this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
133 points (97.2% liked)

World News

49621 readers
1755 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vladimir Putin has said any western troops placed in Ukraine would be “legitimate targets” for Russian strikes, upping the stakes as Kyiv’s allies scramble to come up with a convincing offer of postwar support to Ukraine.

Speaking a day after the French president, Emmanuel Macron, announced still-vague plans for a package of support for Ukraine backed by 26 nations, Putin on Friday said any guarantees that involved boots on the ground would violate Moscow’s longstanding objections to Nato troops in Ukraine.

Add: See for more context this other news post

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Russian politicians in Russia orchestrating the war, too, are legitimate targets

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

It's pretty ironic that there is a big chance there would be no NATO troops in Ukraine if Putin didn't attack Ukraine "because they might join NATO". By doing what he did he got exactly what he tried not to get.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Russian troops would be too.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Yes because it's a war

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

K

Then Russian troops in Ukraine would be legitimate targets for western troops

Your move

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Right? What the fuck is he blabbing on about?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russian troops in Ukraine are already legitimate targets.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes, but right now western troops aren't engaging russians, that's what this is about

[–] Gudl@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Pootin is a legitimate target. Fuck him!

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Overall, it seems Putin and Trump prefer to continue escalating the situation. Their rethoric mounts to something like this: " Why can't Europe & Ukraine just behave, and do as they are told."

Seems again, both oligarchs don't want a peaceful solution. Unfortunately, we are running out of options here.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

War makes money for the rich, of course they love it. Ya make money and the poors get culled, win win ib their eyes...

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not just the poors, but it's usually the meatheads that get sent to war. On both sides, you'll find some of the most deplorable people are the most entrenched in war culture. They don't value their lives and see themselves as having no better options.

I hope one day we understand some of the philosophy behind war, and whether or not it's necessary when there are "too many soldiers."

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not in this setup. He makes issues even selling weapons to Ukraine.

He likely is getting personal money for sabotaging Ukraine (most likely by the shit coins he set up)

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He is playing middleman, selling to Ukraine and bad mouthing for Putin, ib the end the military industrial complex still wins

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

What he did is to make Europe desperately look to produce as much weapons as they can to replace US ones.

Also MIC was huge during could war, but does it really matter today? Put Boeing or Lockheed Martin next to Apple, Google, Amazing etc It is no longer significant compared with tech industry.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A dumb take considering the imperialist (and genocidal) history of russia.

They weren't doing good in the 90s, didn't stop them for invading Moldova, Ichkeria and getting involved in the Caucasus with malicious intentions.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russia economy is currently running off of war. If it ends Russia is fucked as the only other money maker they have is oil and it will be a good decadw before they can get back to pre war production.

Maybe ya should read General Smedley Buttlers 'War is a racket'

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does this have to do with russian imperialism?

Was the russian economy running off of war in the 90s too?

Does Smedly Buttlers speak russian? I am genuinely curious.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Read the damn speech

1990 ≠ 2025

It doesnt matter, he explains why war is a racket with in depth personal knowledge of why it is.

Putin is a power hungry goblin, in this world money is power. If ya don't understand that then you shouldnt be replying

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, chances are I have more in-depth personal knowledge of war than that fellow (don't forget, the russians invaded in 2014).

To claim that all of war is based on cold war era "military industrial complex" polemics is ahistorical and doesn't align with reality.

If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Well no point in going any further wirh this convo, you think you know more about war and what a military complex is than a general who had served in multiple wars, all while you dont know what a military industrial complex is. You have 0 interest in learning what it is. Also Smedley wrote the speech in 1934 before there was WWII, yet alone cold war. And the military industrial complex was alive then too.

If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

No, it can not be summed up in 3-5 sentences, thag ia why he wrote the fucking speech, read the damn speech, ya wasted more time writing this than it would have taken to read the fucking thing.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russia is as genocidal as western countries they still sell weapon to israel to exterminate palestinians

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, this is incorrect.

Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel.

And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century).

