this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13981 readers
757 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia, Ethiopia: mostly orthodox

Cuba, Angola, Congo-Brazzaville: mostly Catholic

Burkina Faso: mostly Muslim

Asian ones: too obvious to discuss

I have an inkling of a theory why

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think we simply haven't had enough successful proletarian revolutions to get any statistically significant data on the role of religion.

For various reasons Protestantism is mostly associated with northern Europe, which also happens to be solidly imperial core. As a general trend, northern Europeans has been one of the places with the least material pressure to revolt.

Put Norway under brutal foreign colonial rule for a few generations and subject them to crushing exploitation and poverty and you'll see them radicalise just as the Cubans and the Chinese did.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago

Put Norway under brutal foreign colonial rule for a few generations and subject them to crushing exploitation and poverty and you'll see them radicalise just as the Cubans and the Chinese did.

this

[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not aiming this at op, who presumably has an interesting theory cooking, but ngl I'm getting kinda tired of all these 'left theological' takes. The forces of reaction are currently sweeping across the west, abetted by an alliance of evangelical and catholic orgs and there are still people who want to blame everything on 'calvinism' as if that were useful analysis and not just thinly veiled sectarianism.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the strain of that informs a lot of the current/last 50+ years of evangelical thinking and they're ascendant in power. it's surface level, but it's not wrong

[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Catholicism has been way more influential on the US right ever since the nineties. Catholic orgs were instrumental in getting GWB into power and have led the charge in capturing the supreme court, rolling back reproductive rights etc. A majority of SCJs are in fact Catholic, and many leading political figures, including the VP. Catholic dogma informs the social policy around which this block agitates. However, none of this is to say that there is something uniquely problematic about belief in transubstantiation or whatever; my point is that trying to pin political problems on theology is an absolute dead end.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

It really doesn't and isn't. The guys running the evangelical right arent the fucking Presbyterians.

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Didn't have a genuine successful revolution. Was pounded into submission by soviet artillery and troops and the ruins of it taken by force by the USSR in the course of the war and occupied after with the socialist government installed, reactionaries pushed aside by outside occupation forces. As we saw Germany itself went fascist rather than communist and they crushed the organic efforts of German revolutionaries.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

TBH, pre-1933 support for communists in Protestant areas was significantly higher than in Catholic areas.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

If Germany had been Balkanized after WWI the North and East were more commie than the rest. May have actually seen revolution in a subset. Of course the conditions of Balkanization would make a big difference, though.

The North + East are and were the more protestant areas while the South and Austria were more catholic. The latter were hotbeds of Nazis. Famously, the Hofbraeuhaus in Munich is where much of The Holocaust was decided.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope you're not suggesting that Catholicism has any particular level of compatibility with communism, since the Catholic Church has been an explicitly anticommunist entity for some time now and we can see e.g. in Cuba that Catholicism gets in the way of social reform, which has over and over been accomplished in spite of and by overcoming Catholic prejudices rather than with the support of Catholic teachings.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Protestants are way more conservative and reactionary than Catholics in Latin America thanks to US influence. All the small protestants churches that existed before were repressed by the US backed military dictatorships because they were seen as too liberal (which radicalized them to be more left-wing and united with their left-wing catholic and jewish counterparts during the 1970s).

Usually Catholics are seen as more liberal because the majority of the population are Catholics or have a religion that has strong ties with Catholicism (be Espiritismo or some Native/Afro-Latino Religion). Meanwhile Protestants megachurches promote shit like Zionism, Anti-Communism and Anti-LGBTQ+ stuff. There are small groups inside these Protestants Churches that actually support Left-Wing policies (such as being critical of Israel, supporting LGBTQ+ rights, Native Rights, etc...) and Left-Wing candidates (which you can see in Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela) but they keep the Protestant rhetoric.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

The vast majority of Protestant practices are disgusting, I'm not taking their side in some sectarian fight. I'm saying that Catholicism is also ultimately a conservative-to-reactionary social formation that has impeded communism, and victories for a genuinely socialist left among Catholic populations has generally been in spite of rather than because of Catholicism (as I would say for Protestantism).

