this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
565 points (98.6% liked)

Funny

11919 readers
2727 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There's two major sources of confusion in IT:

  • caching
  • giving variables names
  • off-by-one errors
[–] BurnoutDV@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

There js also the variant

  1. Asynch...
  2. Variable Names
  3. Off by one errors...ronity
[–] ratel@mander.xyz 5 points 3 hours ago

That reminds me of: Two threads a bar walk into.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

And those who can extrapolate from complete data, got it.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 3 hours ago

!shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

There are two types of people in the world:

  1. Those who divide the world into two types of people
  2. Those who do not divide the world into two types of people
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 37 minutes ago

There are two types of absolutists in the world.

  1. Only the Sith deal in absolutes

reminds me of this classic:

there's essentially only two types of worldviews in the world: dualistic and non-dualistic worldviews

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There are three types of people in the world:

  1. Those who can count
  2. Those who cant
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 48 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

They're just playing it safe. Extrapolating from a small dataset is irresponsible

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"... and horses. Yes, horse people. You thought you could extrapolate from a single data point? Don't be ridiculous."

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You would hope, but far too many people fail to even understand the shape of the hole in their knowledge, so they wouldn't even recognize what should go in that blank spot...

Then you get billions of people believing there's a magical sky daddy that will take care of us no matter what, and those words about us being good stewards of the earth is totally just about like, not pooping on the road! Definitely not about wanton resource extraction and environmental exploitation and distruction...

All those lessons about how to be a good ruler are just describing that sky daddy! They're definitely not direct and allegorical stories trying to teach what virtues to look for in leaders and which ones deserve to be dethroned... God is definitely real literally and not just allegory for leaders that are glorified, it's definitely not about humans treating other humans with respect, but about Sky Daddy playing with his toys!

[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

c/shirtsthatgohard

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 75 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

There's 10 types of people, those who understood binary ...

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Those that understood ternary...

Those that understood quarternary...

.......

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We count 1 to 10 like everyone else!

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Every base is base 10 in its own base.

Really makes you thinks.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Wait a second but you just used null to represent people who don't understand binary... So that leaves 1 to represent something else TELL ME THE OTHER KIND OF PERSON!!!!

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

roger roger

Those that understand cinary Those that understand dinary Those that understand einary Those that understand finary Those that understand ginary Those that understand hinary Those that understand iinary Those that understand jinary Those that understand kinary

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Two types of people. Those who have lost data, those who will.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago

The ones who think they can, and get it wrong, helped put Trump in office.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 hours ago

Bonus: it's a statistics class.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm expecting people to extrapolate from incomplete date is how you end up with responses like "I don't care who the second group is, their mysterious ways must be wiped from the earth."

/s

[–] III@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Not sure why you added the /s when this line of thinking is quickly becoming the primary line of thinking.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 7 points 8 hours ago

Damn, is your professor Thor?

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 12 points 9 hours ago

"Congratulations! You're both very special."

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

...and they thought they were being clever

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So one asked the question, and then someone else asked the same question?

[–] illi@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's more common than you'd think

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Then that means there's 3 types of people