Russian politicians in Russia orchestrating the war, too, are legitimate targets
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
It's pretty ironic that there is a big chance there would be no NATO troops in Ukraine if Putin didn't attack Ukraine "because they might join NATO". By doing what he did he got exactly what he tried not to get.
Russian troops would be too.
Yes because it's a war
K
Then Russian troops in Ukraine would be legitimate targets for western troops
Your move
Right? What the fuck is he blabbing on about?
Russian troops in Ukraine are already legitimate targets.
Yes, but right now western troops aren't engaging russians, that's what this is about
Pootin is a legitimate target. Fuck him!
Overall, it seems Putin and Trump prefer to continue escalating the situation. Their rethoric mounts to something like this: " Why can't Europe & Ukraine just behave, and do as they are told."
Seems again, both oligarchs don't want a peaceful solution. Unfortunately, we are running out of options here.
War makes money for the rich, of course they love it. Ya make money and the poors get culled, win win ib their eyes...
Not just the poors, but it's usually the meatheads that get sent to war. On both sides, you'll find some of the most deplorable people are the most entrenched in war culture. They don't value their lives and see themselves as having no better options.
I hope one day we understand some of the philosophy behind war, and whether or not it's necessary when there are "too many soldiers."
Not in this setup. He makes issues even selling weapons to Ukraine.
He likely is getting personal money for sabotaging Ukraine (most likely by the shit coins he set up)
He is playing middleman, selling to Ukraine and bad mouthing for Putin, ib the end the military industrial complex still wins
What he did is to make Europe desperately look to produce as much weapons as they can to replace US ones.
Also MIC was huge during could war, but does it really matter today? Put Boeing or Lockheed Martin next to Apple, Google, Amazing etc It is no longer significant compared with tech industry.
A dumb take considering the imperialist (and genocidal) history of russia.
They weren't doing good in the 90s, didn't stop them for invading Moldova, Ichkeria and getting involved in the Caucasus with malicious intentions.
Russia economy is currently running off of war. If it ends Russia is fucked as the only other money maker they have is oil and it will be a good decadw before they can get back to pre war production.
Maybe ya should read General Smedley Buttlers 'War is a racket'
What does this have to do with russian imperialism?
Was the russian economy running off of war in the 90s too?
Does Smedly Buttlers speak russian? I am genuinely curious.
Read the damn speech
1990 ≠ 2025
It doesnt matter, he explains why war is a racket with in depth personal knowledge of why it is.
Putin is a power hungry goblin, in this world money is power. If ya don't understand that then you shouldnt be replying
No, chances are I have more in-depth personal knowledge of war than that fellow (don't forget, the russians invaded in 2014).
To claim that all of war is based on cold war era "military industrial complex" polemics is ahistorical and doesn't align with reality.
If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.
Well no point in going any further wirh this convo, you think you know more about war and what a military complex is than a general who had served in multiple wars, all while you dont know what a military industrial complex is. You have 0 interest in learning what it is. Also Smedley wrote the speech in 1934 before there was WWII, yet alone cold war. And the military industrial complex was alive then too.
If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.
No, it can not be summed up in 3-5 sentences, thag ia why he wrote the fucking speech, read the damn speech, ya wasted more time writing this than it would have taken to read the fucking thing.
Russia is as genocidal as western countries they still sell weapon to israel to exterminate palestinians
No, this is incorrect.
Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel.
And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century).
One thing that I learned after moving to Lemmy is how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western "leftists" are in their thinking.
No wonder we have the rise of Donald Trump and significant gains among far right/pro-corruption forces.
There are of course other factors too (information age etc.), but I digress.
how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western “leftists” are in their thinking
Leftist here. Those sockpuppets and fools have nothing to do with what I or anyone I know believes.
Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel
The most powererful ones does sell weapons to israel though. Even buying from them allow israel to use thay money to reinvest in the genocide
And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century)
When you read history you see how the other was as bad as russisn history of bloody especially the usa
You clearly have no clue what you are talking if you think russia is anywhere close to the US.
It would be like if during the invasion of Iraq, the US annexed Basra, banned Islam, sent anyone caught speaking arabic into basement torture camps and sent hundreds of thousand Iraqi children to Texas and made them eat pork chops and read about how great US oligarchs are.
So you were wrong about all western countries selling weapons to Israel.
It's a war so yes it is ligitimate for both side to fight each others
Give it a try, see how well that goes
The actual western troops will bring the actual western weapons and in a non nuclear war, Russia will fold, even with the somewhat limited amount of weapons that Europe currently has
Russia can barely keep up with Ukraine having very limited western support. If the real weapons are taken out, they will be fucked.
I agree, this is definitely a bluff worth calling.
We've already seen mercenaries from the West get killed by Russians.
You believe a lot of bullshit.
According to governments and most citizens, mercenaries are different from the states own military. The results would be different.
I am still just pissed that they keep killing people in general but hey, I guess I'm the weird one.
Putin on Friday said any guarantees that involved boots on the ground would violate Moscow’s longstanding objections to Nato troops in Ukraine.
What does that even mean? How do you violate someone else's standards that you didn't agree to, that's not "violating" anything, that's just them not liking it.
all world leaders should be forced to have an explosive device surgically implanted into their chests to take office.
at any time the people of their country can take a vote to remove them from office, and if passed detonates the explosive at a random time in a 24 hour window after the vote has been validated.
This, please
Imagine that." The people have voted today...." Well..they'll find out soon enough.
Also, most worldleaders aren't as extreme, but for sure " 100% democracy proof" implant would be an insurance/ h
I would like it to be like in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
“At the sound of the cann…” BOOM
Western troops would wipe the effing floor with the russians. Air superiority would be instantaneous. The war -- in Ukrane at least--would end quickly.
More famous last words have never been spoken. How many times throughout history have people said this? I'd imagine leading up to every war...
AH yes, the famous Russian air force. Everyone knows having dead pilots in crashed planes is a tactical advantage. I'm sure the west will find them most challenging.
So it’s zombie pilots, then.
This assumes a full blown war. Not sending just mechanics to maintain the F16 given to Ukraine and a bunch of training officer.
Moreover, while I doubt Russia can win a conventional war, Russia is more than machine gun mounted a Toyota pick up trucks, 20year old kids will die, and not sure western government are ready for it, especially with the weight of pro Russian politicians. This is how you loose a war despite a "mathematical" advantage
We need an answer to Putin's shenanigans and we havent been pursuing one in any serious manner. He's been in a low level war with the west for decades while we offer him refreshments and listen to his blather. He and Russia should be treated like North Korea.
It took over 10 years to end syrian regime. It will definitely take as much to end the ukraine invension even with western support on the ground
Western troops would wipe the effing floor with the russians.
Does this mean that US will guarantee the backstop?
Are we waiting on the US to approve or disapprove every political action in the world? Or after Ukraine has managed to hold Russia to almost no territorial gains for years are we pretending Russia is an unstoppable and well funded military force?
If citizens in other countries want to be slaves to the crazy US, I guess thats ok. Get me another latte.
Are we waiting on the US to approve or disapprove every political action in the world?
Too late. The US already has a ton of influence here and is currently content with supplying Ukraine with just enough to hold off Russia but nothing more. If the other western countries increase their support, the US will just scale back an equal amount.