One thing that I learned after moving to Lemmy is how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western "leftists" are in their thinking.

No wonder we have the rise of Donald Trump and significant gains among far right/pro-corruption forces.

There are of course other factors too (information age etc.), but I digress.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western “leftists” are in their thinking

Leftist here. Those sockpuppets and fools have nothing to do with what I or anyone I know believes.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel

The most powererful ones does sell weapons to israel though. Even buying from them allow israel to use thay money to reinvest in the genocide

And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century)

When you read history you see how the other was as bad as russisn history of bloody especially the usa

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

You clearly have no clue what you are talking if you think russia is anywhere close to the US.

It would be like if during the invasion of Iraq, the US annexed Basra, banned Islam, sent anyone caught speaking arabic into basement torture camps and sent hundreds of thousand Iraqi children to Texas and made them eat pork chops and read about how great US oligarchs are.

So you were wrong about all western countries selling weapons to Israel.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

It's a war so yes it is ligitimate for both side to fight each others

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Give it a try, see how well that goes

The actual western troops will bring the actual western weapons and in a non nuclear war, Russia will fold, even with the somewhat limited amount of weapons that Europe currently has

Russia can barely keep up with Ukraine having very limited western support. If the real weapons are taken out, they will be fucked.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I agree, this is definitely a bluff worth calling.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've already seen mercenaries from the West get killed by Russians.

You believe a lot of bullshit.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

According to governments and most citizens, mercenaries are different from the states own military. The results would be different.

I am still just pissed that they keep killing people in general but hey, I guess I'm the weird one.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago

Putin on Friday said any guarantees that involved boots on the ground would violate Moscow’s longstanding objections to Nato troops in Ukraine.

What does that even mean? How do you violate someone else's standards that you didn't agree to, that's not "violating" anything, that's just them not liking it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

all world leaders should be forced to have an explosive device surgically implanted into their chests to take office.

at any time the people of their country can take a vote to remove them from office, and if passed detonates the explosive at a random time in a 24 hour window after the vote has been validated.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

This, please

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Imagine that." The people have voted today...." Well..they'll find out soon enough.

Also, most worldleaders aren't as extreme, but for sure " 100% democracy proof" implant would be an insurance/ h

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

I would like it to be like in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

“At the sound of the cann…” BOOM

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Western troops would wipe the effing floor with the russians. Air superiority would be instantaneous. The war -- in Ukrane at least--would end quickly.

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More famous last words have never been spoken. How many times throughout history have people said this? I'd imagine leading up to every war...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

AH yes, the famous Russian air force. Everyone knows having dead pilots in crashed planes is a tactical advantage. I'm sure the west will find them most challenging.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

So it’s zombie pilots, then.

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This assumes a full blown war. Not sending just mechanics to maintain the F16 given to Ukraine and a bunch of training officer.

Moreover, while I doubt Russia can win a conventional war, Russia is more than machine gun mounted a Toyota pick up trucks, 20year old kids will die, and not sure western government are ready for it, especially with the weight of pro Russian politicians. This is how you loose a war despite a "mathematical" advantage

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

We need an answer to Putin's shenanigans and we havent been pursuing one in any serious manner. He's been in a low level war with the west for decades while we offer him refreshments and listen to his blather. He and Russia should be treated like North Korea.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It took over 10 years to end syrian regime. It will definitely take as much to end the ukraine invension even with western support on the ground

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Western troops would wipe the effing floor with the russians.

Does this mean that US will guarantee the backstop?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we waiting on the US to approve or disapprove every political action in the world? Or after Ukraine has managed to hold Russia to almost no territorial gains for years are we pretending Russia is an unstoppable and well funded military force?

If citizens in other countries want to be slaves to the crazy US, I guess thats ok. Get me another latte.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Are we waiting on the US to approve or disapprove every political action in the world?

Too late. The US already has a ton of influence here and is currently content with supplying Ukraine with just enough to hold off Russia but nothing more. If the other western countries increase their support, the US will just scale back an equal amount.