this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
1248 points (99.2% liked)

memes

17192 readers
3470 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we say "commutative" in this case ?

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah stuff like that really ain't it. It works in a few use cases, but is objectively wrong and detracts from understanding the topic properly. That's why I teach percentages as the fractions they are. By the time you learn percentages, you already know multiplying fractions is commutative, so the trick still works, and you also understand why.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that’s why I teach percentages as the fractions they are

What about pi%?

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

That's pi/100 still. Didn't say it was a rational number, just that it was a fraction. Though I don't see a context where it'd make sense.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real? I've never though of this. This may actually be useful!

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

% really just means *1/100 - it doesn't matter where you apply that factor: 6% of 50 = 6% * 50 = 6/100 * 50 = 6*50/100 = 6 * 50/100

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where were you when I failed math 101 4 times?

Thanks!

I was probably on a different continent ^^ Also, the biggest problem explaining math is not making it understandable, but having a motivated learner. Most students that have a bad teacher in school, or are somehow not motivated in school to begin with, will also not be motivated to focus on easier explanations. Technically a basic interest in math should be fostered / encouraged in kids from an early age, and at the latest in elementary school. If that does not work out, many students will have a hard time with it.

You are welcome.

[–] FardyCakes@lemmy.world 203 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This is blowing my fucking mind like an artillery shell

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 115 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I personally find it a lot easier to compute 13% of 17, rather than 17% of 13.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

.2*13=2.6

.03*13=0.39

2.6-0.39=2.21

My brain is maybe a weird place 😂

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 60 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Same with 375% of 20 rather than 20% of 375.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damn, it still worked. Holy shit.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The few times I've seen you on Lemmy, it takes me a few seconds to process your username. Today, I had my favorite misreading yet: pronounced Ivana footerall

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 42 points 3 days ago

Thanks, now I can't unsee that, fartographer

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Actually I disagree.

20% is 1/5

100/5=20

10/5=2

5/5=1

3*20=60

7*2=14

1*1=1

60+14+1=75

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

This is the coolest trick since I learned about the "quick 20% tip on your tab" method. Take the total bill, move the decimal point one place over to the left, then multiply it by 2 to get 20% gratuity. I will sometimes round down on the change to make it closer to 18%. Also I only really need to do this when I'm drunk and can't maths.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] shoo@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My dyscalculic ass trying to remember what 50% of 6 is

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 104 points 3 days ago (5 children)

x/100 * y = x * 1/100 * y = x * y/100

I never would have thought of it myself and still feel like I should have thought of it myself.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

6/100 * 50 = 50/100 * 6
6 * 1/100 * 50 = 50 * 1/100 * 6

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

maths is the same in both case but I get it, for small numbers this is useful

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Grerkol@leminal.space 16 points 2 days ago

Most of the people explaining this still make it more complicated than it needs to be, imo.

I just think the symbol "%" algebraically means 0.01

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is great. I won't remember it when I will need it.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 36 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Just save the meme in the maths folder!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] deadinside91@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Today I learned, thank you wise panzer

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wise panzer of the lake. There are other wise panzers, but they are malevolent, untrustworthy.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

6*50/100 = 50*6/100 if anyone is curious why this works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Legitimately new knowledge for me that will literally make my work easier. Wish I could give you more than 100% of 1 upvote, OP!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago

commutable...

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

I'm gonna track down all my HS math teachers and punch each and every one of them in the mouth.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

Huh. Learning a fun and cool math trick was not on the list of expected outcomes for today, but I'll take it!

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surprised how many people don’t know this. I suspect it is because people forget that percent literally means per 100 or /100 and the of is standing in for multiplication. So 6% of 50 is 6/100 * 50 or 6 * 50 * 1/100

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, 47% of 47 is certainly much easier to determine when you look at it as 47% of 47! Genius!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

You can also

Multiply one side, divide the other to get the base number to get the base number to 100.

6% of 50 == 3% of 100 == 3

5% of 20 == 1% of 100 == 1

7% of 50 == 3.5℅ of 100 == 3.5

~~14% of 200 == 7% of 100 == 7~~

Edit* as pointed out below, this one was incorrect.

14% of 200 == 28% of 100 == 28

You don't have to stop at percentage either.

25 * 16 = 100 * 4

If you're doing addition, you can add and subtract.

27 + 13 = 20 + 20

Most of the difficulty is in realizing that one number or the other can be brought up to a nice round number, making the equation simple to do in your head. And obviously, just getting to around number on one side doesn't always make it easy on the other side.

I always loved screwing with math problems to make them easier, which is weird, because overall, I don't really care for math.

I also do shit like borrowing a couple of numbers to make the equation easy and then pull them back out.

392 / 4 == (400 - 8) / 4 == (100-2) = 98

376 / 4 == (400-24)/4 =100-6=94

Of course it goes up a level when the remainder isn't evenly divisible. But I still find it's something I can handle in my head.

371 / 4 == (400-29)/4= 100-7¼ =100-7.25=92.75

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›