this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
102 points (80.4% liked)

You Should Know

41540 readers
8 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

my phone has been running at 60hz for YEARS and I just now learned that I just had to enable a setting. Why wasn't this enabled by default???

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

IMHO the only reason to go above 60Hz is for better responsiveness in competitive games. Otherwise it's just a meme, definitely a total gimmick on smartphones.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 71 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Depends on your device and a bunch of other factors. If you are trying to maximize battery life you are generally better sticking to 60.

If you are consuming 120fps content or doing some kind of mobile gaming that actually supports it, you may benefit from 120.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Basic scrolling feels so much better. And I don't think it really makes a huge difference for battery life, so I always leave if at 120.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

If you're not used to 120 Hz then with 60 Hz you don't feel like you're missing out

[–] obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't daily driven a phone but I really like the idea of the screens that can go below 60hz. Such as if you are reading a static webpage or an ebook.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I messed around with the "display refresh rate" setting and it seems like it's 120 when there's any sort of animation or you touch the screen at all, but it goes to 60 if it's just playing a video or you're not touching it, and 30 for the "always on" display that shows the clock.

I expected it to be more like the SteamDeck which just goes 1fps if nothing is happening on the home menu and jumps up to 60 or 90 (depending on model and settings) when anything moves. 30fps for a clock seems wasteful, but then again I'm not a phone expert so 🤷‍♀️

pretty interesting!

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I have to give credit to Apple for the variable motion, ranging from 1 fps to 120 fps. Sadly, the 1fps is only ever used on the lock screen. So much wasted potential.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're talking about different things. SteamDeck doesn't set your display refresh frequency to 1hz. It's just rendering frames at 1fps.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe you will like e-ink phones

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Or if competitive gaming has ruined you, why not let it ruin you battery life too?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re better off with 120hz if you like reading things on your phone at all.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How does higher frequency help with reading static text?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When reading on a smaller screen there is more scrolling, and on a phone with a lower frequency screen there’s significantly more blur to the text as you scroll.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I don't scroll while reading or read while I scroll. Also, my mind just cancels the scrolling, and I'm not even aware of it.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I read on my phone a lot and I’m a pretty fast reader so having to stop reading every time I have to scroll down a bit and find my place again is really irritating after anything more than a couple paragraphs.

With a higher frequency screen you can slow scroll as you read which is still faster than you can read so when reading content that isn’t heavily paginated you can just keep reading indefinitely without having to pause almost at all and it’s just a much nicer and fluid experience.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Well, to each their own. I'm also a fast reader, but it doesn't bother me at all. I just give a quick scroll with my thumb from the bottom of the screen all the way up, in an instant, read everything and repeat, like paginated content. My mind ignores everything that happens between each new text to read. I care more for the content I read than about the device I use.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

why would I want my phone to lose battery faster?

[–] Stez827@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's wayyyyy smoother and just makes everything feel much faster And it doesn't have a huge impact on battery life

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Personally I saw a very noticeable improvement in battery life after turning it off.

[–] Stez827@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's different phone to phone personally I've never had a phone where it massively impacts it to the point where it actually makes a difference. I'm plugging in before I go to sleep anywyas

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

A bunch of manufacturers implement adaptive refresh rates. So your battery shouldn't drain noticeably faster unless you are scrolling, but that's where you'd want extra frames the most.

More frames, more smooth and it at least feels like I'm a bit quicker with navigation. It's just nice.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because using a phone with a 60hz refresh rate is disgusting

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've never been over 60hz on a phone and my current "blissfully unaware of what I'm missing" state disagrees. Battery life over all. I think it still sucks we get Uber a days with of battery by default in phones still. I miss only having to charge like once a week.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't even think about my phone for days at a time. Charge it about once a week.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

The only time I've gone longer than two days was when I wasn't seeing anybody and my good friends were out of town.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

The first thing I always do is turn 120Hz off. The difference just isn't meaningful enough to justify the extra battery drain. On a PC monitor sure, but on a phone I really don't care if my feed scrolls a bit smoother.

[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the reminder. I was wondering why my phone was using extra battery for the last month. Looks like a recent software update toggled 120hz on. I did have it turned off. I just went in and turned it back off.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

The recent Android update also re-enabled using my thumb print to unlock the phone, even though I'd had that disabled for at least a year.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

Rip battery

[–] Saltarello@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

For me its not worth the hit on battery. Mind you my phone screen is 3088x1440 WQHD+ capable yet I set that to 720p. Sure, the image is a tiny bit better at higher res but for me I'd rather have a stronger battery life than a marginally better looking image on such a relatively small screen.

[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Curious, on which phones is it called "Smooth Display"?

On my Sony Xperia 1 VI running Android 15, this option is called "High Refresh Rate" like a sane person would call it lol

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Stock Android. Like Pixel/Lenovo

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In terms of running faster, saving power and preserving battery life, that reminds me that I turned off some stuff on my phone a couple years ago, and have been completely happy with the result.

Looking it up, I thiiink it went like this:

To disable animations on most Android phones, go to Settings > Accessibility > Color and motion (or Visibility enhancements) and enable the Remove animations option.

For more granular control, enable Developer options by tapping the Build Number in "About phone" five times, then find and adjust the "Window animation scale," "Transition animation scale," and "Animator duration scale" settings to their lowest values or off.

Before trying any of that, please do fact-check the above.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometimes turning off the animations can cause other issues with some apps and scrolling. I usually just split the difference and use 0.5 scale and speed. Things are snappier while not causing graphical issues.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Good to know! I haven't noticed any issues over here, but I would expect that with certain apps on certain phones, it could indeed muck things up...

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's nice that it's optional (as opposed to someone else making decisions for you). Some people will appreciate the extra display smoothness while others will be fine with 60 Hz and the extra battery life.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't want over 60fps anywhere, ever, at any time. Rendering 120 or 144 frames per second is over twice as much to process, with no noticeable improvement.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you can't tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps, you need to see a doctor.

Now, not seeing the difference between 120fps and 144fps is understandable, and between 120fps and 240fps I can also understand. But having seen 60fps and 120fps side-by-side, there is just as much difference as between 30fps and 60fps.

I switched to 120Hz displays where possible years ago and haven't really wanted to go back. Except for the two CRT TVs I have, but I have those because they are CRTs, not because of their refresh rate.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunate you can't notice the buttery smoothness if 60+ fps.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think this post made more people turn that setting off on their phones than the other way around xD

[–] lemmus@szmer.info 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah for some reason it runs on adaptive mode. For example longer battery life. Just turn on refresh counter and see how it works for better understanding, its all optimisation.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No. Battery is already too small.

[–] tal@olio.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

I turn the refresh rate down on phones, where battery matters. I turn it up on desktops, where it doesn't matter.

load more comments
view more: next ›