this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
546 points (99.3% liked)

News

32034 readers
2361 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is something where there is no excuse but greed.

The wages of flight attendants are a drop in the ocean compared to everything else for operating a plane.

As usual, they attack the ones who can't fight back.

HOWEVER: Since we're living in Shitworld where we love rewarding greed and sucking off our oppressors, this could easily result in higher profits for airlines. What they will try to do is pay flight attendants while planes aren't flying, but then charge customers significantly more and argue that it's to pay the flight attendants while pocketing the excess.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If you have to be somewhere sometime for your job you should be getting paid, we need better unions

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yup. You should be paid from the moment you're required to arrive until the moment you're allowed to leave. That includes

  • Getting changed into uniform, if there's a reason the uniform couldn't have been worn in (e.g. special safety gear, full body character costumes)
  • Any security or bag checks
  • Turning on computers
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My boss at my first job tried to tell me that i needed to be in and logged into my terminal by my shift start time

These terminals were like 15 years old, booted over the network and took at least 5 minutes to log in if they weren't turned off the night before. 8-10 mins if i had to turn it on as well.

I told him to do one.

Also if i was 1 min late for work they would dock 15 mins of pay and still expected me to work the remaining 14 mins unpaid, on minimum wage.

My fiances POW (a care home) does this too to this day

Carers should unionise, it's a highly exploitative sector

Carers should unionise, it's a highly exploitative sector

Many care workers (in the US, at least) are unionized, through SEIU. Perhaps your fiance could reach out to them for help organizing their workplace.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

The commute. Make employers pay an extra 2 hours a day and they'll be a lot more willing to let us work from home.

Of course, not all jobs can be done remotely, but this would free up traffic and improve the commute of those that have to work in-person.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 3 points 1 day ago

We just need a better government at this point.

Both sides need to stop going to bat for the people keeping them down.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait... They don't get paid for work when not flying? Wtf

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, they're flight attendants, not rolling attendants, or sitting at the parking spot attendants. It's all in the job description.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 149 points 2 days ago (4 children)

wtf?

“We can fly upwards of 15 hours in a day and only get paid for three and a half. Our flight attendants don’t make a living wage,” said Becky Black, a flight attendant for nearly 22 years at PSA Airlines, which operates flights for American Airlines. “We have a flight attendant who lives in a homeless shelter. We have flight attendants that are living in crew rooms. We have flight attendants who are 30 years old and have to move back in with their parents because they can’t afford to live with this job.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago (1 children)

capitalism. the problem is fucking capitalism.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago

🌏🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀 always fucking has been.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s wrong. You can be on duty 15 hours a day and only get paid 3.5 hours. She misspoke or the press got it wrong.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately this is true (assuming the PSA block minimum is 3.5hrs) At jetblue it's 5 hrs, at spirit it's 4 hrs. Duty can be scheduled between 12-14 hours and extended upwards of 15 for delays.

Take the example of this fun little overnight trip, you fly one leg to Norfolk, sit on the ground for five hours (six and a half, but half hour deplaning, one hour boarding) then fly back. Your flight time (paid time) is 4hrs33 and your time away from base (time on duty) is 12hrs35

But dont panic folks, you can be disciplined at any point during duty time for your behavior, where you are, and uniform compliance :,(

(Edit: blurred some stuff in the pic)

No idea if PSA even has a day value in their FA contract.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I say the same thing, where "flying" is transit time between places, even if there's a layover. There's a difference being at home and "on duty" as in on-call and ready to go and being stuck in an airport for 10 hours because you're doing a Chicago-LA-Chicago return and stuck in LA because the shitter's broke on the plane you took there and need to get back to O'Hare.

Seriously, that person is not at home and not able to really have control over their own time because of their job. It's more than being just "on duty" in a sense that they shouldn't be getting paid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

If I have to spend time doing ANYTHING (including nothing) for your company against my free will. You will pay me.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Lol you should be allowed to clock in when you start your commute. These CEOs don't even want to pay their employees when they are on the clock and working.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Here's a fun fact. Vasquez Rocks is a common shooting location for Hollywood. Particularly Star Trek; my wife and I make a game of pointing out when they're using Vasquez Rocks for yet another episode.

The reason it's used so much is that it's an arid environment just outside the "studio zone". If they shoot within the studio zone, people have to pay for their own transportation and meals. If it's outside, the studio pays for all that. Vasquez Rocks is just outside the studio zone.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Slight correction, it's just inside the studio zone. Studios wouldn't prefer a place that requires them to pay more!

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that makes more sense.

[–] sawdustprophet@midwest.social 18 points 2 days ago

The reason it's used so much is that it's an arid environment just outside the "studio zone".

