this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7071 readers
367 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
112
US Bureau of Land Management Calls New Oil and Gas Rules ‘Noncontroversial,’ Exempts Them From Public Comment (insideclimatenews.org)
submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Bureau of Land Management implemented four rules today that create more leeway for oil and gas companies wanting to drill on public lands, as required by the spending bill President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress passed in July. But voters will not have a chance to comment on two of the rules.

Note that they're also making it impossible to locate wind or solar on public land

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Who’s up to crowdfund some leasing of vast tracks of public lands?

Also, as far as I’m concerned, pipeline sabotage is now officially on the table.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sabotage wasn't on the table already?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

I made it official though

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A "huge tracts of land" campaign would be memorable.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

That one sank into the swamp…

[–] amikulo@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

Sabotage seems noncontroversial to me, go ahead.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

I love it when my opinion is handed to me wholesale like that. It's how I know there's absolutely zero corruption. /s