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago

There are not that many majority protestant countries to begin with. In most protestant countries. Most protestants share space with Catholicism, eastern-orthodoxy or islam. "Pure-protestant countries" are basically the nordics, some-oceanian countries and collection of countries within southern africa. You have DDR of course that was majority protestant.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean, capitalism dialectically emerged alongside Protestantism, so it’s not surprising that the most developed capitalist economies might tend towards Protestant, and least in historical backgrounds. Two of those states (UK and Holland) created vast settler colonial empires. I only think this is meaningful in understanding how Protestantism and capitalism emerged together.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] heatenconsumerist@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

How did Zionism infiltrate American Christianity and sway them away from Socialistic policies?

British theologian John Nelson Darby developed "Dispensationalism" which interpreted biblical prophecies as mandating Jewish return to Palestine before Christ's Second Coming.

This spread throughout the late 19th century (1850-1900) and was published in the 1909 Scofield Reference Bible (a text funded by capitalist backers and disseminated widely in American seminaries).

Figures like Jacob Schiff (Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) and the Rothschilds financed Zionist projects, including early settlements in Palestine. Capitalists purchased religious newspapers or sponsored pro-Zionist content. The Rothschilds and associates influenced outlets like The Fundamentals (1910–1915).

Wealthy Zionists such as Bernard Baruch and Louis Brandeis (a Supreme Court Justice) funded groups like the Federation of American Zionists (1897). They coordinated with clergy to frame Zionism as a moral imperative, leveraging pulpits for political advocacy, such as endorsing the 1917 Balfour Declaration (British government expressing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine).

Early 20th century Christians were VERY socialist, their voting numbers were growing at an insane rate. They needed to shut that down, and flooded the Church with heavily-capitalist ideology to sway voters towards the establishment (and consequently zionism).

Why does it matter?

CUFI (Christians United For Israel) is much, much larger than AIPAC. They are a 501(c)(3) religious nonprofit, so any donations to Zionist candidates are entirely un-trackable.

The USG want you to be mad at the people "over there" (or to make right-wingers mad at "the jews") and not the people here (who own all of the capital and the government of the people over there).

[–] BadTakesHaver@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

someone should make a Mormon communist country

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Protestant countries are basically just Anglos and Northern Europe. All imperial core and subject to the issues with revolutionary potential described by Marx, Engels et al. In addition, many foci of revolution have been national liberation struggles, particularly in colonies, and the protestant colonizers did not prioritize proselytization, missionaries, or integration in their colonial projects. They enforced white supremacy and did settler colonial genocides instead. So colonies of protestant colonizers did have successful revolutions, including proletarian ones, but they were often not protestant, instead reflecting more their immediate historical demographics.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If god supported communism he would've given Br*tain to The Levellers

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if we had communism but the anglos weren’t invited that would be so funny!

(Quebec is fine but y’all are on thin ice)

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Quebec is fine but y’all are on thin ice

I imagine they are. I hear it's quite cold up in KKKlanada.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

Estonia and Latvia are the exceptions that prove the rule.

But then Lithuania, Poland, and Hungary are proof that a Catholic country that goes communist is just as prone to springing back into fascism as any others.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One might suggest that there is some kind of link between The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

[–] GeckoChamber@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Grenada is plurality protestant now, but I guess it could have been more catholic back in the commie days?

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

and Eric Gairy was a Catholic

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have an inkling of a theory why

Is it the same tired nonsense about how protestantism is uniquely bad as a religion peddled by everyone else with pretenses of radicalism?

Because at this point I may start going back to church out of sheer exasperation with that ridiculous shit.

[–] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not uniquely "bad"; I do think it is uniquely exploitable by capitalists

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You'd be wrong there too. The difference lies in the material conditions of the states involved, not in whether the dominant culture is typivally associated with a professed belief in sola fide.

[–] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Catholicism (at the state level) has a historic legacy of combating the rise of capitalism (in favor of preserving Feudalism) that Protestantism does not have (and in fact has a historic legacy of the opposite).