Vasquez Rocks is inside the studio zone, according to your link.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

that fact is indeed fun

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YellaLeber@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (8 children)

In theory that sounds good but I don't really get how it'd work. I mean what if you just lived four hours away so your commute there and back was just your eight hours? That's obviously ridiculous so what's the cut off? Like an hour? How does that affect breaks and lunch if you do live an hour away so you're only working six hours? Or is it just like a premium pay, like you earn 10% of your salary on your way in?

I wonder if any company actually does this.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Any company that does that likely uses a company vehicle as company property and demands you live in the specific area.

My old employer did that for our field technicians. You were paid from the second you left your home until you got back. If you had to stay overnight - then they paid for that too.

We hired people all over the US but we only hired people in centralized areas key to our customers. You were NOT allowed to change your home address more than 20 miles without sufficient approval. It would be grounds for termination.

My coworker lived in Alabama, and got some girl pregnant when they had him working in Philadelphia on an all-hands type of emergency . He decided to move to Philly to raise the child. You've no idea the amount of bureaucratic headache it took to stay employed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

My husband has to drive to different sites every day. He clocks in when he starts his car, and starts getting paid either an hour later or the minute he gets to the job site, whichever is sooner. So if they schedule him more than an hour from home, he gets paid for that extra drive time, which is nice. First hour is just expected commute.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If the CEO of the company you work for has to travel more than 30 minutes one way, believe it when I say they have it written in their contract that they are "reimbursed" for their time lost. But you? Eat the cost of not only your commute but your CEOs as well. Some even get a private jet to fly them to work and back every day.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/starbucks-new-boss-private-jet-b2600164.html

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like the US flight attendants are following Canada's lead. Good on them.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 18 points 2 days ago

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/air-canada-flight-attendants-try-build-us-gains-unpaid-work-2025-08-06/

Air Canada (AC.TO), flight attendants want to make gains on unpaid work that go beyond recent advances secured by their U.S. counterparts, a union leader said on Wednesday, in a fresh test of the way airlines compensate cabin crews.

...

New labor agreements at American Airlines (AAL.O), and Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), legally require carriers to start the clock for paying flight attendants when passengers are boarding, not when the flight starts to taxi down the runway. Those gains came after Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), whose flight attendants are not in a union, instituted boarding pay for its cabin crew at half of their hourly wages in 2022 when they were trying to organize.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Canadians just won their negotiations, so not surprising here. Canadians won by outplaying the Canadian carrier though, so not the same strategy.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 days ago

Bunch of lazy freeloaders wanting to get paid for working.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 days ago

I did not know this. It's a wonder anyone chooses to be a flight attendant at all. I know I would quit as soon as I found out they weren't going to pay me for the work I did.

[–] thesink05@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This sounds insane, it would be like if every cashier had to greet customers at the door for free several hours each day.

[–] RedditAdminsSuckIt@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Or they only got paid for the seconds/minutes they were actively checking out a customer. This is insane

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What kind of people stay in a job like that? I would have to be pretty desperate and know that I was otherwise unemployable to keep showing up for a job that only paid me for a fraction of the time I was required to be there.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because it’s still a “glamor” job, and it eventually pays OK after a decade + of work. Travel, travel benefits, don’t take your work home with you…if you’re good with people and can do the training it can be a good gig. It should pay better, but nobody gets paid until the door is closed and the plane pushes back. Not even the pilots, but pilot pay can be high enough to account for all the time at work outside the “door closed at departure and door open at destination” pay clock where the flight attendants are stuck dealing with passengers on a plane even if the door is closed sitting at the gate and they don’t get paid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you mean like work at Starbucks or Home Depot?

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/starbucks-executed-illegal-anti-union-campaign-labor-board-says

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/home-deport-responding-call-31-day-boycott-over-dei

https://www.newsweek.com/american-businesses-supporting-donating-donald-trump-list-2027957

The Home Depot was embroiled in whistleblower litigation brought under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) law. In July 2005, former employee Michael Davis, represented by attorney Mark D. Schwartz, filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the Home Depot, alleging that his discharge was in retaliation for refusing to make unwarranted back charges against vendors. Davis alleges that the Home Depot forced its employees to meet a set quota of back charges to cover damaged or defective merchandise, forcing employees to make chargebacks to vendors for merchandise that was undamaged and not defective. The Home Depot alleges that it fired Davis for repeatedly failing to show up for work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Easy, not on the clock, I'm not working.

Edit: no I didn't read the article.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago

So the converse of that would be: on the clock, I'm working.

And since they're on the clock before and after the plane is in the air, they should be getting paid for that time. It's a fucking travesty that they haven't been until now.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Someone watched Canada and got an idea....

Go for it!

load more comments
view more: next ›