this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3319 readers
855 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It notes that opponents of the bill say it's disrespectful or goes against religious beliefs. The latter might very well be true, but doesn't a person have to choose to have this done to their body after death? Wouldn't someone who finds the concept offensive... just not choose it?

[–] Ascrod@midwest.social 23 points 2 days ago

It's like trying to tell some people that if they don't like abortions or gay marriage, don't have one. Logical to you, immoral and abhorant to them.

There a certain percentage of people everywhere that just want smear themselves all over you life

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 2 days ago

There’s republicans getting in the way of freedom once again.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Watch republicans cry about this.

[–] ValarieLenin@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago

Sky Burials when?!?! This is cool though

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm ok with this. I'm also really hoping to have a green burial, if my physical condition wouldn't endanger the environment (that is nothing that would contaminate the earth, groundwater table, or humans handling disposal. I doubt my few silver amalgam fillings would release as many contaminates as cremation). I'd be interested in knowing what beliefs argue against it and why, simply for my own understanding.

Your silver amalgam fillings are 50% mercury and must be removed and disposed of properly prior to burial or cremation. I'm not sure about the method mentioned in the article exactly, but it's illegal for dentists to dispose of amalgam in the trash because it contaminates the leachate of the landfill, so I think you'd have to get them removed prior to this too.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Not explicitly an argument against it, but I wonder if the plastic in humans at this point could be considered environmentally harmful. I suppose that if it's everywhere already, the decomposition of a body would add an insignificant amount more.

Good job, fuckhead Murphy. I hope you're as restless as I am because NJTransit's still fucked. But at least my body can be thrown in a landfill. Great job.