this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
137 points (97.2% liked)

World News

49621 readers
2119 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vladimir Putin has said any western troops placed in Ukraine would be “legitimate targets” for Russian strikes, upping the stakes as Kyiv’s allies scramble to come up with a convincing offer of postwar support to Ukraine.

Speaking a day after the French president, Emmanuel Macron, announced still-vague plans for a package of support for Ukraine backed by 26 nations, Putin on Friday said any guarantees that involved boots on the ground would violate Moscow’s longstanding objections to Nato troops in Ukraine.

Add: See for more context this other news post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

War makes money for the rich, of course they love it. Ya make money and the poors get culled, win win ib their eyes...

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not in this setup. He makes issues even selling weapons to Ukraine.

He likely is getting personal money for sabotaging Ukraine (most likely by the shit coins he set up)

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He is playing middleman, selling to Ukraine and bad mouthing for Putin, ib the end the military industrial complex still wins

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

What he did is to make Europe desperately look to produce as much weapons as they can to replace US ones.

Also MIC was huge during could war, but does it really matter today? Put Boeing or Lockheed Martin next to Apple, Google, Amazing etc It is no longer significant compared with tech industry.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not just the poors, but it's usually the meatheads that get sent to war. On both sides, you'll find some of the most deplorable people are the most entrenched in war culture. They don't value their lives and see themselves as having no better options.

I hope one day we understand some of the philosophy behind war, and whether or not it's necessary when there are "too many soldiers."

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A dumb take considering the imperialist (and genocidal) history of russia.

They weren't doing good in the 90s, didn't stop them for invading Moldova, Ichkeria and getting involved in the Caucasus with malicious intentions.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Russia economy is currently running off of war. If it ends Russia is fucked as the only other money maker they have is oil and it will be a good decadw before they can get back to pre war production.

Maybe ya should read General Smedley Buttlers 'War is a racket'

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What does this have to do with russian imperialism?

Was the russian economy running off of war in the 90s too?

Does Smedly Buttlers speak russian? I am genuinely curious.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Read the damn speech

1990 ≠ 2025

It doesnt matter, he explains why war is a racket with in depth personal knowledge of why it is.

Putin is a power hungry goblin, in this world money is power. If ya don't understand that then you shouldnt be replying

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, chances are I have more in-depth personal knowledge of war than that fellow (don't forget, the russians invaded in 2014).

To claim that all of war is based on cold war era "military industrial complex" polemics is ahistorical and doesn't align with reality.

If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Well no point in going any further wirh this convo, you think you know more about war and what a military complex is than a general who had served in multiple wars, all while you dont know what a military industrial complex is. You have 0 interest in learning what it is. Also Smedley wrote the speech in 1934 before there was WWII, yet alone cold war. And the military industrial complex was alive then too.

If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

No, it can not be summed up in 3-5 sentences, thag ia why he wrote the fucking speech, read the damn speech, ya wasted more time writing this than it would have taken to read the fucking thing.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Russia is as genocidal as western countries they still sell weapon to israel to exterminate palestinians

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, this is incorrect.

Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel.

And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century).

One thing that I learned after moving to Lemmy is how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western "leftists" are in their thinking.

No wonder we have the rise of Donald Trump and significant gains among far right/pro-corruption forces.

There are of course other factors too (information age etc.), but I digress.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

how vapid, trope-like and uninspired western “leftists” are in their thinking

Leftist here. Those sockpuppets and fools have nothing to do with what I or anyone I know believes.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not all western countries sell weapons to Israel

The most powererful ones does sell weapons to israel though. Even buying from them allow israel to use thay money to reinvest in the genocide

And you need to read up on russian history (at least 20th century)

When you read history you see how the other was as bad as russisn history of bloody especially the usa

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago

You clearly have no clue what you are talking if you think russia is anywhere close to the US.

It would be like if during the invasion of Iraq, the US annexed Basra, banned Islam, sent anyone caught speaking arabic into basement torture camps and sent hundreds of thousand Iraqi children to Texas and made them eat pork chops and read about how great US oligarchs are.

So you were wrong about all western countries selling weapons to Israel.