this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

news

24264 readers
782 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They deadass screenshotted his apology note and posted it to twitter as a response lol.https://xcancel.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1963635111112446449

Full Article

A senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official told an undercover journalist there are "thousands and thousands of pages" of files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case and that if they are released by the Trump administration "they'll redact every Republican or conservative person."

Joseph Schnitt, currently acting deputy chief at the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations made the claim while being secretly recorded on what he believed was a date, with footage posted on X by independent journalist James O'Keefe.

Newsweek contacted the DOJ and Federal Bureau of Prisons for comment on Friday via email and online inquiry form respectively outside of regular office hours.

Why It Matters

In July the DOJ and FBI released a joint statement saying convicted sex offender Epstein had "no incriminating 'client list'" angering a section of Trump's base who believe details of Epstein's activities are being covered up to protect accomplices. In June 2024 Trump had pledged to release the Epstein case files if elected president for a second term.

Authorities say Epstein died by suicide at Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019, while awaiting trial on federal charges of sex trafficking minors, though some conspiracy theorists believe he was murdered.

The Epstein case has sparked rare criticism of Trump from prominent members of his Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

What To Know

Schnitt was secretly recorded by a reporter working for O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas, during what he believed to be a data with a woman. According to Schnitt he met the woman, who gave her name as Skylar, on dating app Hinge.During the date Schnitt said he was a 23-year veteran of the DOJ who was about to become "deputy chief of our office for a few months starting next week."

Asked if the Epstein files "do exist" Schnitt replied: "There's files for sure. There's, yeah, thousands and thousands of pages of files."

Schnitt said there was "internal conflict" within the Trump administration over how to handle the files. When asked what Attorney General Pam Bondi wanted to do he replied: "I don't know what Bondi wants. Bondi wants whatever Trump wants. She's just a yes-person."

Schnitt went on to say if further Epstein files are released they will be "heavily redacted and his [Trump's] name won't be in it."

He added: "They'll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files and have a very slanted version of it come out where it's 'look at what's going on' without really seeing any of their [Republicans'] bad behavior."

On August 1 it was confirmed Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's close associate who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, had been moved to a new minimum security facility in Texas. This came after she held two meetings with the deputy U.S. attorney general in July regarding what she knew about the Epstein case.

During the recording Schnitt says: "She [Maxwell] got transferred to a minimum security prison, too, recently, which is against BOP [Bureau of Prisons] policy because she's a convicted sex offender and they're not supposed to get minimum security prisons, which is an interesting detail because she's getting a benefit, which means they're [DOJ] offering her something to keep her mouth shut."

Project Veritas acquired a following, particularly on the right, by secretly recording meetings involving progressive groups and vaccine manufacturers.

What People Are Saying

In a statement sent to O'Keefe the DOJ said: "Joseph Schnitt had no role in the Department's internal review of Epstein materials. He has confirmed as much to leadership and we plan to publish his written statement to that effect when we have it. In his own words, the comments Mr. Schnitt made were based on 'what he learned in the media' and he 'has no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Ms. Maxwell other than what was reported in the news.'"

The DOJ later published a note from Schnitt on X in which he said: "I met a woman named Skylar on Hinge, a dating app, in July 2025, her profile is no longer findable. We had two dates (August 4 and August 16). She claimed to be an au pair in Georgetown. She gave no clues that she was a reporter or recording our dates. Had I a clue, the first date would have ended immediately and there never would have been a second one...

"The comments I made were my own personal comments on what I've learned in the media and not from anything I've done at or learned via work. I have no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Ms. Maxwell other than what is reported in the news. I also never divulged anything about what I do at work. I recall that she asked if I had any knowledge about Maxwell and I specifically said I only know what's been reported in the media." What Happens Next

Despite insisting he was only commenting on media reports, Schnitt's comments are likely to further increase pressure on the Trump administration regarding what it knows about the Epstein case and whether more information will be released.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IdoneFarsberry@hexbear.net 5 points 12 hours ago

This is what I expected. I'm more interested in the list the victims are supposedly putting together.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 31 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Calling anybody working for or with project veritas a "journalist" is really elevating them way above their station. This video is edited just like any other project veritas hit piece. If you watch the video, notice it starts basically mid sentence, we don't hear the question or the beginning of the answer. From what I've seen it seems to me like this bozo was just telling the woman what he thinks is likely to happen, not what he knows is happening.

