this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
117 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14115 readers
777 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

from leftistgamermemes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 46 points 5 days ago (8 children)

I would appreciate people not conflating socialism with welfare, especially since the government is notorious for abandoning vets anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] axont@hexbear.net 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i really don't like using the word socialism to mean something like sharing or welfare

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 days ago

Unironically, it is a part of it. It’s capable of showing what a worker-controlled governance could do for it’s people if it was a socialist model. There is a scientific definition of socialism and one that could be used to refer to a welfare/public service part of governance. For the sake of brevity and for reaching a wider audience, this is how the meme was created.

It’s not my OC.

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Socialism is when the government does stuff

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the message is the fact that the government is willing to provide fully tax-payer funded benefits of healthcare, education, etc to it's "workers" and their children based off of their service in exploitation for the imperial core.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hexbears enjoy a basic meme challenge

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

only-throw no enjoy! only critique!

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago

i know it's not a leftist meme because there's only one paragraph

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think muddying the definition of socialism to a population that already has a notoriously poor grasp on it is a bad thing.

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

muddying the definition of socialism

Nobody is muddying anything. Unironically, it is a part of it. It’s capable of showing what a worker-controlled governance could do for it’s people if it was a socialist model. There is a scientific definition of socialism and one that could be used to refer to a welfare/public service part of governance.

I’m well aware of both.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It's an extremely unhelpful framing. Just say "welfare" if you want to say "welfare." Don't stoop to asinine definitions that result in saying that the US is "partially socialist" and in fact even Ancient Rome is "partially socialist."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fox@hexbear.net 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Socialism is when you blow your leg off killing brown children and then the government claims it's a pre-existing condition but they'll offer a low interest loan to study film so you can express how sad you were killing the brown children

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think the message is the fact that the government is willing to provide fully tax-payer funded benefits of healthcare, education, etc to it's "workers" and their children based off of their service in exploitation for the imperial core. Extends beyond soldiers too.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

when you know what socialism is

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago

when you know what a meme is

[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

@people who are bothered by the framing here, i think we all are, but its also important to recognize your average person doesnt know what socialism is and in that framing this in great critique and an easy way to point out a problem. is it based on a false definition? sure. the premise is correct tho and thats what most people seeing this are understanding and what’s important. those people can learn what socialism is after they learn what the US military actually is.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (12 children)

It's an easy way to point out a problem, but it's also an easy way to feed anti-socialist brainworms.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago (5 children)

giving more people a wrong definition of socialism is definitely not helpful

[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

they already have the wrong definition of socialism. they just learned a new perspective about capitalism tho. you didn't always know the correct definition of socialism. seeing a meme on the internet doesn't grant an eternal curse on you that disallows you from ever learning what the correct definition of socialism is

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

But why would you take your extremely limited audience with a passing viewer as a chance to reinforce a nonsense definition when it's genuinely one of the core difficulties socialism faces that people are systematically misinformed on its basic nature? Why assume that they'll have the inclination to unlearn this false definition that we are contributing to for the sake of this useless "anti-capitalist" gesture? Have we not seen the ideological capture of places like antiwork that failed to have any sort of positive alternative and end up just becoming, to be generous, socdem liberalism?

The very first thing that a socialist should do is try to explain, even in the most glancing terms, what socialism is, and that will on average get more interest and more productive engagement than another "capitalism bad :P" post to go on the pile of decades of liberals nebulously complaining about capitalism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the original framing and context is that soldiers are offered the benefits that would be offered to all the workers under a socialist governance but instead are offered those "socialist" benefits in exchange for service to enforcing the will of capital.

That isn't wrong, it isn't "incorrect" to say that it is "socialism" even if it isn't scientifically accurate to the word or our niche/specific political definitions. This would matter more on say, my home-instance Lemmygrad then a left-unity board especially when a lot of newer folks are on here. Words can have multiple meanings and those inflections can shift based on the context they're being used. More importantly, I think people hand-wringing and griping about it have more of an issue with puritanism with a bit of a lack of comprehension of context speaking that it's quite easy to just click on a user's profile and take a bit of a deeper dive. In fairness, I've done it myself with being too hasty. Some things I learned while here, I suppose.

In another meme made by the same creator, it's clear what they meant. Not "socialism is when government does stuff" but clearly capitalists and the ones they choose from political will enjoy the benefits we all would under socialist economy. Pretty clear.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I think the message is the fact that the government is willing to provide fully tax-payer funded benefits of healthcare, education, etc to it's "workers" and their children based off of their service in exploitation for the imperial core.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 5 days ago

That's becoming seriously curtailed for a long time and it's continuing.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Where did you come to that conclusion?

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

it was revealed to me in a dream

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The socialism: excellent rates on Ford F-150 ownership and a home out in the middle of bumfuck nowhere where you'll raise kids to be just as soulless as you (if you didn't crush them with the F-150 that is) spamton

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think the message is the fact that the government is willing to provide fully tax-payer funded benefits of healthcare, education, etc to it's "workers" and their children based off of their service in exploitation for the imperial core.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago
[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think this is a good meme because

  1. Government do (welfare/investment) stuff is literally a part of socialism

  2. It can be understood by the masses

  3. It does not portray America's imperial adventures in a good light, and correctly blames "enforcing capitalism" rather than idealist factors.

OP, good job.

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 days ago

It isn't even mine! Lmao, people are acting like I haven't been on here for two years.

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

based on recent suggestions:

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Socialism is when benefits flow to a select few.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

socialism is when you know the thing

but I think what we should really be focusing on is that flag looks more like the UK than the US

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Eh, they're both bloody butcher's aprons.

[–] Tormato@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

I like Lewis Black’s definition of socialism:

“It’s like enforced Christianity.”

load more comments
view more: next ›