A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
Transcript
Screenshot of a Mastodon post by
Kevin Beaumont: "Generative Al government lobbying."
Photo of AI/tech company CEO's, captioned:
We spent a Trillion on NVDA GPUs antide dont have any Al product you want.
Photo of a crying male, captioned:
Please like our Al bro This is the last time bro. So many possibilities bro. Its the future bro. Just need you to like it bro. We worked real hard bro. Our stockholders need this one bro.
Nvidia really be out there selling pickaxes during the gold rush. Or, more aptly, selling shovels during the digging your own grave rush.
Yeah, they're the one company I can't really fault in this.
If people want to pay you to make a full of themselves, are you really going to turn it down?
I just wish they'd make reasonably priced GPUs for gamers again.
At this point I just want an GPU that CAN‘T do AI. I mean I wouldn‘t pay extra for that, I however would pay extra for more VRAM, bigger bandwidth, more cache, good undervolting performance etc.
Selling shit to assholes.
AI is a distruptive technology...just not in a way most people can use in a positive productive way. As entertainment it's a cool toy
But its best use right now is manipulating public opinion and creating convincing but non-legit material. As a propaganda tool it is a dream come true
I think it's cute when people say that some uses are good (cool toy) ignoring the fact that the current business model is dependent on it becoming much more than that.
The "AI is here to stay" crowd will evaporate as soon as they have to start paying.
The “AI is here to stay” crowd will evaporate as soon as they have to start paying.
And it goes further than that. Imagine if the hyperscalers actually succeed at their goals. They create truly useful agent models. But crucially to their profits, these models can only be built at scale. Their business model fails if someone learns to duplicate their work on sane levels of compute. So let's say everything goes OpenAI's way. They invent truly useful models, and the tech can only work at the massive scale they've invested in, so they don't have to worry about being cut off at the knees.
Now imagine you're a knowledge worker. A programmer. An engineer. An analyst. An editor. Really any job that is done sitting at a keyboard, manipulating data in one form or another. Now imagine you're a knowledge worker and you adopt these new models. You become dependent on them. Less and less of your technical skills actually reside in your own mind. The difference between your knowledge base and that of any rando off the street is now less and less. At some point, you're completely dependent on them to do the most basic functions of your job. Why shouldn't OpenAI charge you or your employer a license fee equal to half your salary? Why shouldn't your boss respond by cutting your salary in half and paying for the LLM license that way?
If the great fever dreams of the hyperscalers comes true, basically every white collar employee in the country sees their labor bargaining power collapse. It would be like the decline of weaving as a profession in England at the start of the Industrial Revolution, which spawned the historical Luddite movement. What was once a skilled profession requiring years of formal apprenticeship became mechanized low-skilled labor that could be (and often was) done by literal children. In OpenAI's ideal future, that is what will happen to anyone that currently makes a living working at a keyboard.
It would devalue labor by making it less specialized. The real skill still present would be those who are just good at carefully stating prompts to the god machine. And if you're good at stating prompts towards one end, you're likely good at stating prompts across many domains. If we really had the kind of LLMs that these companies dream of creating? Prompt engineering would become a mandatory class in high school. You wouldn't be able to graduate high school without learning how to use them. It would be as critical a skill as writing. But it would be a skill that everyone possessed, and thus of little ability to command a decent living from.
State actors used to have to have a bunch of people in an office to spread propaganda, now they can be so much more “effective” by running 1 server farm.
Yeah, I think the main thing it's accomplished so far is making everyone doubt the authenticity of literally all digital media.
It's like a monkeys paw bit.
WISH: I want a piece of software that can look at ANYTHING and then describe it in real-time detail for blind or hard of seeing people.
REALITY: Blind people can navigate streets but also now it's possible to conduct fraud on a cosmic level.
In this sense, it’s actually just highlighting how easily manipulated everything has always been. The printing press made it easy to duplicate the shit out of whatever words you wanted, and AI just made it way more attainable than it’s ever been to create even higher fidelity falsehoods. The internet itself should take the “blame” for the proliferation of propaganda.
But the root problem is the ruling class making it as hard possible to get a good education unless you’re already one of them. An educated populace would be far more resistant to all this.
So I went to a poetry performance tonight, and the poet (I've watched him for 20 years) says he has a SF poem for the first time.
The poem was about the year 2525, where the residents of the burned out husk of a planet that we left behind are decanting one billionaire a year. Billionaires started to cryogenically freeze themselves before the collapse of civilization, so there are plenty of frozen bros in dewar flasks powered by solar panels to dig up.
So they wake up a billionaire a year, and he wakes up tied to a post. He's asked why he didn't give a fuck about what happened to the world in the future, and of course his answers were shit. So they set him on fire, as one does with scapegoats. Guess they'll do it all again next year.
He called the poem "Burning Man".
I applauded, dropped a 20 in his hat, and drove home. Yes, I know.
In the year 2525, if man is still alive…
I always see a lot of comments about how negative Lemmy is toward AI. If ever there is a demographic ideal for AI use, it's the current user base on Lemmy. If you can't convince people on here about AI, then it's not the user that is the problem, it's that the product is wrong (or just plain useless).
You basically have 2 kinds of users here:
Those who understand how AI is created and how it is possible to be used in incredible ways, but through Capitalism is being shoved into all kinds of dumb features that do nothing but annoy users, in the hope of jumping on the AI hype train.
And the AI-phobes who claim AI can do nothing good, it is a waste of resources, it shit in their coffee and is the worst thing since Hitler.
So no, I wouldn't say the current user base on Lemmy is demographically ideal. You don't even need to be technologically inclined to be here, since you just need to be able to create an account like most have done on so many other websites.
Those who understand how AI is created and how it is possible to be used in incredible ways, but through Capitalism is being shoved into all kinds of dumb features that do nothing but annoy users, in the hope of jumping on the AI hype train.
There are legitimate uses for what falls under the umbrella term, but the current hype is 99.9% built on generative AI, preferably LLMs. No one is investing 20 billion dollars to better detect potential risk for Alzheimer's from a person's skin tissue. Megacorps aren't contemplating building nuclear power plants so that we can predict the weather more reliably. The "incredible ways" (and I agree, there are very good applications for non-generative AI) have been there for years, yet few investors cared for them because their commercial application is limited.
They want to to collect a subscription from plebs... That's their goal.
Let's see if it prints.
There are lots of very useful uses for AI. But they're all in a lab or sitting away on a service somewhere crunching numbers. The general public doesn't need to know about them and largely doesn't know about them.
They certainly don't need to be selling access on the internet so that people can program rather crap apps.
I'll keep saying it:
Solution looking for a problem.
This, nfts, metaverse, it feels like recently all tech innovations are driven by speculative value, instead of actually offering something that meaningfully impacts lives. Are we really in a post problem world?
If you follow Cathode Ray Dude at all, he sums it up perfectly. We had our technological peak about 2010/2012. Almost anything the majority of humans do can be done fine on computers from that era or even before (IF the OS vendor didn't purposely make it bloated to run slower, ie Ios, android, osx, windows). Put linux on a laptop from 2007 and i almost guarantee 99% of humans wont complain. The problem is ceos demand FEATURES because LINE MUST GO UP!!! Except now instead of features, its stealing more and more of our data so they can sell it back to us once they shutter yhe free internet.
Don't forget the "We're just one ~~week~~ ~~month~~ ~~quarter~~ ~~semester~~ year away from AGI bro, trust us bro, it'll be just like a really real intelligence bro"
You can make the argument that AI is damaging or unsustainable or not worth the cost, but acting like no one likes or uses it is straight-up delusional. (Not as delusional as people falling in love with their chatbots, but the fact that people are kind of proves my point.)
AI is a tool. Just like any tool it can be used for constructive or destructive purposes.
When AI is replacing jobs that people can do while the people are still told to work harder, or replace art while people who create from nothing lose their profit, yes, people will be pissed.
It could be an amazing tool. The fact that I don't trust my art or my face using any AI is because of the people in control of that tool.
AI isn't the problem. The people that use it and have full control over it are.
AI is a tool. Just like any tool it can be used for constructive or destructive purposes.
LLMs are answering machines that are being promoted as hammers while saying everything is a nail.
Image generation software is a fancy copy machine being sold as a replacement for artists.
If they were being promoted as tools and not shoved down our throats constantly they wouldn't get this kind of pushback.
Everyone knows AI is to help target babies in tents and journalists, come on now.
I need to add Sam Altman to this picture. He always looks like he's about to cry
I can't shut off my phone, find the flashlight, set an alarm, reset my wifi anymore since they pushed through the AI update on this phone.
Interesting enough, when I adjusted everything to a way that helped, my phone finally shut down and reverted everything back. 'Spose I have to jailbreak my phone now? I'm so out of the loop on tech now that I won't even know how to get my PC up to date when I finally have time to because I'm always working. I used to be so good (not really) but enough so that I could at least learn on the fly. Now I know I'm doomed. I can't even figure out how to get into my account to upgrade my internet. I've spent hours that I don't have calling and emailing.
I got one more year of working my ass off. Once the girls graduate I'm fucking off to help my ma and pops through the rest of their years and I'll get back into gaming and fun stuff. Ill have so many fucking questions for yall when I do.
Less than a year. I love my kids but I can't wait to slow down a bit and actually enjoy life.
Gemini is sooo much worse than Google Assistant. I don't trust an LLM to do little calculations or conversions for me, bring back the calculator!
We steal styles from so many authors that anyone can do the same to their taste for free, just by pressing a button instead of throwing your money to these scumbags who don't want to work at normal jobs. Why don't you support us?