Don't pay attention to project veritas just because they're putting out shit that pleases you, that's what's kept that turd going for a decade.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 19 points 18 hours ago

An evergreen meme in the year 2025:

[–] LangleyDominos@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

From what I've seen it seems to me like this bozo was just telling the woman what he thinks is likely to happen, not what he knows is happening.

That's just as bad though because this guy works for and with the people that would be doing the cover-up. A mid or high ranking member of the DOJ they don't have faith that their co-workers will be truthful is the story.

[–] Biddles@hexbear.net 7 points 17 hours ago

From what I can tell, he was just some low level dork

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If the guy said he thought the DOJ was going to actually release unedited incriminating evidence on Epstein's associates, it would be worse, because he would clearly be too naive to be allowed in public. This is just nothing, just some clown sharing the same opinion a majority of Americans have about this thing.

[–] LangleyDominos@hexbear.net 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, we all know they'll cover it up but we're not working for the DOJ and certainly not in management.

I'm aware of what Veritas is and what they've put out in the past. They could have buttered him up with asking his opinions about what's being said online and podcasts and all that. But an active member of the DOJ's management saying he thinks his coworkers are crooks is a story in any context. If O'Kefe gets publicity out of this it's only because the oh so trustworthy media that totally asks the right questions and never edits anything aren't doing their jobs. I'm not saying make Veritas part of your news diet, just that this is a major cock-up for the DOJ.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 5 points 17 hours ago

saying he thinks his coworkers are crooks is a story in any context.

This is my point. We don't know if that's what he was saying. He might have been asked what he thinks the Democrats will say if they release things. The context of the question and parts of his statement has been removed. It has been removed because project veritas is in the business of editing footage to make it seem like it's saying something it isn't.

this is a major cock-up for the DOJ.

There's no doubt about that, but there's also no shortage of major cock-ups by the DOJ like doing a fake-ass "proffer" with Maxwell where she doesn't "proffer" a damn thing except nice words for Trump and outright denials of facts proven in her trial.

Project veritas is a disinformation outlet. Taking anything they release with any seriousness is the wrong move.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 34 points 19 hours ago

Honestly why not. Release the names of Dems, get them all arrested and jailed, and then when the Dems have power again and get their turn they...won't do anything, because they're spineless. Your voting base won't care if you are an abuser because hey at least you stuck it to those Dems, so there is quite literally no downside to this.

Dems need to realize that you do actually have to fight to win, but they won't, so they'll lose yet again and we'll see a continuation of nothing actually changing.

It's not even a brilliant 4D chess move it's just the obvious one. If you can punch your opponent in the face consequence free forever why wouldn't you

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 18 points 17 hours ago

Republicans are liberals too, though, right?

[–] ComRed2@hexbear.net 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao how is this not a blatant admission of guilt??? i-cant

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 16 hours ago

They won’t release the republican names 👀

[–] corvidenjoyer@hexbear.net 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

he's in deep Schnitt now

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 26 points 22 hours ago

Did anyone seriously believe he was going to release information that implicates him in crimes or his billionaire buddies? ofc he's going to blame it on the liberal Epstein guests while leaving himself out.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 21 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The project veritas guy is revealing something…good?

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Surely this time will be the one time project veritas isn't bending the truth, surely.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] corvidenjoyer@hexbear.net 16 points 21 hours ago

I guess some of them really do care about epstein?

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 16 hours ago

He’s revealing that they have a list of both republican and democrat names….

[–] SmithrunHills@hexbear.net 13 points 19 hours ago

"Department of ""Justice"""

Funny joke you got there, amerikkka

fuck yes dude, rip the mask right off and expose these "hallowed institutions" for the blatantly unfair bullshit they've always been

[–] mendiCAN@hexbear.net 6 points 19 hours ago

fucking do it. DO ITTT skeleton-guns-akimbo I don't for a second think they'll release shit but can you imagine what would happen? mmmm cool-zone

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I feel like Ken Watanabe in Godzilla, just going "Let Them Fight". Anybody still cheer leading Clinton or any other big dog Dem, deserves this just as much as when Trump finally gets outed for pedophilia.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 2 points 17 hours ago