this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
162 points (94.5% liked)

science

22055 readers
1702 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Research comparing Adirondack mountain lakes in New York suggests foot traffic is significant source of pollution

Hiking shoes and outdoor gear are likely a significant source of microplastic pollution in the wilderness, new research that checked for the pernicious material in several Adirondack mountain lakes in upstate New York suggests.

Researchers measured microplastic levels in two lakes that are the among highest sources of water for the Hudson River – one that sees heavy foot traffic from hikers, and another lake that is far away from a path and rarely touched by human activity.

The samples from the lake that sees heavier foot traffic showed levels that were about 23 times higher.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Plastic garbage was found in the Marianas Trench. Foot traffic brings more in, but it was gonna show up there, regardless.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

I’ve found party balloons up in the mountains

[–] suff@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago

Goretex is Teflon! Teflon never degrades, causes cancer!

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This study only proves that human activity sheds microplastics. How are they making the claim that the source of the plastics is from hiking gear? It could be food wrappers, microplastic in our excrement, really any other human activity.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They've gotta have some way to make it about shaming the individual...

You know, to take the heat off all the corporations spewing metric fucktonnes of plastic into the air, water, and various substrates across the fucking planet every goddamned day... Right? 🤌🏼

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 0 points 5 hours ago

So what you're saying is "kill all humans"? I can get behind that message.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 48 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Microplastics are also in the rain. So I’m not sure we should be worried about hiking gear at this point.

Single use plastics for non-medical uses should be taxed out of existence.

https://www.sciencealert.com/plastic-rain-is-a-now-a-thing-and-weve-underestimated-just-how-heavy-it-is

[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Was your purpose to spread disillusionment?

Because that probably was the consequence.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Don’t be disillusioned. Most of the microplastics in the air is thought to come from tire dust. It’s a problem a lot of tire companies are already working on. And because EVs mostly use regenerative braking, they’ll make an impact there as well.

https://ev.com/news/study-reveals-evs-produce-less-brake-and-tire-pollution-with-fewer-non-exhaust-emissions

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 65 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It falls to the earth in rain and snow. That’s probably a more insurmountable threat than backpacks.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 25 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I was gonna say... isn't this just in the air and rain now?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah its more of the same "carbon footprint" (pun intended) rhetoric pushed by the biggest polluters of the planet.
"Look Look the plebs are the evil ones, not us the poor innocent billionaire corpos"
Meanwhile every day the rain probably drops a billion times more than all hiking boots combined.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

PNW hikers: "Was that not an option already?"

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I was on a hike years ago very early in the morning, only one other car at the trail head. On the way up, spotted the only other dude hiking naked except for shoes and a backpack.

I'm not bothered by the naked as much as the idea of getting mosquito bites on my balls. Fuck that noise.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

If you keep moving the mosquitoes won't catch you, unless you're somewhere insane like Siberia. Dude like that probably has his balls covered in OFF!.

Also, funny trick I keep trying, and it works. Hold your breath and walk quickly. They no longer have a lock on your CO2 and will drop back. My lungs are jacked from smoking in my youth, can't go too far.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Naked I could do, but hiking without shoes sounds terrible

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 3 points 18 hours ago

Leather moccasons it is then.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 19 hours ago

Macro plastics are also brought into the wilderness on hiking shoes and gear.

[–] teft@piefed.social 8 points 19 hours ago

Makes sense. Lots of rain gear and tents use teflon in their waterproof coatings. That shit sheds worse than a malamute in spring.