this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
938 points (99.4% liked)

World News

49650 readers
2670 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The artwork, which shows a judge hitting a protester with a gavel, was confirmed by the elusive street artist.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

One of two security officers outside the building said they did not know how much longer they would be required to stand guard, adding, "At least it's not raining."

There's nothing I love more than hearing British people complain about being forced to do the one job that they have. Miserable sods.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

he should have painted Keir Starmer's face on it

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s a good piece of art

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just dropped this in another thread, best copy I've found of just the mural:

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not showing for me somehow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Yeah I was gonna say, that's a fucking awesome piece! What do they do in situations like this? Paint over it?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They cordoned it off and covered it with tarps or sheets. They don't want to paint over it or destroy it because it's instantly worth a fortune and nobody knows exactly what to do, which is part of the genius of it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago

It is just delicious how their knee-jerk reaction of "lets hide it" reveals so much about their mindset and how much that mural hits the target as critique of the true role of their profession in present day Britain.

They reacted as the guilty do, not the innocent.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 day ago

Yeah I saw in the article that they covered it up and posted guards. Kind of ironic if they end up removing the section of wall and making a ton of money selling it.

"Look, Banksy thinks we're committing atrocities! We're gonna be rich!!"

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it’s instantly worth a fortune

The whole point of Banksy is most of his public work cannot be resold.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"He no longer sells photographs or reproductions of his street graffiti, but his public "installations" are regularly resold, often even by removing the wall on which they were painted"

The latest articles have also stated that the art will be preserved for it's "historic value" which is even more funny. They don't want anyone to see it, they find it offensive and deeply troubling for calling out abuse of power... but they are going to spend a fortune to preserve it or resell it in some way.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago

To a degree, people will cut out chunks of wall to sell a banksy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah they plan on painting over it. They covered it up and put two policemen to guard it to make sure nobody looks at it.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not dystopian or anything.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 22 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The UK is about just as fucked up as the United States is right now in a lot of ways, their leader is just don't say stupid shit constantly. They have basically made it illegal to protest, not just on the Gaza on a lot of stuff, environmental, global warming, and the judges just took away the defenses protesters were using, not allowing them to say why they were doing it. And they are hitting him with these huge sentences is not like it's months in jail we're talking years or more.

Just to give you an idea of where they are at there was another recent case where a woman that took some abortion pills that she got from the doctor as per their laws was charged under some like 19th century law with some huge felony charge. She got not guilty but not for lack of trying on the prosecutor's part.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

Guess we finally found who we're not allowed to criticise.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] shane@feddit.nl 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While the mural does not reference a particular cause or incident, its appearance comes two days after almost 900 people were arrested at a London protest against the ban on Palestine Action.

This seems nonsensical to me.

If it were in reference to a particular issue, would that make Banksy a "terrorist?" Maybe it's better to feign uncertainty at the BBC.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cut it out and send it to the Louvre Museum.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Or to Athens. You know both the birthplace of democracy and the origin of the stolen Elgin marbles.

They are owed an even larger apology due to the rape of democracy that's taken place.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What, because we allowed women, commoners and slaves the vote?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Mainly because of the 'philosopher king' infringement tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The West is dismantling every shibboleth, every sacred cow, in service to genocidal Zionism.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

There's a lot of West in the West.

That said, you're exactly right for certain Western countries such as Britain, America and Germany.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How does one confirm a true Banksy from a fake when nobody knows who he actually is? How do you verify the Banksy who confirmed it's legit is legit?

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are posted by their Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/banksy/

I don't know if all their works are on there though

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of funny for someone like Banksy to still have to join somewhere like Instagram.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I get your point, but if you're doing political activism, you need to meet the people where they are

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

People do know who he is.

[–] klu9@piefed.social 53 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Nitpick: it's Parliament who proscribed Palestine Action, not the courts.

[–] Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is the courts upholding it though.

It took like two months now that Palestine Action are allowed to get an appeals hearing in November iirc.
Courts could have decided for the proscription to not be applicable until a proper hearing takes place. Instead it was upheld.

Yea the decision to ban it went through so fast it was hard to have a defence, but the appeals are all delayed now they have one.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cross nitpick: Just because the courts are following Parliament's 'law' in no way negates their complicity in doing wrong.

See Nazi guards following Hitler's rules for reference.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›