this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

50252 readers
670 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Guess this is an ad hoc poll for where on the spectrum would you be on the zombie apocalypse, but I do expect halo effect to alter the results.

The question is would you be hostile or friendly to other survivors you come across if they had no recourse for their actions

The main assumption is that You have the inherent resistance to the plague so that way you can you can start in a heavily populated area and make your way out or live in there.

I would be curious if people would hide away for the rest of their lives in a cabin in the woods.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago

How my fellow USians handled (and are still handling) COVID-19 showed my wife & me that there are only four or five people we can actually trust in a zombie apocalypse. Everyone else would get got for either not taking it seriously enough or not being reliably vigilant.

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zombie apocalypse or not, I'd love to hide away for the rest of my life in a cabin in the woods.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Would you have internet there?

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago

In a zombie apocalypse, perhaps not. I might keep a radio for listening and communicating when necessary. In real life... Maybe, depending on the state of the internet by the time I leave civilization. I might just download a bunch of stuff and keep it in multiple drives, (and/or do the radio thing) radios are cool

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My zombie apocalypse plan is to fucking kill myself

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Had this conversation with a coworker a while ago.

Them: Two bullets.

Me: Redundancy in case you miss vitals or it’s ineffective?

Them: One is for my dog.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I'm too afraid to pry

As someone who requires specific medications to live. Absolutely same. Rather go out under my own power the widdle and die and probably be a zombie.

The best strategy in an emergency is always mostly cooperation. There will be some awful behavior to look out for, plus with zombies you'll need a means of keeping them out and screening people for signs of zombification, but it'll be hard to survive and do that stuff without a community. Many hands, diversity of skills, people to talk to, etc.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For a long time the plan was to head up to my friend's house. Cuz he was big into guns and lived basically in the middle of nowhere.

We talked about being defensive but helpful as possible, without sticking our heads out too far.

He passed away a couple years ago and now I'm not sure what the hell we'd do. I've always been outdoorsy, so probably go to one of the woods I'm familiar with and hide out, at least for a bit, to see how things pan out.

So, very defensive, but not very aggressive.

Edit: I'm also pushing 50. I'm still pretty fit, but it better happen soon or we'll probably end up sitting here. Defending the house as long as possible.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah interesting to see old age would affect people's outlook of the apocalypse. I'd like to think the older I get the more I'd look more to the future and leaving the a legacy even in a shitty cataclysm

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd be dead.

Β 

Β 

(It is my firm opinion that I would be one of the first people killed in a zombie apocalypse.)

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Me too. I have no illusions about that.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

me three and especially so if they're fast zombies like 28 days later or zombieland

[–] cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

I dunno. I actually think about this sometimes. I'd like to think I'd be friendly, but it depends on how everything went for me leading up to wherever I end up. If I lost my entire family, I would probably become pretty hostile towards everything. If I wound up in a big safe place with lots of supplies and people, I'd probably be more friendly, but also wary of anyone new.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are all only three meals away from absolute savagery

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Factually not true. You'll notice that even in Gaza, people shove each other to get at the scraps, but that's it for open inter-civilian violence, and extended families are still looking out for each other.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's mostly their religion keeping the social fabric together. Israel can keep their entire family and they will say God is sufficient for them 5 seconds later. These things don't happen anywhere else. And even in Palestine there's opportunists like the Abu Shabab gang.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Zombies are so dumb, they don't even know where the brains are, they always go after the abdomen.

If you can't defeat a slow moving undead creature with fewer active brain cells than Donald Turnip, then that's on you..

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Lol zombies stop being an issue pretty fast in a zombie apocalypse

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They certainly seem to be a master at it.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you, I'll be here all week..

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What if they are like the ones in World War Z? Fast and ferocious.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shit, I'm hostile now.

Legit, I'm usually nice to people, even though I hate people at large. But I don't trust any motherfucker at my back until they've proven they can be trusted.

