-
He thinks that is subtle language when it is so painfully clear what he's saying.
-
Even stylistically, those are not big breasts. They are small, and high. And while I am not one of those people who thinks folks who like small breasts are pedophiles, he did not send Jeffrey Epstein your typical big boobed stick figure sketch. Nay, nay. That's all I'm saying.
Microblog Memes
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
Those aren't breasts. Those are breast buds. 🤢🤮
Yeah, I'd give the benefit of the doubt if it wasn't being sent to Jeffery fucking Epstein. Also, we've seen dementia don's taste in adult women and he's not a fan of small breasts on adult women.
Good point, but on the other hand, the sketch doesn't include arms, so I think the argument that he's just bad at art could probably be pretty convincing. Plenty of other evidence that he's a pedophile.
If you're bad at art, it's much easier to draw big boobs than small ones. Big boobs are just circles. People learn to draw circles as toddlers. Whether or not he's a good artist, he made a deliberate artistic choice, in both the size and placement of those breasts.
What is it that you think he is saying. It doesn't seem obvious to me but I am 99% confident that it is something about raping a child and that they both know what happened.
It just seems a weird format, almost like a Freemason greeting?
Thank God Epstein's dead, because I'm pretty sure Trump would have appointed him head of Federal Child Protective Services.
It's horrific that he absolutely would've
I mean pedo shit aside, that's a way shittier card and drawing than I imagined. A second grader could draw something more artistic, damn.
He sold this for $30k.
It makes the NY skyline look like a bunch of dicks with an enlarged right testicle.
$30k.
shitty artists and fascism, name a more iconic duo
Check out Hitler's paintings. He didn't get into art school, sure, but they aren't awful. It is certainly beyond anything the average person could just draw without practice. This is just garbage.
Charisma and creativity with no healthy outlet results in trying to force people to love you. Peddling hatred unfortunately works on some.
Except its charisma and an unwillingness to put in ~~effort~~ vulnerability to improve at things. Learning creative endeavors as an adult sucks. It forces you to humble yourself, see your failures, and adapt. As a kid that's par for the course, as a teenager many people still are doing it, but some have locked up and grown prideful, but as an adult that's a skill you often have to relearn and with creativity you often feel like you should have learned it younger or like you should be good at it.
Narcissistic personality traits involve fearing vulnerability and using ego to shield oneself from being hurt. Fascist leaders have those traits. This isn't saying all people with NPD are fascists or all fascists have npd, but that that fascist movements begin leaderless and coalesce around someone who agrees with them and will at the very least act like they have untreated, unexamined, and rampant narcissism. Also that being in that role has to fuck you up mentally and push your mental processes further and further towards those traits. Like vulnerability becomes materially costly when your movement hinges on your perceived strength and you've violated laws and broken society.
Art auctions are a money laundering scam anyway.
Who is this up and coming artist?! That piece will certainly hang in the Met one day.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
The phrasing, the drawing, yeah they raped a child together. Fucking sickening.
for sure more than one child tbf
To be fair, this really sounds way too artisan for him
Here's an "illustration" of his that he drew in the 90's and sold in 2017 for $30k.
He's artisan enough to grift. I feel he's artisan enough to draw a woman with suspiciously small breasts.
He still signed it.
May he who has never signed a letter embellishing secrets addressed to a pedophile cast the first stone.
Oh, wait that's me. I'll throw first. Fuck these rapists.
I'm in agreement here, it also seems an odd thing to send to someone for their birthday? Like it's a made up conversation between the two, right? What kind of birthday message is that?
It’s the nonsensical ramblings of an idiot, meant to sound profound but they lack any depth whatsoever - just like his speeches.
You're too used to his 2025, dementia-addled brain.
I'm not saying he was ever smart, but he was a lot more fluent back in 2001 for example.
What the actual fuck.
Ironically, this could have all been prevented if there had not actually been any ~~fucking~~ rape.
America can't even pick a good dictator. Hitler was a way better artist, smh.
is trumps signature on the bottom suppose to represent pubes?
No pubes would indicate an age too old for him
I think so for sure
Yes
Thats nice, now do the unredacted client list
there are no files to release. Also, he's all over those files that don't exist.
this isnt new? we saw this a while ago did we not?
They hadn't released the image until today... And I think from the description everyone assumed that they would be women's breasts, not young girl breasts.
We knew the content of the letter in July, but didn't have the actual picture. The one you're probably remembering which looked significantly less shitty was just someone's interpretation of its description.
Laughing a bit at everyone's comments on his art style. Us old folks remember Trump: The Game.
This may be the least tacky thing I've seen this man create.
He never writes * pictures checkmate