this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
80 points (81.2% liked)

Firefox

21018 readers
318 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox app on android. Never seen this before until today. But Firefox is now putting ads in the app?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 77 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

settings > homepage > shortcuts > uncheck 'sponsored shortcuts'

[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I think people need to appreciate that Mozilla is probably the only company in the world that will allow you to turn off ads like this, for free.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I turn everything off in Firefox’s new page except search! I always found the news stuff distracting too.

that's typically what i do but on desktop i turn off search too since a) i use the awesomebar primarily and b) my ntp is a background and i'd rather see that for a cleaner look :)

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

You should be able to turn off "web search" too if you go to the page mentioned in the parent comment.

(Note the Edit icon in the corner of the homepage does not give you all the options. It used to let you turn off sponsored content, but Mozilla removed that a couple versions ago.)

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Thankies....you solved a problem I didn't know I had

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

So, every real alternative to Firefox, is most likely based on all the work that Mozilla has done on Firefox. People get it for free, and yet they crumple and whine, when Mozilla tries to get the money to keep steady development going.

I want it free, I want them to do all the work, and then I'm going to use another browser, based on their work, because I don't like that great development cost money - and I won't pay! Buhuu!

Get over yourself. Mozilla does great work for users worldwide. Don't like to see ads? Then start donating! Grow TF up, and realize that nothing is free in a capitalistic world!

[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Donating to Mozilla doesn't change any behavior in Firefox.

Also, donations to Mozilla don't go towards Firefox development. As far as I'm aware the only way to "give" money to Mozilla Corp (who work on Firefox, as opposed to the Mozilla Foundation) is to subscribe to the VPN service they resell.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

It might... But I guess it's easier to just badmouth Firefox.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would pay for Firefox. The same way I donate every year to Thunderbird!

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

But do you?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I prefer to view this as a socialist. Firefox is the work of tens of thousands of laborers, and is not owned by an out of touch upper class. Yet, they are mismanaging it.

It took me time to realize that I, a highly trained engineer, was a laborer and have similar issues to most people the last few centuries.

It is literally needed that the workers of Firefox rise up and revolt before the entire project is harmed beyond repair

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

That might be... Then you should work for that.

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

While I get the sentiment, I think you are missing the two pieces here. One is that advertising is not the only method of monetization which can support something like Firefox. The second is that advertising is by it's nature influence. Both in influence over the purchaser and reader. It's an influence we should not approve of in both cases, without better boundaries.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh, do enlighten me. How should they get som money otherwise?

I think Mozilla loathe ads as much as you and I... But do enlighten os, how can they earn enough money otherwise?

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (4 children)

My question is: can it be turned off?

Mozilla has been trying to get me to look at news or use Pocket for years now, but it’s easy to turn off.

Edit to add: my above reference to turn off two different settings I’ve turned off for years now seemed obvious to me that I assumed it could be turned off.

Lot of people didn’t read past the first sentence.

Oooh this is lemmy.ml. Fuck gross bye

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Goodbye, have a good day.

[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Settings>Homepage>Sponsored shortcuts

I turned it off a long time ago, I don't think this is new.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes. I'm pretty sure you can disable sponsored suggestions in the options, or you can also just delete the individual sponsored options. I've not seen one of these in the last 4 years.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Mozilla Firefox have never forced you to do anything in regards of ads. They fight for your right, for your freedom. Do you know there's a help file in the browser? It's a lot easier to use, than to write in here about mundane problems.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

It was more of a rhetorical because of the second sentence, but it’s clear you didn’t read that far.

Is lemmy.ml chock full of dumbshits?

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 1 points 52 seconds ago

Why ask a question you have the answer. So weird

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 25 minutes ago

Well, you are here...

[–] markz@suppo.fi 106 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

I think those have been there since forever?

[–] Tug@kbin.earth 16 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

This should be towards the top. I've been on FF4A for years now and they've had those links there the whole time. You can toggle them off if yku don't want them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 69 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As has always been the case, you can turn off Sponsored Shortcuts and Sponsored Stories.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... Never knew that setting existed because this is the first time I'm even seeing a sponsor.

If it was something besides some big Corpo I'd probably not have minded...

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

Mozilla's #1 sponsor is Google, which is why you'll see two Google logos on a fresh install of FF (after you click through their initial setup screens)

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I didn't mind the occasional sponsor or two for many years. Then one day they went over the line.

Yeah I know i should be on librefox/waterfox. Im lazy okay?

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

You can disable them, but also I'm pretty sure the default behavior is just to fill extra space if you have less than 8 pinned shortcuts. Your single shortcut is why there are so many ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

This isn't new afaik. You can disable it in settings

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Making a browser is expensive (especially with such incompetent management), they need to make money somehow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›