this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
543 points (99.3% liked)

News

32021 readers
2822 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Canadians just won their negotiations, so not surprising here. Canadians won by outplaying the Canadian carrier though, so not the same strategy.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 23 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This is something where there is no excuse but greed.

The wages of flight attendants are a drop in the ocean compared to everything else for operating a plane.

As usual, they attack the ones who can't fight back.

HOWEVER: Since we're living in Shitworld where we love rewarding greed and sucking off our oppressors, this could easily result in higher profits for airlines. What they will try to do is pay flight attendants while planes aren't flying, but then charge customers significantly more and argue that it's to pay the flight attendants while pocketing the excess.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait... They don't get paid for work when not flying? Wtf

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they're flight attendants, not rolling attendants, or sitting at the parking spot attendants. It's all in the job description.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you have to be somewhere sometime for your job you should be getting paid, we need better unions

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yup. You should be paid from the moment you're required to arrive until the moment you're allowed to leave. That includes

  • Getting changed into uniform, if there's a reason the uniform couldn't have been worn in (e.g. special safety gear, full body character costumes)
  • Any security or bag checks
  • Turning on computers
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

My boss at my first job tried to tell me that i needed to be in and logged into my terminal by my shift start time

These terminals were like 15 years old, booted over the network and took at least 5 minutes to log in if they weren't turned off the night before. 8-10 mins if i had to turn it on as well.

I told him to do one.

Also if i was 1 min late for work they would dock 15 mins of pay and still expected me to work the remaining 14 mins unpaid, on minimum wage.

My fiances POW (a care home) does this too to this day

Carers should unionise, it's a highly exploitative sector

Carers should unionise, it's a highly exploitative sector

Many care workers (in the US, at least) are unionized, through SEIU. Perhaps your fiance could reach out to them for help organizing their workplace.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

The commute. Make employers pay an extra 2 hours a day and they'll be a lot more willing to let us work from home.

Of course, not all jobs can be done remotely, but this would free up traffic and improve the commute of those that have to work in-person.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 3 points 23 hours ago

We just need a better government at this point.

Both sides need to stop going to bat for the people keeping them down.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 149 points 1 day ago (4 children)

wtf?

“We can fly upwards of 15 hours in a day and only get paid for three and a half. Our flight attendants don’t make a living wage,” said Becky Black, a flight attendant for nearly 22 years at PSA Airlines, which operates flights for American Airlines. “We have a flight attendant who lives in a homeless shelter. We have flight attendants that are living in crew rooms. We have flight attendants who are 30 years old and have to move back in with their parents because they can’t afford to live with this job.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

capitalism. the problem is fucking capitalism.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago

🌏🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀 always fucking has been.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s wrong. You can be on duty 15 hours a day and only get paid 3.5 hours. She misspoke or the press got it wrong.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately this is true (assuming the PSA block minimum is 3.5hrs) At jetblue it's 5 hrs, at spirit it's 4 hrs. Duty can be scheduled between 12-14 hours and extended upwards of 15 for delays.

Take the example of this fun little overnight trip, you fly one leg to Norfolk, sit on the ground for five hours (six and a half, but half hour deplaning, one hour boarding) then fly back. Your flight time (paid time) is 4hrs33 and your time away from base (time on duty) is 12hrs35

But dont panic folks, you can be disciplined at any point during duty time for your behavior, where you are, and uniform compliance :,(

(Edit: blurred some stuff in the pic)

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

No idea if PSA even has a day value in their FA contract.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I say the same thing, where "flying" is transit time between places, even if there's a layover. There's a difference being at home and "on duty" as in on-call and ready to go and being stuck in an airport for 10 hours because you're doing a Chicago-LA-Chicago return and stuck in LA because the shitter's broke on the plane you took there and need to get back to O'Hare.

Seriously, that person is not at home and not able to really have control over their own time because of their job. It's more than being just "on duty" in a sense that they shouldn't be getting paid.

I didn’t want to get in the weeds for an audience that doesn't need to know the differences between reserves or being stuck at an airport all day on a trip that went bad over weather or maintenance. Yeah, there’s different kinds of duty, but for this argument I’d suggest the latter is far more likely. Long days made worse due to some disruption where you might only get one or two legs done on an RJ.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

If I have to spend time doing ANYTHING (including nothing) for your company against my free will. You will pay me.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (28 children)

Lol you should be allowed to clock in when you start your commute. These CEOs don't even want to pay their employees when they are on the clock and working.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Here's a fun fact. Vasquez Rocks is a common shooting location for Hollywood. Particularly Star Trek; my wife and I make a game of pointing out when they're using Vasquez Rocks for yet another episode.

The reason it's used so much is that it's an arid environment just outside the "studio zone". If they shoot within the studio zone, people have to pay for their own transportation and meals. If it's outside, the studio pays for all that. Vasquez Rocks is just outside the studio zone.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slight correction, it's just inside the studio zone. Studios wouldn't prefer a place that requires them to pay more!

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 2 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, that makes more sense.

[–] sawdustprophet@midwest.social 18 points 1 day ago

The reason it's used so much is that it's an arid environment just outside the "studio zone".

Vasquez Rocks is inside the studio zone, according to your link.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago

Bunch of lazy freeloaders wanting to get paid for working.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like the US flight attendants are following Canada's lead. Good on them.

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/air-canada-flight-attendants-try-build-us-gains-unpaid-work-2025-08-06/

Air Canada (AC.TO), flight attendants want to make gains on unpaid work that go beyond recent advances secured by their U.S. counterparts, a union leader said on Wednesday, in a fresh test of the way airlines compensate cabin crews.

...

New labor agreements at American Airlines (AAL.O), and Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), legally require carriers to start the clock for paying flight attendants when passengers are boarding, not when the flight starts to taxi down the runway. Those gains came after Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), whose flight attendants are not in a union, instituted boarding pay for its cabin crew at half of their hourly wages in 2022 when they were trying to organize.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago

I did not know this. It's a wonder anyone chooses to be a flight attendant at all. I know I would quit as soon as I found out they weren't going to pay me for the work I did.

[–] thesink05@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds insane, it would be like if every cashier had to greet customers at the door for free several hours each day.

Or they only got paid for the seconds/minutes they were actively checking out a customer. This is insane

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

What kind of people stay in a job like that? I would have to be pretty desperate and know that I was otherwise unemployable to keep showing up for a job that only paid me for a fraction of the time I was required to be there.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because it’s still a “glamor” job, and it eventually pays OK after a decade + of work. Travel, travel benefits, don’t take your work home with you…if you’re good with people and can do the training it can be a good gig. It should pay better, but nobody gets paid until the door is closed and the plane pushes back. Not even the pilots, but pilot pay can be high enough to account for all the time at work outside the “door closed at departure and door open at destination” pay clock where the flight attendants are stuck dealing with passengers on a plane even if the door is closed sitting at the gate and they don’t get paid.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 1 points 23 hours ago

The greed in this world is astounding.

We really need to stop respecting businessmen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›