For elaboration of this claim, check my comment history circa 9 days ago.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The Catholic Church has a historic legacy of being reactionary (Just as many Protestant churches do) and that has led it to opposing any kind of progressive or revolutionary movement, be that liberalism and capitalism (Or indeed just "less terrible feudalism") or socialism. The Catholic Church in doing so has supported capitalism (And fascism), including carrying out economic liberal reform on behalf of regimes like Franco's.

Likewise the first political crisis faced by protestantism were the jacqueries of Luther's time, and Luther was very much on the side of the feudal order in that conflict, as were the national churches of the scandinavian countries during their reckoning with serfdom.

[–] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cool. Seems like you know a lot about this.

My primary point is that capitalism and Protestantism reinforced each other until both became dominant within modern empire (UK --> US).

I concede that Catholicism eventually capitulated but that doesn't much erode the point that it resisted while possible and isn't the most exploitable form of Christianity for capitalism. To be clear, I do not claim that Catholicism is in any way progressive.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My primary point is that capitalism and Protestantism reinforced each other until both became dominant within modern empire (UK --> US).

And i just think we should re-examine that claim by Max Weber from a materialist/marxist perspective. As Marx pointed out, the relative early development of capitalism in Northern Europe came in part out of the different property relations that existed within these countries, the loss of the commons in the UK is one such example. This was not caused by an abandonment of Catholic doctrine.

Likewise explicit feudal obligations were retained in Scandinavia for almost a century longer than they were in France, supported by the Protestant national churches. Explicit codified serfdom was reintroduced in Denmark under a protestant regime, having been abolished under a catholic (Or at least pre-reformation) one.

[–] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I can appreciate that criticism; it is, if nothing else, reductionist.

[–] CrispyFern@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hélder Pessoa Câmara OFS (7 February 1909 – 27 August 1999) was a Brazilian Catholic prelate who served as Archbishop of Olinda and Recife from 1964 to 1985 during the military dictatorship in Brazil. He was declared a Servant of God in 2015.

A self-identified socialist, Câmara was an advocate of liberation theology. He did social and political work for the poor and for human rights and democracy during the military regime. Câmara preached for a church closer to the disfavoured people. He is quoted as having said, "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why they are poor, they call me a communist."

During his first years as a priest he was a supporter of the far-right fascist Brazilian Integralist Action (Ação Integralista Brasileira, AIB), an ideological choice that he later rejected. He was active in the formation of the Brazilian Bishops' Conference (CNBB) in 1952, and served as its first general secretary until 1964. In that role, he founded Caritas Brazil in 1956.

Under the guidance of Câmara, the Catholic Church in Brazil became an outspoken critic of the 1964–1985 military dictatorship, and a powerful movement for social change. In his famous interview with Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci, he also stated that, despite his support for non-violence, he did not condemn violent tactics: "And I respect a lot priests with rifles on their shoulders; I never said that to use weapons against an oppressor is immoral or anti-Christian. But that's not my choice, not my road, not my way to apply the Gospels".

Câmara identified himself as a socialist and not as a Marxist, but while disagreeing with Marxism, had Marxist sympathies. In the Fallaci interview, he stated, "My socialism is special, it's a socialism that respects the human person and goes back to the Gospels. My socialism is justice." He said, concerning Marx, that while he disagreed with his conclusions, he agreed with his analysis of the capitalist society.

He never denied his communist sympathies and he openly supported dialogue with communists. He believed in the Fátima apparitions but he interpreted its call for the "conversion of Russia" as meaning that the Soviet Union and China would abandon their anti-religious policies but will not be rejecting communism.

He wrote: "And what was the appeal of Fatima for? Not for the annihilation of the USSR and China, but for their conversion... In 1967, the Russian Revolution will celebrate its jubilee... We must accelerate the pace, there is no more time to waste".

In a poem dedicated to French Dominican priest Louis-Joseph Lebret, Câmara states his belief that Karl Marx is in Heaven, and has him decorating Lebret of behalf of Jesus Christ.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Bonus: Catalonia is Catholic, Bavaria is Catholic, Paris is Catholic though at the time they would have vehemently opposed any suggestion that it had anything to do with the matter.