this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
851 points (90.3% liked)

memes

17384 readers
1809 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screenshot)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a parent of one child who is the opposite of feral and never gets hit.

And while yes obviously we should not teach our children that physical abuse is how we keep people in line, this conversation needs to go far beyond the level if disciplinary tactics. What's the whole overall parenting strategy?

I submit that actually having a strategy leads to less abuse, and that those who are the quickest to abuse are also the ones who do not take the time to reflect on themselves, their parenting, life, etc. At least not in a way that could potentially make them feel bad or change their ways.

And I'm not even trying to position myself as a perfect parent above physical intervention. Especially when safety is involved. But you have to leave room for escalation. If everything is met with the same reaction of losing your shit, then no bad behaviors seem any worse than others.

I don't know if modern people are truly any worse at parenting than past generations, or if it's yet another example of humanity's shittiness being exposed by our explosion in communications technology.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't. Crime is down. Underage drinking and drug use is down. Less underage pregnancy. More people are completing secondary. Anyone who says kids are worse hasn't looked at the numbers.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's typically how it works. People default to complaining and seeing everything as getting worse all the time.

I wonder if the "feral child" phenomenon has actually increased though (I don't think there would be stats) and if that has something to do with the lower crime rate.

Not that it's good to let your child be a feral nuisance. But if a child has shitty parents maybe that's better for their development than whatever abuse the parents would choose to control it.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Yoooo, I have two kids who I have never laid a hand on, and they behave extremely well compared to their peers (not perfect by any means, but I am very happy with them). My father beat the shit out of me when I was a kid, and what did that get him? Me hating him until now. I still help him and take care of him, but to be 100% honest, I don't have love for the man. You don't need to beat a little being who has no defense to make them behave, this is just absurd and stupid.

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 5 points 8 hours ago

How about we just say no to the idea of beating kids

If your kid comes home from school saying another kid beat them up ofc you'd be horrified yet some parents are okay with hitting their own kids and it makes no sense

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

"Those pesky kids need a beating" is a meme several thousands years old

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 12 points 20 hours ago

Yeah but then I see grown ass adults doing the same shit. And since they're my age they more than likely got beat.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

The answer isn't to beat your kids though. I just think the current generation is taking the good advice to not hit your kids and is too impatient (or doesn't have enough time) to actually raise kids that aren't screaming all the damn time.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

The whole “don’t say ‘no’ to your child“ …we’re gonna have a whole generation who won’t understand what nonconsent is. In a literal way too.

I do not understand these people who think boundaries break others. It’s massively flawed and problematic to train humans like this. It’s sabotaging their kids into being abusers and thinking they are above being kind.

We all have choices to be assholes. To be an asshole is a choice. Don’t make it their only option.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I can't understand how such an obviously stupid approach to rasing kids even got off the ground to the point of general awareness. Any intelligent adult should be able to see how learning to take a "no" is an essential part of growing up. Same with dealing with negative emotions in general, which I understand the whole "never say no" thing is trying to avoid.

My daughter was taught how to take a no at a young age. It was a bit rough the first few times, but she quickly learned to take them in stride.

[–] suzucappo@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

I have come to understand that the whole "don't say no" thing is less about directly saying no and leaving it at that and more about taking the time to explain things to your child.

When it comes to new situations for things that I haven't yet encountered I don't just say no. I sit down with them and explain to them why.

Yes there are times when I will just say no, like when they know what the answer is going to be and understand why but are just doing it to do it, or if there isn't time in that specific moment to explain I would preface it with that and then explain it later.

I think people misinterpret the whole don't say no thing sometimes and literally just give their kids whatever they want which is obviously not good. Boundaries are not optional, and like you mention it is a flawed way of thinking and will absolutely lead to problems down the road.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Try telling your kids not to scream.

... and watch them screaming even more just to annoy you.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

/woosh

Kids don't "scream JUST to annoy you". If you think that you might be the parent people are complaining about.

Kids are gonna be kids sometimes mate. But they are people not. They aren't doing something "just to annoy you". They have reasons they act the way they do. And it's always because of who raised them.

My point was about actually being a parent and being able to raise a child with mutual respect. It's obviously not just "stop screaming".

The biggest thing is teaching your child that screaming does not get them positive results. Lots of parents have a really hard time transitioning from raising an infant, to raising a toddler, to raising a kid.

By the time they are a teenager they are still whining like an infant to get what they want.

I heard a kid screaming in public a couple weeks ago. I swear to God it sounded like a toddler having a tantrum. I look over and it's literally a kid at least 10 years old. It blew my mind. The parents where treating him like an infant trying to find out what he wanted.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, part of it is to teach that they won't get their way by annoying you into giving in. Helps in my case that I can be a stubborn fuck, too. It means I have to choose my battles because I don't want to back myself into a situation where I make a choice, realize it's not the best one, but feel like I have to stand my ground to combat whining. Luckily we're past the point of tantrums and she's old enough that I can explain my reasoning in cases where I say one thing at first but then later change my mind.

But there's two other parts imo. One is teaching them the right way to express what they want (as well as when stating what they want might be rude or out of line, like if it's in response to getting a gift that isn't their top choice). And the other is being open and honest about the why. I only use "because I said so" or some equivalent to deal with the endless chain of "why?"s (though I've found deflecting it back at her is also effective, like "why do you think it is?").

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I agree much of this comes down to parenting. I'm right with you on the passive parenting. It's introducing unnecessary problems upon the child and society.

That said random kids we see could also have learning disabilities that aren't apparent at first.

My nephew is on autistic spectrum and does tantrums at 12 all because plans change (part of life but he's still struggling with that despite consistency). He doesn't appear at first as any different from any teenager until he's triggered. It's not appropriate. We always remind him to speak respectfully. He has a younger sister who is way more adjusted by comparison (has normal tween struggles) but she's not as neurodivergent. Basic parenting advice on behavior is working for her.

Though it can be a struggle to talk a child out of this when it's beyond just understanding. Learning to cope is just taking longer for this teen. Possibly aging into medication and long term therapy. It took that for my other niece on a different spectrum who's still finding the right medication and adjusting.

Just something to consider when judging random ppl.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow, I was actually agreeing with you here. Telling your kids to not scream does not work.

So yes, woosh apparently.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Well given the equal up and down votes on your comment I think your reply can clearly be interpreted as disagreement. Also, saying kids "scream just to annoy you" is ignorant.

Don't make an unclear ignorant comment and expect people to take it in good faith.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you make adversarial choices, your kids will definitely scream to annoy you. You took it as me saying that kids "only" scream to annoy, which is obviously not true.

So yes, I was on the internet assuming that people argue in good faith and try to have a good time .... I mean yeah, I guess I should have seen that one coming.

I think I'm not cut out for this.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Your comment used the word "just" which in that sentence literally means "only". You could have cleared up the misunderstanding. But your short comment was ignorant sounding. It's why it got down voted mate.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's so fucking insane to me that the majority of Americans think beating your kids is acceptable and even healthy

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Then You haven't met Australians

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Damn, I would think corporal punishment would be illegal in Australia of all places

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well, neither is true, though. Newer generations don't just magically have less patience. Nor children today are more prone to tantrums and screaming than children in the past 30 million years. That's just good old, "back in my days", backwards thinking that has, ironically, also always existed amongst the older generations.

It's a song and dance, driven by evolution, it has happened before and it will continue to happen. As this thread and hundreds of threads, and newspaper articles, and postcards, and letters, and books, and clay tablets and campfire rants have proven, ever since humans developed speech.

Kids these days.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The internet has drastically and measurably changed the behavior and attention span of children.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Socrates said the same thing about books.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

And that is equally true.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

We said the same thing. Of the TV. And the radio before that. And of the comics before that. And of the theater before that. And of the circus before that. Etc.

We ought to be careful of many pseudoscientific claims. Specially in psychology. We don't have a control group of children before the advent of the internet to compare today's children with. The "i 'member!" crowd are now all adults, a group who are notoriously biased and bad at being objective regarding their own childhood.

We can compare today's children with and without certain habits, and indeed it has been found that mobile internet access, and social media specially, are detrimental to children in some personality development aspects and cognitive skills. But this is not a pass to make broad generalizations of entire generations of all children and parents across the globe. That's just generational bigotry.

Like, different habits lead to different behaviors? Sure, no shit. But that doesn't change the fundamental make up of human beings.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

I'm a little confused why you don't think there have been journaled studies on the differences between children with access to technology and those without. Some examples are impoverished communities and countries and people in strict religious sects. TV, radio, books, they have all had an impact on they way brains develop and process information. Biologically no, if you pluck a newborn and place them in North Sentinel Island, they will adapt perfectly. But that's the thing, the human mind is meant to adapt to its surroundings. The surrounding of the majority of children today is being absolutely bombarded with distractions, and it has a measurable affect on behavior across the board.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Every child i encounter is extremely well behaved

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

I wish I could say the same for middle aged suburban moms. Fucking miserable people.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see a lot of objectionable behavior out in public. A lot of it is from children. But most of it is not. If I'm thinking through my 10 worst flight experiences, or subway experiences, or coffee shop experiences, none of them involve children. Children are mostly a mild annoyance (and I say this as someone who mostly doesn't like other people's kids), but mostly harmless.

So the reaction of singling out the children for immediate correction, through physical force and violence, seems to be selectively targeted, and makes me suspect it's just people who just don't like children. Unless these same people say that a person holding up the line, playing music too loud on the subway, getting too close in your personal space, throwing trash on the ground, catcalling women, using slurs in public, etc., all deserve to be beaten, too.

And for people in the thread who are saying stuff like "oh yeah you shouldn't beat your kids, but you should keep those children out of public places," it also calls to mind the way some people talk about the homeless or the disabled, like they're ruining your good time by simply existing within your vicinity.

We're all just trying to coexist. Being in public, in a place open and accessible to everyone else, is inherently going to involve compromise, where we're not able to exclude others (the deal that comes with them not being able to exclude you). You can't let other people aggravate you enough to, like, post a TikTok about it (which I also consider to be objectionable behavior).

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 6 points 18 hours ago

The kind of attitude you are talking about here is btw called adultism, which is a selective bias against children.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My 11-month old is an absolute saint when we're out and about, then a horrifying tornado of destruction when he's at home. I suspect a lot of it is just boredom, but its hard to tell because... 11-mo olds aren't great at verbalizing their discontent.

As he gets older and he starts losing that starstruck look of wonderment at the mall or a new restaurant or wherever, I suspect he'll be harder to control. But he's also incredibly clever, athletic, and curious. I don't want to discourage any of this just to make parenting a bit easier in the short term.

Can't fucking imagine actually hitting him. I know what that did to me after the rare few times my mom did it. I still can't bring myself to forgive her 30 years later. And there's no way I want my son thinking of me that way.

[–] washbasin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago

They're experiencing restraint collapse.

You're doing a great job parenting! It's one of the most difficult jobs in the world to do well. Restraint collapse is a great indicator that you're doing well. It's also hell because you take everything on. Thank you for parenting well.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

My mom had 4 kids. 3 of us were well behaved in public and she said "I would look at those parents with screaming kids in the store and think I am doing something right, my kids don't do that. So God gave me Janet. I was so judgemental, then I got one who screamed in the store."

load more comments
view more: next ›