this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
382 points (99.7% liked)

News

32724 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago

Known bug.

Out of scope. Won't be fixed.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do we have a tally somewhere of people killed by Teslas? I bet they racked up quite the high score up until now.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's some disagreement about how Tesla's safety compares to other brands though, with one study giving it the highest fatal accident rate and others giving Tesla a good safety score.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/01/11/tesla-fatality-rates/

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

The number of fatal crashes and the safety score are not the same measures.

Insurance actuaries know the correct answer and Teslas are among the most expensive vehicles to insure, along with Dodge Ram pickups for obvious reasons.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Teslas turning off the autopilot feature less than a second before a crash, also helps keep that safety score high for the company. Its obviously driver error they couldn't avoid an accident in < 1 second. https://futurism.com/tesla-nhtsa-autopilot-report

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I was gonna say that given that there's about 40k traffic deaths per year in the US, 700 deaths from Tesla seems low. But I looked up deaths over distance and Tesla is in fact in the lead with 5.6 deaths per billion miles. Kia and Buick coming up behind them with 5.5 and 4.8 respectively.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Should we really be counting the ones where someone else rear ends a tesla and dies? That's like saying the stairs killed someone who tripped over their own feet and fell down them.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the car is disproportionately unsafe to crash into, yes.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a point. I feel like crashing into a cybertruck would be like just hitting a steel wall. No crumpling or anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 30 points 1 week ago

Who cares, FSD is so safe that doors opening in emergencies isn’t really necessary.

I’m joking of course, fuck.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"You're crashing it wrong"

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They didn't put it in crash mode before the collision. 100% the owners responsibility.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wcgw when there's no physical override?

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

There’s an app for that.

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Engineers stopped doing things simply because analysts determined that businesses can make more money by selling products with complicated and unnecessary garbage.

Of course, no sympathy for people who get screwed over for buying a car that costs more than my house.

Another person who saw wealth as something to be used for status, not to help those who have less. Rest in piss.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don’t know why anyone would ever buy a Tesla

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most modern cars automatically lock doors when you reach certain speed (like 20km/h). I checked and automatically unlocking door on impact is a separate feature that may or may not be present in a car. So I think you won't be able to open most modern cars from the outside after a crash. The only difference is that you will open other cars from the inside without issues while in Tesla you have to use other door handle in front seats and it's really complicated to open them from the back seats. Is that right?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

which is so stupid, who would break in your car at 20kmh?

I always thought the opposite would make much more sense, locking doors when you're below 10kmh and unlocking once driving

Firefighters always struggle more to open locked doors (duh) as much as I hate those, I don't think it's something specific to it.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's to prevent you from accidentally opening the door.

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s more to keep you from being carjacked than for accidental door openings.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yes protect me from being carjacked at speed

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

That's all bullshit of course. Cars lock the doors when going above a certain speed for the first time and the airbag control module always sends a crash signal across the various can buses during an airbag deployment event that is used by various other control units for example to unlock the doors or kill the gas pump. My twenty year old Audi had that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I guess they don't lock/unlock constantly because that would be annoying in stop and go traffic.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also probably really bad for solenoids and locking mechanisms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I played Cyberpunk 2077 and Hitman: World of Assassinations. In Cyberpunk 2077 one hack in the game is to literally make the car explode (you need to be a high level Netrunner for that) and other hacks involve making the car accelerate unstoppably or engage emergency brakes (rendering it immobile). I've seen Teslas not only burn like hell with the doors somehow having an autolock feature always engaging at that time. It just makes me wonder how long it will be before one such Tesla fire is found to be a deliberate action by another to commit murder?

I am surprised that it hasn't happened yet.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it hasn't happened because the cars can do it on their own just fine

Good morning 47, your target is WhatsHisAss, he drives a tesla and... oh, never mind. It set itself on fire, return to the safe house. You'll receive the money for all expenses since you didn't technically kill the guy...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I think Musk has openly stated that he wants to be Arasaka

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Remember Musk has access to all the car switches, pedals, steering, etc. if it happens often enough, it won't be odd when it's convenient for him that someone is burned alive in one of his mobile ovens.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

one of his mobile ovens.

The real dream of all true Nazis.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well thankfully only those buying cyber trucks are maga… so darwin’s law I guess

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or stupid tech bros/MBAs with a lot of money in their pockets and not much in their brains for common decency. At least this explains the rare cyber truck I've spotted here in Mexico.

They're fucking everywhere in Denver for some reason. I see at least one a day.

[–] MrIamsosmrt@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

The article is from march and the accident happened in November 2024.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's pretty normal in a car crash, no? The frame crumples and the doors often get stuck.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Except in these, there are no fucking handles. So, even if you tried. Nope. No power no open. And with the hardened glass that would normally allow a rescuer to just shatter a window... Nope.

Enjoy dying in a fire.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, facts would be useful here, rather than speculation

  • maybe the frame was deformed so the door couldn’t open
  • maybe the door was locked
  • maybe the button or solenoid was broken or unpowered

Maybe the lack of mechanical latch is to blame but we don’t know that yet

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Cars unlock the doors during a crash and this has been the standard for quite some time.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

It's called a fail safe the clue is in the name. The failure mode of a mechanism is it's safe mode.

In cars with mechanical locks they require power to be in the locked position in the unlocked position a solenoid loses power and a mechanical spring pulls it into the unlocked position. So when it fails and loses power the default is to unlock. Sure the mechanism could become damaged and bent out of shape but we're talking about a sliding bolt here, something that can be manipulated with a mechanical lever like a key.

load more comments
view more: next ›