this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
295 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

16251 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 day ago

That website had a crazy amount of publicity lately here in Melbourne because it was involved in a triple homicide case!

A lady was found guilty of murdering some family members of her ex-husband at a lunch by serving poisonous mushrooms she located using iNaturalist. Cooked into a Beef Wellington, of all things.

The trial was something of a sensation, seemed like it was all anyone talked about for the couple months it was going on.

The guilty last, Erin Patterson, is currently awaiting sentencing.

sha sha sha! pocket pheremones!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

In the biblical sense?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I'm still looking for a good app to identify insects (mostly in Europe). Is iNaturalist the best?

[–] Ozymandias1688@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago

I found obsidentify more reliable than inaturalist/seek

[–] wieson@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is.

  • good automatic id
  • manual id by scientists or enthusiasts
  • you develop your own Pokédex
  • you provide data for scientific research
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Also, if you put your image(s) under a compatible license (CC BY-SA or less restrictive), we on Wikipedia also pull from iNaturalist for images to add to Wikimedia Commons. It helps a surprising amount.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ah wow, that's great! I'll have a look.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That sounds very promising. Thanks for the info.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

There was a recent drama around it which had to do with generative AI they wanted to use in the app.

https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/19/google-bribes-inaturalist-to-use-generative-ai-volunteers-quit-in-outrage/

[–] Cuzscience@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seek is also a decent alternative if you want quick results with minimal steps. It’s a more casual experience. You basically scan your specimen with Seek on live video and it identifies it in real-time. You miss out on the iNaturalist community help, but you can link Seek to your iNaturalist account to share observations.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'll try iNaturalist first but if that doesn't work for my use case I'll have a look at Seek. Thank you.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I use obsidentify

I just yell "hey anyone know what this is" and usually someone yells back

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Cool, thanks for bringing it to my attention.

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

*strained exhale*