That's how I would handle things in a crisis like that. Short term, low trust, mutually understood cooperation, but with safety valves.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Fortunately, a samurai is probably better equipped to handle the undead than the average person.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Friendly! I have experience growing food and I'm pretty good at cooking it too. Someone else can teach me how to kill and eat the deer that infest this area so that we can have a balanced diet. We will do mutual aid and survive against challenges that we could not face alone. Apes together strong.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah I'd try to bring power back to whatever survivors are left so that fridges could run to preserve food longer. It's funny to think we would start to like each other when we start sharing expertise

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People tend to change when facing true hunger and scarcity. Hard to tell. It can go really quickly into shoot first ask questions later, but really depends on the depth of desperation.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I forgot to add an assumption that there would be plenty of food and resources since their would be empty houses with food in them at people's time of death. You could be the 1 survivor in 50 or 1 in 1000 so like you're gonna get enough food for years to come. Of course there's farms that might be planted that will be ready for harvest.

It's weird to think you can invade a power plant and raid the fridge.

You could take on a small structure and move up to a small town then cities once you're conditioned.

But that's just me musing

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

At first, hostile. Once things settle and communities start to form, I’ll be friendly. But for the first few months, I’ll be protecting family and possessions aggressively.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Friendly. Humans are a social species, that's the way it works; the battle royale thing is mostly good for television. Even the fucked up shit we do is done socially.

What do you mean about the halo effect? I thought that was about physical attractiveness.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Hostile, how else am I going to kill zombies?

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I assume zombies function like in Plague Inc. They eventually just starve to death after some months, so just being closed in couls be okay for some months imo.

But I would be a cautiosly friendly one prob who eventually gets exploited by trusting in people sorta.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends. I'd focus on participating in a disciplined community that can develop some degree of self-sufficience, and if feasible focus on producing some surplus goods to trade with other groups, like alcohol as disinfectant or fuel for goods we need. We would still practice self-defense.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

If I wanted to isolate myself from society altogether I'd probably already be doing that a lot more than I currently am. I keep to myself more than most, perhaps, but I'm not interested in becoming a recluse

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m generally a nice person who wants to help and do right by other people. But, I also have to balance that with my abundant paranoia and distrust of people. So I dunno.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As much as I would like to be friendly, I live in America. The reality of the situation is that a lot of the people who will survive the initial hardship are going to be conservative preppers who currently try to deny my right to exist. There's no way I could be friendly with them, just as I would not expect them to be able to be friendly with me.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'd be curious how far they would get, they would have food to hold out and ammo to Hunt, but I feel like they would make a simple mistake like not taking care of a wound properly.

Yeah I can see marginalized communities would be standoffish

Assuming I've already lost all friends/family then yeah, a cabin in the woods fending for myself sounds nice. Otherwise all things considered I'd try to be the friendly type, having more people in your group is usually better than being solo.

But all that probably means I'd die in the first year LOL. Most likely wouldn't cut it being alone and starting out I'd probably have the bad luck of picking the wrong type of "friends". To really stick it out in that sort of situation you probably have to manage to survive through a few groups of people starting out until you end up with a stable group of people willing to work together.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I would be friendly to those playing coop and hostile to those who are not.

[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hostile as fuck, stay the fuck away.

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh haha, Gee whiz neighbor, I wish I could say different but I'm quite certain I would eat the lips clean off your head if I had to.

That's not to say I would never consider doing that with some friends though.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m usually friendly but in a scenario like this it’s better to be very cautious of people.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I probably should have asked if people would think other survivors would be friendly. I think people would friendlier because theirs a common enemy and resources to go around

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think resources would be plenty. Then look at Covid and how people behaved when toilet paper was suddenly a luxury. And then we at least had a somewhat functioning government.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was actually plenty of toilet paper, it's just that panic buying causes pointless shortages. If we had a functioning government they'd have rationed toilet paper to make sure everyone could get enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί