this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
449 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

26002 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

I miss Ruby DSLs so much. Python is bland. It's on purpose, I know and even appreciate it.

Yet I feel like Ruby syntax magic compared to Python blandness is like comparing a steaming plate of beautiful aromatic curry to plain rice.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Ok, everyone who's ever had to use datetime hates it, but not because it's insufficient, but because international date/time is such a nightmare that the library must be complicated enough to support all the edge cases I'm convinced that library has a function for traveling trough time.

For years I've wrapped datetime with custom functions that do exactly and only what I want to mitigate its all-plumbing-zero-porcelain approach to the problem.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

This is exactly why I love PowerShell.

Need the [DateTime] object from 10 years ago? No biggie, just chuck (Get-Date).AddYears(-10) down your console.

Need it in a specific timezone? That one's trickier, but since PowerShell can do .Net, run this:

$TargetDateTime = (Get-Date).AddYears(-10)
$TargetTimeZone = "India Standard Time"
$tz = [TimeZoneInfo]::FindSystemTimeZoneById($TargetTimeZone)
$utcOffset = $tz.GetUtcOffset($TargetDateTime)
[DateTimeOffset]::new($TargetDateTime.Ticks, $utcOffset)

And you get a DateTimeOffset object, which is this beauty:

DateTime           : 25/08/2015 23:15:14
UtcDateTime        : 25/08/2015 17:45:14
LocalDateTime      : 25/08/2015 19:45:14
Date               : 25/08/2015 00:00:00
Day                : 25
DayOfWeek          : Tuesday
DayOfYear          : 237
Hour               : 23
Millisecond        : 421
Microsecond        : 428
Nanosecond         : 600
Minute             : 15
Month              : 8
Offset             : 05:30:00
TotalOffsetMinutes : 330
Second             : 14
Ticks              : 635761413144214286
UtcTicks           : 635761215144214286
TimeOfDay          : 23:15:14.4214286
Year               : 2015

DateTime is the time in your target timezone, UtcDateTime is, well, the UTC time, and LocalDateTime is the time on host you ran the commands on.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Complicated or not, the interfaces suck. And dont have to. And that's the problem.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

exactly why I wrap the parts I need, it's like git, tons of power, zero help.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's two of these threads?! Well ok here's the same comment.

10.years.ago
On.a.cold.dark.night
There.was.someone.killed
'Neath.the.town.hall.lights
There.were.few.at.the.scene
Though.they.all.agreed
That.the.slayer.who.ran
Looked.a.lot.like.me
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The Python won't give an accurate date here because it doesn't take into account leap years.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

timedelta marks time in days, seconds, and microseconds. It doesn't take leap years into account because the concept of years is irrelevant to timedelta. If you need to account for leap years, you need a different API.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

365.25*10 would at least get you closer.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You can subtract two dates and get the exact time difference.

[–] wols@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The comparison is somewhat awkward, because the rails example presumably produces a date, while the python one is referring to an interval of time.
Just from the meme it's not obvious which was the actual intended use, so labeling either as inaccurate requires us to make assumptions.

Personally, the concept of "10 years ago" is a bit nebulous to me. If today is February 29th, is ten years ago March 1st? Doesn't seem right. Or particularly useful.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Ruby should add 10.years.ago.today

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

yeah, that's pretty much why timedelta doesn't have the concept of months or years, just days and smaller units. I like it better this way.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because what's accurate here depends on the context, and the Python example doesn't hide that from the programmer.

The same dilemma goes for month calculations: does "3 months ago" mean 90 days ago, 91.3 days ago, this many days into the target month, or this many days from the target month's end (e.g. to account for 28, 29, 30, and 31-day months)?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

Does the Ruby version do that though?

I haven't got it installed to check, but seeing constants like SECONDS_PER_YEAR in the documentation makes me think it's just as bad if not worse.

https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveSupport/Duration.html

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 48 points 3 days ago

Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto has often said that he is “trying to make Ruby natural, not simple,” in a way that mirrors life.

https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 12 points 3 days ago

Using ruby felt weird, it felt like it shouldn't work but it does.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 37 points 3 days ago (6 children)
[–] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

That explains a lot about how GitHub works… or doesn’t.

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just started a new php gig

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I fucking love PHP. I know I probably sound crazy to most developers, but PHP 8+ is freaking dope.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

I work with Delphi.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The handful of us have moved onto Crystal Lang. It's a statically type checked and compiled dialect of Ruby. Crystal is fun to write code, but the compiler is slower (compared to go-lang/rust)... because... well it's a ruby dialect (with DSL's)... and the 3rd party libraries are limited.

load more comments (2 replies)

I had a coworker choose RoR for a major project despite the fact that he didn't know it, nobody on his team knew it, nobody at our company knew it, and nobody in the entire state knew it. It ended as one would expect, after three years and millions of dollars spent, with the only revenue it generated being $50K from the original client that had to be refunded to avoid a lawsuit.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Besides Crystal, a lot of people went to Elixir and Phoenix as well

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Fuck that. I once used a constraint solver in python where you could += a constraint to a problem. This is completely un-discoverable. In any sane language you can use IntelliSense to find that you can problem.add(constraint) and be done with it without ever touching a manual. Overloaded operators are cool, but a menace.

And while I’m ranting: Angular’s new addRouting(), withThingA(), withThingB() is complete horseshit, too. The old way of doing addRouter({ and letting the IDE tell you what you could to with the router was so much clearer!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Never use numbers when calculating dates. Use the data formats and constants the calendar library provides.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

LLM is saying this is a feature of Rails and not particularly Ruby.

I was surprised Python didn’t have a years parameter but learned about

relativedelta(years=10)

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah its a rails only thing. Rubys biggest issue is its much too intelligent for its own good. Its implicit rather than pythons explicit. Most of the time. That and it's hard to find out where Ruby starts and rails ends.

That being said I made a ton of good money on rails back about 15 or so years ago. Still excellent for starting out.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Ruby’s biggest issue is rails. Ruby is such a beautiful and highly functional language and yet everyone’s experience with it is rails’ horrific metaprogramming magic. I’ve had numerous people tell me they hate Ruby, and yet when I dig deeper I find out that they don’t actually understand where Ruby ends and rails starts and all of their problems lies on rails side. The majority of people I’ve shown that have come to actually like Ruby where they hated it before.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

LLM is saying...

Stop. Nothing at all past those three words is worth a damn.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This implies that integers in ROR are complex objects with properties that would be unhelpful in the majority of scenarios. Is that right?

[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Integers are just integers in ruby, with no structure backing them. They behave like objects, but only in some respects. You can call methods on them, but you can't extend individual numbers with properties for example (which would require them to have structure).

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm gonna be honest, I never was drawn to python. I've been a professional developer for about a decade, and I've written all of one (1) python programs that I can remember (for my own personal use, mind).

[–] addie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What you can achieve in a couple of pages of Python can be pretty spectacular. It's also mostly very easy-to-read, with the possible exception of class inheritance, which is confusing mess.

If you need to write more than a couple of pages, then its lack of types becomes a hindrance to me - doing refactors when functions can take basically any arguments is quite painful, for instance. Not requiring any particular structure is great, up until you start to struggle with lack of structure.

Ideal programming language for when you're wanting to do something that would be a bit too unwieldy for a shell script. It also makes network requests and json parsing very straightforward, so it's great for interacting with REST APIs and writing simple microservices. Fast to write and runs quite quickly, so a good choice for Advent Of Code-like tasks. Would probably choose a different language for larger projects or when working in a team, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m33@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised this post hasn't summoned perl devs yet... 🤨

load more comments
view more: next ›