this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
406 points (98.6% liked)

Uplifting News

16427 readers
87 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 87 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I guess this is uplifting is you don’t have a rice farm…

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Capitalism makes this both uplifting and awful.

The article basically says Indonesia and the Philippines aren't importing any rice so the demand is way down, bringing the prices back to what they were at before the prices jumped apparently.

Way down is apparently around the price in 2022/2023

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't it more of a unplanned, free market problem? Related to capitalism (stock market), but not really capitalism.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Making a need a commodity is 100% capitalism.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure every economic system will put a value on food

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Having value isn't the same as exploiting value for financial gain.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The things I inherited from my grandpa are valuable.

0 chance I'd even consider selling them. I will be giving them away or willing them to people when I die/get older though.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

well, he was more than a man

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago

He was a union man.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

lol even Marx and Engels in their manifesto cite this specifically as an example.

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah i might be taking an L this year. i'd be happy for consumers if this leads to cheaper rice in grocery stores.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats not how it works. In most eastern countries rice is heavily controlled and subsidized the same way we control mechanism dairy, corn, wheat etc. So its not pure market capitalism at play.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Even in countries where the government doesn’t do this, there are companies that buy “Future produce” to help farms mitigate risk. They say what their price for corn will be months before harvest, and even if a bunch of global events affect the crop’s price, the farm gets reliable income. They don’t get the windfalls of high prices, but they’re basically offloading the risk, like insurance.

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Rice: Thrives even though humans are fucking the climate, the soil and the water it needs to grow.

Human: my money :(((

Rejoice motherfucker, we are still not at the point of no return.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

If they want the government paying them for the bad years, then they have to want to not make bank on the good ones.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Does this imply that each farmer has a larger harvest also?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Good to hear. I don't see Japan mentioned in the article, hopefully this resolves their shortage.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought the issue was japan not importing rice, not necessarily a global shortage

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Thought I read somewhere a long time ago that they imported a bunch of rice from the US as a result of some trade agreement. But they don’t want to eat the rice from the US because it’s lower quality. So it doesn’t get sold for human consumption. Though I guess they use it to make other stuff. Like you could ferment and distill it.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Iirc we use American rice in cheaper restaurants and donate it for himantarian aid overseas but I imagine not many people, myself included, would buy American rice at the grocery stores unless absolutely necessary.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

They were using it for pig feed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Japan’s “rice crisis” is totally self-inflicted and very solvable.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At the cost of their domestic food security.

Did we not learn from the pandemic?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Japan has no domestic food security, it imports 60% of all food (one of the highest in the world btw) and it would be unsustainable any other way so it must have a strong trade policy. This makes the recent Japanese alt right moves all more idiotic.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Makes a lot of sense to try and preserve the remaining 40% then

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How? The bottle neck is workable land not farmer incentive.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Farmers being 80 years old and young people moving to the cities doesn’t help.

Nor do the laws making it essentially impossible for foreign nationals to own and manage farmland.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely. I lookup Japan's immigration programs every year and every year is not good enough for anyone worth their salt to bother, especially when compared to neighboring countries. Also the current political shift to right is a major red flag.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Correct. So that means the incentive would obviously be placed on higher value crops and not necessarily staple crops like rice.

That's a big problem for a nation's food security

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 13 points 3 weeks ago

JA has a tight grip on rice in Japan. Add to that the insistence of JP govt to not import rice in almost all circumstances and you can guess that the rice market in Japan is almost disconnected from the global rice markets

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool, though I'm yet to see this in my own country. Here, the price of rice seems to be on an all-time high.

Eggs, though, are cheaper than ever, literally thrice as cheap as they were (winks to Americans)

[–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Usually takes a while to trickle down to consumer level prices.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I checked current prices against my last order, 2 months ago, and I don’t see a price change on the bags of rice.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

According to the chart in the article (which only discusses the price of one specific type of rice) almost all of the price drop occurred over 2024, and it's only dropped a little more throughout 2025 so far. Maybe compare to your rice order a year ago

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

20lb bags of jasmine rice.

2023: $16.97

2024: $16.97

2025: $18.55

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The prices discussed in the article are wholesale commodity prices and do not reflect retail markups. The price you're paying accounts for transportation costs, store salaries, and much more, whereas the prices in the article is what rice farmers are selling for. Also, short term price fluctuations are unlikely to impact retail prices at all, where long term fluctuations may impact prices slowly over time, assuming retailers decide to pass cost savings on to customers at all

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago

I can math, it’s always been an easy A. But economics twists my head. Half of it seems reliant on the neighborhood of make-believe and chaos. I believe you but I’m not going to pretend to understand it.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Incoming rice tariff…

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Just in time for the subpar corn yields

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sooo... Consumer prices on rice products will come down then?

I understand the economic theory, I am honestly just a jaded ass at this point. It will be great if supply prices come down and restaurants don't pay as much for the rice, but consumer prices will always be downward inflexible, so they will just pocket the extra profit and we are still shafted. Some places may lower prices to attempt to compete more, but not by as much as their margins increase.

load more comments
view more: next ›