this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
431 points (99.8% liked)

pics

24769 readers
796 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Its a good change, but these pictures man......having HDR and saturation dialled to 100 in the lower picture is unnecessary.

[–] thomas@feddit.uk 20 points 3 days ago

I think the first pic is from good street view. The second could well be default settings on whatever the camera model was.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are no HDR haloes and the saturation is only high in the greens. I think you're just comparing two pictures, one of which has bright green in and feeling weird about it.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sky is roughly the same value, buildings are way brighter in the bottom image.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The top image is a sunny day; the bottom is cloudy. (Look at the shadows). The exposure in the bottom image is much brighter - you can also see this from the appearance of the building on the left - dark in the top image, light in the bottom image.

This has nothing to do with pushing saturation; it's just a different (better) exposed photo. People throw terms like saturation and HDR around willy nilly.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Potential a different time of day too

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough! I just saw the differences and commented without thinking.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oversaturated greenery with grey concrete makes it kinda post apocalyptic. I.e. typical London.

[–] thomas@feddit.uk 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wandered down there just the other week, probably hadn’t been there since Covid and man, if there was ever a living, breathing reason to pedestrianise central London much as possible, this is it. It is really serene, relaxing and a pleasant spot to be.

It used to be one of those places you’d only walk past if you **had to **.

Superb stuff!

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago

did you πŸ’₯ have a 🎡banana🎡?

Thank you, fucking thank you!

[–] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] thomas@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Bottom image is 2025