points (98.1% liked)
memes
17730 readers
1878 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
it's silly because maga women are getting boob jobs and maga men are getting hair transplants
To be fair, as long as they don't crossdress, don't have gay sex and don't undergo genital surgery, they should be in the clear.
So as a trans person you're allowed to... change your name and pronouns? I think that's it, as far as the Bible goes.
I mean there is shit like Deuternonom 23, 1
“No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall enter the assembly of the Lord."
Maybe just don't give a shit about some non-sensical book some dudes in the desert made up.
Deuteronomy more like Neuteronomy
i mean it's a little outdated
but some of the lines are fire
"easier for a camel to enter the eye of a needle than a rich person to get into heaven" and "love thy neighbor" were good
maybe it's time for a rewrite
I think Leviticus has some lines about protecting immigrants, too.
maybe it's time for a rewrite
with ray tracing?
and an AI chatbot powered by Bing
And AI upscaling?
Didn’t Jesus say he was the new covenant therefore ignore all the ancient laws and follow Jesus? Jesus himself is unworthy if you follow the Old Testament
Matthew 5, 18:
For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
In short: Nope.
In practice, Christians don't think this means all old testament laws remain in force literally. That's a contradiction when they want to use literalism elsewhere, but that's not most Christians.
Of course they don't, cause that would be uncomfortable. I know, cause I used to think the same way before ridding myself of faith.
That sounds like something of a thought terminating cliche. I think it's at once simpler and more complicated.
Simpler because most Christians don't think overly much about their beliefs and believe their church's doctrine. More complicated because many do, and those that do think way beyond what's "comfortable". Scholarship going back millennia had dispelled - for scholars - any notion of biblical inerrancy, never mind literalism. For those who don't believe the Bible's plain reading is all true, there is no discomfort here - it would be a supreme arrogance to accuse minds such as Anselm, Augustine and Aquinas of merely believing whatever feels comfortable.
That doesn't mean they're right obviously, but you can do better than such dismissal.
It's not arrogance to say that if you have already found your conclusion then any counter-arguments that clearly show a contradiction and make "the christian faith is true" impossible to be a true statement will just be explained away. Either by mistranslations, missing historical or cultural context or somesuch.
Sure but it's arrogant to claim that all of these thinkers from ages past were actually doing that. I don't agree with any of them because I'm not religious but they had serious reasons for the views they held, and there were serious disagreements on matters of religion that caused serious debates with serious arguments put forward.
any counter-arguments that clearly show a contradiction and make “the christian faith is true” impossible to be a true statement
We're talking about the content of the Bible and its interpretation, not "counter-arguments that clearly show a contradiction." (And: modern religions are far to flexible to be subject to "clear contradictions". I'm sure you've heard the responses from religious people to your criticisms already - you find those response unsatisfactory, as do I, but they expose a way in which you misunderstood the fundamental character of the religion you were criticising. I can expand if necessary)
So when it comes to scripture like "I didn't come to change the law" and so on, there are any number of ways of interpreting the language non-literally in a way consistent with modern Christian practice. I'm not going to play devil's (God's?) advocate with you but dismissing such things completely and out of hand is ignorant. People with better understanding of Biblical languages than you or I have studied more of the Bible than you or I have and have had long-running arguments it. If you don't believe the fundamental principles then... just let them have it? Dispute them when they come up against obvious moral or scientific principles, or on their other statements, but claiming with zero argumentation that they don't do any real thinking is silly.
If they aren't ripping apart a pigeon and lighting it on fire on a rock after touching any wild game meat, then they're not a true Christian.
What defines "true Christian" for you? Can he put sugar on his porridge?
what's a good counter to "it says being gay is a sin in Leviticus" ?
The verse was meant to discourage religious eunichs, as so many verses were just meant to enact a change within a group of people long ago, the entire book of Deuteronomy for instance was telling Jews a specific code to live by, including sanitation and hygiene laws. Good way to encode your culture's safeguards, bad way to ensure their future peace.
Yeah sure, all the uncomfortable verses always mean something different while all the positive verses are true and valid even without context.
Meanwhile I'm here struggling to remember when exactly Christians cared about what Jesus told them to do.
Broad strokes... I know plenty of people who are Christians who attend church and hold very progressive views. I'm sorry that your experience with believers has been so poor. Please do try to remember that nobody talks about the person who isn't bothering anyone with their beliefs.
They enable the ones who do cause problems.
Helping others do harm but not physically doing it yourself does not absolve you of responsibility.
I'm in agreement.. there are so many kind, compassionate religious people who follow the good parts of the literature that I hate to see the entire religion maligned. Some people are better because of it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Jesus said nothing about people transitioning and gender, but IIRC early and medieval Christian scholars condemned bodily modifications because the body was God's creation and property and it ought to be kept intact for resurrection.
The one who can accept this should accept it.
I mean... That's a start. But what about the ones that can't seem to accept it?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Christian scholars condemned bodily modifications because they wanted to control your body instead.
Always has been.
Yeah, that's basically all of major religions. Their rationale was resurrection and the rapture.
I would like to know how, at least in some Christian variations, that you can't have tats or piercings when the text I remember covering the subject was more like, "don't burn your corpse, you're gonna need it when the time comes." If I had tats or whatever, I'd still have an intact body to be resurrected. 🤷♂️
My guess is that someone was jealous of his fellow's tats and it all snowballed from there
I agree, but they don't deserve to be called fundamentalists the way they revise the bible
All what this does is whitewash christian fundamentalist atrocities, similarly to how the "um, ackchually, the nazis were socialists" is now giving a green light to the far right of today to repeat hystorical mistakes all across the world.
load more comments
(1 replies)
There were 2 big things that cover 90% of things Jesus said in the Bible.
- love people. Full stop. Yes, them too.
- don't listen to hypocrites that make up religious rules and tell you you have to obey them.
The other 10% includes Jesus declaring that you can’t conduct trade in a temple, and beating merchants with a whip.
I ain't Christian but I will happily do the Christlike act of beating a priest with a whip.
Also something I want to note Jesus made the whip meaning that wasn't just rage that was true fury that made him dedicate a day towards crafting his instrument of retribution. Which is just metal.
When you're so furious you go home and craft for entire day, sleep, wake up and you're still mad enough to whip ass.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Remember, God doesn't make mistakes. So if God made you trans and put you here in this time where you have the options to explore that, well... seems pretty clear to me.
It's either all part of God's plan, or none of it is.
view more: next ›